Literature DB >> 21717498

Comparison of two methods for measuring the pubococcygeal line from sagittal-plane magnetic resonance imaging.

Stéphanie Madill1, An Tang, Stéphanie Pontbriand-Drolet, Chantal Dumoulin.   

Abstract

AIMS: The pubococcygeal line (PCL) is an important reference line for determining measures of pelvic organ support on sagittal-plane magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, there is no consensus on where to place the posterior point of the PCL. As coccyx movement produced during pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions may affect other measures, optimal placement of the posterior point is important. This study compared two methods for measuring the PCL, with different posterior points, on T2-weighted sagittal MRI to determine the effect of coccygeal movement on measures of pelvic organ support in older women.
METHODS: MRI of the pelvis was performed in the midsagittal plane, at rest and during PFM contractions, on 47 community-dwelling women 60 and over. The first PCL was measured to the tip of the coccyx (PCLtip) and the second to the sacrococcygeal joint (PCLjnt). Four measures of pelvic organ support were made using each PCL as the reference line: urethrovesical junction height, uterovaginal junction height, M-line and levator plate angle.
RESULTS: During the PFM contraction the PCLtip shortened and lifted (P < 0.001); the PCLjnt did not change (P > 0.05). The changes in the four measures of pelvic organ support were smaller when measured relative to the PCLtip as compared to those to the PCLjnt (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Coccyx movement affected the length and position of the PCLtip, which resulted in underestimates of the pelvic-organ lift produced by the PFM contraction. Therefore, we recommend that the PCL be measured to the sacrococcygeal joint and not to the tip of the coccyx.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717498     DOI: 10.1002/nau.21079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  3 in total

1.  Pelvic Floor Morphometric Differences in Elderly Women with or without Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Sarah Fradet; Mélanie Morin; Jennifer Kruger; Chantale Dumoulin
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Dynamic MR of the pelvic floor: Influence of alternative methods to draw the pubococcygeal line (PCL) on the grading of pelvic floor descent.

Authors:  Simona Picchia; Marco Rengo; Davide Bellini; Damiano Caruso; Eliseo Pironti; Roberto Floris; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Three novel methods to measure the postoperative displacement of lower urinary tract structures following radical prostatectomy in a sample of Korean patients.

Authors:  Hong Koo Ha; Henk B Luiting; Petra L Graham; Manish I Patel; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Sean F Mungovan
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.