Literature DB >> 21718990

Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.

Denise V D'Angelo1, Nedra Whitehead, Kristen Helms, Wanda Barfield, Indu B Ahluwalia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study birth outcomes among live born infants conceived by women who used infertility treatment.
DESIGN: Population-based surveillance of women who recently delivered a live infant.
SETTING: The birth outcomes among infants whose mothers used assisted reproductive technology (ART) or ovulation stimulation medications alone were compared with the outcomes of infants conceived without treatment. PATIENT(S): Stratified random sample of women who were attempting conception and gave birth to a live infant in six US states (n = 16,748). INTERVENTION(S): Assisted reproductive technology and ovulation stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adjusted odds ratios for perinatal outcomes. RESULT(S): The prevalence of infertility treatment use overall among women attempting conception was 10.9% (5.4% ART procedures, 5.5% ovulation stimulation medications). Singletons of mothers who received ART procedures were more likely to be born with low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age (SGA) than singleton infants conceived without treatment. Singleton infants of mothers who used ovulation stimulation medications alone were more likely to be SGA than singleton infants conceived without treatment. No differences were found between ART and no treatment twin infants. CONCLUSION(S): Among singleton infants, ART is associated with decreased fetal growth, decreased gestational length, and SGA; ovulation stimulation alone is associated with SGA. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21718990     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  29 in total

1.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Placental imprinting variation associated with assisted reproductive technologies and subfertility.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Maya A Deyssenroth; Todd M Everson; David A Armstrong; Luca Lambertini; Jia Chen; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Michael Tobias; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Epigenetically regulated imprinted gene expression associated with IVF and infertility: possible influence of prenatal stress and depression.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Nikhil Joshi; Dmitry Kissin; John E Anderson; Donna Session; Maurizio Macaluso; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas.

Authors:  Galit Levi Dunietz; Claudia Holzman; Patricia McKane; Chenxi Li; Sheree L Boulet; David Todem; Dmitry M Kissin; Glenn Copeland; Dana Bernson; William M Sappenfield; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Cardiometabolic health of children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Charlotte Druschel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Assisted reproductive technologies and children's neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Authors:  Mary L Hediger; Erin M Bell; Charlotte M Druschel; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Sheree L Boulet; Navid Esfandiari; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Regan N Theiler; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.