ISSUE ADDRESSED: This study investigated the application of an educational health promotion program, the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSM), within three Queensland Aboriginal (Murri) communities (rural, regional and urban). METHODS: A participant-observation approach was used and qualitative data was collected through interviews and focus groups. A total of 39 people participated, al of whom had been exposed to the program in different ways (i.e. leaders, health professionals, Elders who sponsored the program) during its recent deployment in their communities. RESULTS: Across all three regions, Aboriginal engagement in the program was found to be influenced by core factors that are well known and reflect our general understanding about Aboriginal history (e.g. the impact of negative medica interactions, the lack of cultural competence, the use of culturally insensitive methods of service delivery, the collectivity of Murri life and the holistic concept of health). However, a more important finding was that irrespective of these broad factors, the acceptability of the program in each community depended on the extent to which it had embraced and espoused several localised processes. The impact and nature of these processes differed across each region. CONCLUSIONS: Four local processes reflected the unique characteristics and profile of each community.They included the need to be responsive to local systems and structures, to incorporate local cultural traditions and knowledge bases, to use locally accepted forms of cultural communication, and to facilitate oca community participation and leadership in the program. Importantly, these factors determined the experience of the program within each community, ultimately influencing its acceptability, effectiveness and sustainability.
ISSUE ADDRESSED: This study investigated the application of an educational health promotion program, the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSM), within three Queensland Aboriginal (Murri) communities (rural, regional and urban). METHODS: A participant-observation approach was used and qualitative data was collected through interviews and focus groups. A total of 39 people participated, al of whom had been exposed to the program in different ways (i.e. leaders, health professionals, Elders who sponsored the program) during its recent deployment in their communities. RESULTS: Across all three regions, Aboriginal engagement in the program was found to be influenced by core factors that are well known and reflect our general understanding about Aboriginal history (e.g. the impact of negative medica interactions, the lack of cultural competence, the use of culturally insensitive methods of service delivery, the collectivity of Murri life and the holistic concept of health). However, a more important finding was that irrespective of these broad factors, the acceptability of the program in each community depended on the extent to which it had embraced and espoused several localised processes. The impact and nature of these processes differed across each region. CONCLUSIONS: Four local processes reflected the unique characteristics and profile of each community.They included the need to be responsive to local systems and structures, to incorporate local cultural traditions and knowledge bases, to use locally accepted forms of cultural communication, and to facilitate oca community participation and leadership in the program. Importantly, these factors determined the experience of the program within each community, ultimately influencing its acceptability, effectiveness and sustainability.
Authors: Sarah Allen; Suzanne Held; Shauna Milne-Price; Alma McCormick; Du Feng; Jillian Inouye; Mark Schure; Dottie Castille; Rae B Howe; Mikayla Pitts; Shannen Keene; Lorenda Belone; Nina Wallerstein Journal: Am J Community Psychol Date: 2021-09-17
Authors: Shingisai Chando; Martin Howell; Christian Young; Jonathan C Craig; Sandra J Eades; Michelle Dickson; Kirsten Howard Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Cylie M Williams; Elizabeth H Skinner; Alicia M James; Jill L Cook; Steven M McPhail; Terry P Haines Journal: Trials Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Angela Durey; Suzanne McEvoy; Val Swift-Otero; Kate Taylor; Judith Katzenellenbogen; Dawn Bessarab Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 2.655