Literature DB >> 21719436

Laparoscopic splenectomy: learning curve comparison between benign and malignant disease.

Shannon A Fraser1, Simon Bergman, Jacob Garzon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New surgical techniques should be formally evaluated for feasibility and safety. As a model for this evaluation, this study examines the authors' institution's experience with splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic disease since the introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in 1996. The authors present the evaluation of the recognized surgeon/institutional learning curve using CUSUM (cumulative sum) analysis.
METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective chart review of consecutive splenectomies for hematologic disease performed between 1996 and 2008. The primary outcome was conversion to open splenectomy. The learning curve for LS was evaluated using CUSUM analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 123 splenectomies were performed for benign (51.2%) or malignant (48.7%) hematologic disease. 58% of patients underwent planned LS, with a 21% conversion rate. The surgeon's overall learning curves for LS, as well as that for malignant disease, were maintained within acceptable conversion thresholds. However, the learning curve for benign disease did cross the unacceptable conversion threshold at case 29. With additional experience, the curve again approached the acceptable conversion threshold. Patients with malignant disease were significantly older (P = .0004), had larger spleens (P = .0004), were more likely to undergo open splenectomy (P = .001), and had longer lengths of stay (P = .01). However, there was no significant difference in operative time, transfusion requirements, morbidity rates, or mortality rates between patients with benign and malignant disease.
CONCLUSION: LS, for benign or for malignant hematologic disease, is associated with a significant learning curve. This evaluation model illustrates that careful patient selection and ongoing quality assessment is essential when introducing a new technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21719436     DOI: 10.1177/1553350611410891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  10 in total

1.  Single incision versus reduced port splenectomy--searching for the best alternative to conventional laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Julio Lopez Monclova; Eduardo M Targarona; Pablo Vidal; Yerald Peraza; Francisco Garcia; Carlos Rodriguez Otero; Luis Pallares; Carmen Balague; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Clinical, Anatomical, and Pathological Grading Score to Predict Technical Difficulty in Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Non-traumatic Diseases.

Authors:  Carlos Rodriguez-Otero Luppi; Eduardo M Targarona Soler; Carmen Balague Ponz; Juan Pablo Pantoja Millán; Victor Turrado Rodriguez; Jose Luis Pallares Segura; Jesus Bollo Rodriguez; Manel Trias Folch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Predicting venous thrombosis in patients undergoing elective splenectomy.

Authors:  Peter Szasz; Ali Ardestani; Brent T Shoji; David C Brooks; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Benign Hematological Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Demetrios Moris; Nikoletta Dimitriou; John Griniatsos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia: learning curve for attending surgeons and residents.

Authors:  Jyoji Yoshizawa; Syuichi Ashizuka; Naruo Kuwashima; Masashi Kurobe; Keichiro Tanaka; Shinsuke Ohashi; Tomomasa Hiramatsu; Yuji Baba; Daisuke Kanamori; Sayuri Kaji; Takao Ohki
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.

Authors:  Ali M Linsk; Kimberley R Monden; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

Authors:  Likun Zhang; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Woojin Ahn; Cristol Grosdemouge; Jesse M Rideout; Scott K Epstein; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Training on a virtual reality cricothyroidotomy simulator improves skills and transfers to a simulated procedure.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Coleman A Odlozil; Salman S Hasan; Rehma Shabbir; Di Qi; Melih Turkseven; Suvranu De; Geoffrey Funk; Rebecca J Weddle
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 9.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: Current concepts.

Authors:  Evangelos P Misiakos; George Bagias; Theodore Liakakos; Anastasios Machairas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-16

10.  Prognostic scoring system of laparoscopic splenectomy in children with benign hematological diseases, a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad Gharieb Khirallah; Ibrahim Ali Kabbash; Nagi Ebrahim El-Dessouki
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.