Literature DB >> 18083065

Adjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen according to centrally-assessed ERBB2 status for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: supplementary results from the BIG 1-98 randomised trial.

Birgitte B Rasmussen1, Meredith M Regan, Anne E Lykkesfeldt, Patrizia Dell'Orto, Barbara Del Curto, Katrine L Henriksen, Mauro G Mastropasqua, Karen N Price, Eliane Méry, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Stephen Braye, Hans J Altermatt, Richard D Gelber, Monica Castiglione-Gertsch, Aron Goldhirsch, Barry A Gusterson, Beat Thürlimann, Alan S Coates, Giuseppe Viale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial (a randomised double-blind phase III trial) has shown that letrozole significantly improves disease-free survival (DFS) compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Our aim was to establish whether the benefit of letrozole versus tamoxifen differs according to the ERBB2 status of tumours.
METHODS: The BIG 1-98 trial consists of four treatment groups that compare 5 years of monotherapy with letrozole or tamoxifen, and sequential administration of one drug for 2 years followed by the other drug for 3 years. Our study includes data from the 4922 patients randomly assigned to the two monotherapy treatment groups (letrozole or tamoxifen for 5 years; 51 months median follow-up [range <1 to 90 months]). A central assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and ERBB2 status using paraffin-embedded primary tumour material was possible for 3650 (74%) patients. ER, PgR, and ERBB2 expression were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and ERBB2-positivity was confirmed by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH). Positive staining in at least 1% of cells was considered to show presence of ER or PgR expression. Tumours were deemed ERBB2-positive if amplified by FISH, or, for the few tumours with unassessable or unavailable FISH results, if they were IHC 3+. Hazard ratios (HR) estimated by Cox modelling were used to compare letrozole with tamoxifen for DFS, which was the primary endpoint, and to assess treatment-by-covariate interactions. The BIG 1-98 trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the US National Cancer Institute website http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00004205.
FINDINGS: By central assessment 7% (257 of 3650) of tumours were classified as ERBB2-positive. In 3533 patients with tumours confirmed to express ER, DFS was poorer in patients with ERBB2-positive tumours (n=239) than in those with ERBB2-negative tumours (n=3294; HR 2.09 [95% CI 1.59-2.76]; p<0.0001). There was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect according to ERBB2 status of the tumour (p=0.60 for interaction), thus, letrozole improves DFS compared with tamoxifen regardless of ERBB2 status. The observed HRs were 0.62 (95% CI 0.37-1.03) for ERBB2-positive tumours and 0.72 (0.59-0.87) for ERBB2-negative tumours.
INTERPRETATION: A benefit of letrozole over tamoxifen was noted, irrespective of ERBB2 status of the tumour, and, therefore, ERBB2 status does not seem to be a selection criterion for treatment with letrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18083065     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70386-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  50 in total

Review 1.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Poor-prognosis estrogen receptor- positive disease: present and future clinical solutions.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  A kinase inhibitor screen identifies Mcl-1 and Aurora kinase A as novel treatment targets in antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  S Thrane; A M Pedersen; M B H Thomsen; T Kirkegaard; B B Rasmussen; A K Duun-Henriksen; A V Lænkholm; M Bak; A E Lykkesfeldt; C W Yde
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Therapeutic potential of the dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor AZD8931 in circumventing endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Gladys Morrison; Xiaoyong Fu; Martin Shea; Sarmistha Nanda; Mario Giuliano; Tao Wang; Teresa Klinowska; C Kent Osborne; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed Ki-67 labeling index in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: results from Breast International Group Trial 1-98 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with letrozole.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Meredith M Regan; Alan S Coates; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Eugenio Maiorano; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Stephen G Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Wojciech P Olszewski; Fiona Knox; Beat Thürlimann; Karen N Price; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Barry A Gusterson; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Update on the use of aromatase inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Kesisis; Andreas Makris; David Miles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Molecular risk assessment of BIG 1-98 participants by expression profiling using RNA from archival tissue.

Authors:  Janine Antonov; Vlad Popovici; Mauro Delorenzi; Pratyaksha Wirapati; Anna Baltzer; Andrea Oberli; Beat Thürlimann; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Giuseppe Viale; Hans Jörg Altermatt; Stefan Aebi; Rolf Jaggi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Predicting benefit of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  The Gene expression Grade Index: a potential predictor of relapse for endocrine-treated breast cancer patients in the BIG 1-98 trial.

Authors:  Christine Desmedt; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Patrick Neven; Robert Paridaens; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Ann Smeets; Françoise Lallemand; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Giuseppe Viale; Richard D Gelber; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Nuclear receptor co-activators and HER-2/neu are upregulated in breast cancer patients during neo-adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  M Hauglid Flågeng; L L Haugan Moi; J M Dixon; J Geisler; E A Lien; W R Miller; P E Lønning; G Mellgren
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.