Literature DB >> 21720311

The validated embryonic stem cell test to predict embryotoxicity in vitro.

Andrea E M Seiler1, Horst Spielmann.   

Abstract

In the embryonic stem cell test (EST), differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) is used as a model to assess embryotoxicity in vitro. The test was successfully validated by the European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and models fundamental mechanisms in embryotoxicity, such as cytotoxicity and differentiation. In addition, differences in sensitivity between differentiated (adult) and embryonic cells are also taken into consideration. To predict the embryotoxic potential of a test substance, three endpoints are assessed: the inhibition of differentiation into beating cardiomyocytes, the cytotoxic effects on stem cells and the cytotoxic effects on 3T3 fibroblasts. A special feature of the EST is that it is solely based on permanent cell lines so that primary embryonic cells and tissues from pregnant animals are not needed. In this protocol, we describe the ECVAM-validated method, in which the morphological assessment of contracting cardiomyocytes is used as an endpoint for differentiation, and the molecular-based FACS-EST method, in which highly predictive protein markers specific for developing heart tissue were selected. With these methods, the embryotoxic potency of a compound can be assessed in vitro within 10 or 7 d, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21720311     DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2011.348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  47 in total

1.  Validation of the rat limb bud micromass test in the international ECVAM validation study on three in vitro embryotoxicity tests.

Authors:  Horst Spielmann; Elke Genschow; Nigel A Brown; Aldert H Piersma; Aart Verhoef; Marielle Q I Spanjersberg; Hannele Huuskonen; Francoise Paillard; Andrea Seiler
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 2.  Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine.

Authors:  Gordon Keller
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Prevalidation of the Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST)-A New In Vitro Embryotoxicity Test.

Authors:  G Scholz; E Genschow; I Pohl; S Bremer; M Paparella; H Raabe; J Southee; H Spielmann
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  1999 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  The Relative Semi-quantification of mRNA Expression as a Useful Toxicological Endpoint for the Identification of Embryotoxic/Teratogenic Substances.

Authors:  K Bigot; J de Lange; G Archer; R Clothier; S Bremer
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  1999 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Evaluation of developmental toxicant identification using gene expression profiling in embryonic stem cell differentiation cultures.

Authors:  Dorien A M van Dartel; Jeroen L A Pennings; Liset J J de la Fonteyne; Karen J J Brauers; Sandra Claessen; Joost H van Delft; Jos C S Kleinjans; Aldert H Piersma
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Cardiomyocytes differentiated in vitro from embryonic stem cells developmentally express cardiac-specific genes and ionic currents.

Authors:  V A Maltsev; A M Wobus; J Rohwedel; M Bader; J Hescheler
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Disentangling cellular proliferation and differentiation in the embryonic stem cell test, and its impact on the experimental protocol.

Authors:  Dorien A M van Dartel; Nicole J L Zeijen; Liset J J de la Fonteyne; Frederik J van Schooten; Aldert H Piersma
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Optimisation of the cell cultivation methods in the embryonic stem cell test results in an increased differentiation potential of the cells into strong beating myocard cells.

Authors:  Ann De Smedt; Margino Steemans; Marlies De Boeck; Annelieke K Peters; Bas-jan van der Leede; Freddy Van Goethem; Ann Lampo; Philippe Vanparys
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Cytotoxicity test using blastocyst-derived euploid embryonal stem cells: a new approach to in vitro teratogenesis screening.

Authors:  G Laschinski; R Vogel; H Spielmann
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.143

10.  Monitoring of teratogenic effects in vitro by analysing a selected gene expression pattern.

Authors:  C Pellizzer; S Adler; R Corvi; T Hartung; S Bremer
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Alternative models in developmental toxicology.

Authors:  Hyung-yul Lee; Amy L Inselman; Jyotshnabala Kanungo; Deborah K Hansen
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 2.  Stem cells and stem cell-derived tissues and their use in safety assessment.

Authors:  Kyle Kolaja
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  In Vitro Microscale Models for Embryogenesis.

Authors:  Jennifer Rico-Varela; Dominic Ho; Leo Q Wan
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 4.  Human-induced pluripotent stems cells as a model to dissect the selective neurotoxicity of methylmercury.

Authors:  Lisa M Prince; Michael Aschner; Aaron B Bowman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.770

5.  Transcriptomics analysis of early embryonic stem cell differentiation under osteoblast culture conditions: Applications for detection of developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Xinrong Chen; Tao Han; J Edward Fisher; Wafa Harrouk; Melissa S Tassinari; Gwenn E Merry; Daniel Sloper; James C Fuscoe; Deborah K Hansen; Amy L Inselman
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Thalidomide induces apoptosis in undifferentiated human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Saoko Tachikawa; Toshinobu Nishimura; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Kiyoshi Ohnuma
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Diffraction-based technology for the monitoring of contraction dynamics in 3D and 2D tissue models.

Authors:  Ronan Le Harzic; Ina Meiser; Julia C Neubauer; Iris Riemann; Michael Schiffer; Frank Stracke; Heiko Zimmermann
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  From the Cover: An Animal-Free In Vitro Three-Dimensional Testicular Cell Coculture Model for Evaluating Male Reproductive Toxicants.

Authors:  Lei Yin; Hongye Wei; Shenxuan Liang; Xiaozhong Yu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Loss of CDK5RAP2 affects neural but not non-neural mESC differentiation into cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Nadine Kraemer; Ethiraj Ravindran; Sami Zaqout; Gerda Neubert; Detlev Schindler; Olaf Ninnemann; Ralph Gräf; Andrea E M Seiler; Angela M Kaindl
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Tom Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Andre Kleensang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.