| Literature DB >> 21718500 |
Markus Krupp1, Thorsten Maass, Jens U Marquardt, Frank Staib, Tobias Bauer, Rainer König, Stefan Biesterfeld, Peter R Galle, Achim Tresch, Andreas Teufel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer cells are characterized by massive dysegulation of physiological cell functions with considerable disruption of transcriptional regulation. Genome-wide transcriptome profiling can be utilized for early detection and molecular classification of cancers. Accurate discrimination of functionally different tumor types may help to guide selection of targeted therapy in translational research. Concise grouping of tumor types in cancer maps according to their molecular profile may further be helpful for the development of new therapeutic modalities or open new avenues for already established therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21718500 PMCID: PMC3148554 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Figure 1Schematic drawing of the workflow - a) gene expression data, b) functional data and c) the functional cancer map.
Figure 2Functional cancer map: Functional expression profile of significant enriched KEGG pathway maps across 28 tumor entities assigned to 16 tumor classes. The significance of a tumor entity to a KEGG pathway map is symbolized by the diameter of the spot, the greater the diameter the more significant enriched is the corresponding tumor entity - KEGG pathway map relation. The color of the spot gives information on the tumor entity and its belonging tumor class. Information on the KEGG classification schema is supported by the color gradient on the left side.
Figure 3Tumor phylogeny: Calculation of the tumor phylogeny was done by applying the Cohen's Kappa Coefficient to the binarized functional cancer map, tumor entities - KEGG pathway map relations respectfully.
The tumor sample distribution of the 649 microarrays with corresponding controls among the tumor classes and tumor entities used in our analysis
| Tumor class | Tumor entity | Analyzed Controls | Number of Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Peripheral Blood, Grade Pre-B | Stratagene | 9 |
| Bone marrow | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Bone Marrow, Grade Common | Stratagene | 35 |
| Bone marrow | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Bone Marrow, Grade Pre-B | Stratagene | 33 |
| Bone | Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma | CRH | 10 |
| Breast | Breast Carcinoma | Stratagene | 94 |
| Breast | Breast Carcinoma Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, Grade 2 | Stratagene | 31 |
| Breast | Breast Carcinoma Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, Grade 3 | Stratagene | 19 |
| Breast | Breast Carcinoma Invasive Lobular Carcinoma, Grade 2 | Stratagene | 19 |
| Liver | Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Stratagene | 19 |
| Lymhpocytes | Follicular Lymphoma | CRG | 24 |
| Mixture | Solitary Fibrous Tumor | CRG | 7 |
| Muscle | Leiomyosarcoma | CRG | 7 |
| Ovarian | Ovarian Carcinoma | CRD | 39 |
| Pancreas | Adenocarcinoma, Pancreas | CRH | 10 |
| Pancreas | Adenocarcinoma, Pancreas, Grade II | CRH | 5 |
| Pancreas | Adenocarcinoma, Pancreas, Grade III | CRH | 6 |
| Prostate | Prostate Tumor, Grade T2b | Stratagene | 23 |
| Prostate | Prostate Tumor, Grade T3a | Stratagene | 19 |
| Prostate | Prostate Tumor, Grade T3b | Stratagene | 9 |
| Renal | Conventional Renal Cell Carcinoma, Grade 1 | Stratagene | 9 |
| Renal | Conventional Renal Cell Carcinoma, Grade 2 | Stratagene | 34 |
| Renal | Conventional Renal Cell Carcinoma, Grade 3 | Stratagene | 94 |
| Renal | Conventional Renal Cell Carcinoma, Grade 4 | Stratagene | 40 |
| Skin | Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans | CRG | 6 |
| Soft Tissue | Synovial Sarcoma | CRG | 5 |
| Stomach | Stomach Cancer Before Treatment | CRF | 14 |
| Stomach | Stomach Cancer, Placebo After 1 Year | CRF | 13 |
| Testis | Testis Seminoma | CRG | 16 |