Literature DB >> 21717301

Should the dose of contrast medium be determined solely on the basis of body weight regardless of the patient's sex?

Junji Tanaka1, Eito Kozawa, Kaiji Inoue, Yasumasa Okamoto, Masahito Toya, Youichi Sato.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the difference in contrast enhancement of liver parenchyma between male and female subjects when the total amount of contrast material is determined by the total body weight (TBW).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography of the abdomen was performed with a total amount of iodine of 597 ± 3.9 mg I/kg (mean ± SD) over a mean ± SD total injection time of 30 ± 0.26 s. Postcontrast attenuation during the portal venous phase was measured in the liver parenchyma, portal vein, and aorta. These values were summed for each and compared to those obtained before contrast injection. A total of 565 consecutive patients without a history of underlying liver/heart disease, including 297 male and 268 female subjects (age 16-92 years, mean 67 years) were scanned and analyzed using a two-tailed t-test.
RESULTS: The difference between precontrast and the portal venous phase in the male subjects was 315.4 ± 40.5 HU (mean ± SD), and that in female subjects was 358.6 ± 44.8 HU. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The contrast enhancement in females was 13.7% higher than that in males when the amount of iodine administered was based on the TBW. The difference can presumably be attributed to the difference in fat and muscle components. This result suggests that the amount of contrast material used in females should be reduced according to this difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717301     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-011-0563-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  15 in total

1.  Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT of liver: contrast-enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patients' body-weight-tailored dose of contrast material.

Authors:  Tomoaki Ichikawa; Sukru Mehmet Erturk; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Body mass index and body energy stores in developing countries.

Authors:  N G Norgan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Should clearance be normalised to body surface or to lean body mass?

Authors:  T H Hallynck; H H Soep; J A Thomis; J Boelaert; R Daneels; L Dettli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Prediction of lean body mass from height and weight.

Authors:  R Hume
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Body size indexes for optimizing iodine dose for aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: comparison of total body weight, lean body weight, and blood volume.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kondo; Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Yuhei Tomita; Myeong-Jin Kim; Noriyuki Moriyama; Minoru Onozuka; Yoshimune Shiratori; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Bone, muscle, and fat: sex-related differences in prepubertal children.

Authors:  Kiumars Arfai; Pisit D Pitukcheewanont; Michael I Goran; C Jane Tavare; Linda Heller; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Determining contrast medium dose and rate on basis of lean body weight: does this strategy improve patient-to-patient uniformity of hepatic enhancement during multi-detector row CT?

Authors:  Lisa M Ho; Rendon C Nelson; David M Delong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Kumiko Hiraishi; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols.

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Elisa Rosati; Nicola Panvini; Marco Rengo; Davide Bellini; Giulia Moltoni; Benedetta Bracci; Elena Lucertini; Marta Zerunian; Michela Polici; Domenico De Santis; Elsa Iannicelli; Paolo Anibaldi; Iacopo Carbone; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-03-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.