BACKGROUND: This study was intended to compare the prognostic power of the number of positive lymph nodes with that of the lymph node ratio in patients with ampullary carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the medical records of 71 consecutive patients with ampullary carcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with regional lymph node dissection. A total of 2151 lymph nodes were dissected (median: 28 nodes per patient) and examined histologically. Cutoff points were determined for both the number of positive nodes and the lymph node ratio using χ(2) scores calculated with the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was found in 34 patients. The best cutoff point for the number of positive nodes was identified as three nodes, and that for the lymph node ratio was identified as 10%. Univariate analysis revealed both the number of positive nodes (0, 1-3, or ≥ 4; P < 0.0001) and the lymph node ratio (0%, 0-10%, or >10%; P < 0.0001) as significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified the number of positive nodes as an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001), whereas the lymph node ratio failed to remain as an independent variable. The cumulative 5-year survival rates were 85% for patients with 0 positive nodes, 63% for patients with 1-3 positive nodes, and 0% for patients with ≥ 4 positive nodes (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of positive lymph nodes better predicts the outcome after resection than the lymph node ratio in patients with ampullary carcinoma.
BACKGROUND: This study was intended to compare the prognostic power of the number of positive lymph nodes with that of the lymph node ratio in patients with ampullary carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the medical records of 71 consecutive patients with ampullary carcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with regional lymph node dissection. A total of 2151 lymph nodes were dissected (median: 28 nodes per patient) and examined histologically. Cutoff points were determined for both the number of positive nodes and the lymph node ratio using χ(2) scores calculated with the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was found in 34 patients. The best cutoff point for the number of positive nodes was identified as three nodes, and that for the lymph node ratio was identified as 10%. Univariate analysis revealed both the number of positive nodes (0, 1-3, or ≥ 4; P < 0.0001) and the lymph node ratio (0%, 0-10%, or >10%; P < 0.0001) as significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified the number of positive nodes as an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001), whereas the lymph node ratio failed to remain as an independent variable. The cumulative 5-year survival rates were 85% for patients with 0 positive nodes, 63% for patients with 1-3 positive nodes, and 0% for patients with ≥ 4 positive nodes (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of positive lymph nodes better predicts the outcome after resection than the lymph node ratio in patients with ampullary carcinoma.
Authors: Robert Rosenberg; Jan Friederichs; Tibor Schuster; Ralf Gertler; Matthias Maak; Karen Becker; Anne Grebner; Kurt Ulm; Heinz Höfler; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Vassiliki L Tsikitis; David L Larson; Bruce G Wolff; Gregory Kennedy; Nancy Diehl; Rui Qin; Eric J Dozois; Robert R Cima Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alberto Marchet; Simone Mocellin; Alessandro Ambrosi; Paolo Morgagni; Domenico Garcea; Daniele Marrelli; Franco Roviello; Giovanni de Manzoni; Annamaria Minicozzi; Giovanni Natalini; Francesco De Santis; Luca Baiocchi; Arianna Coniglio; Donato Nitti Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: C A M Sommerville; P Limongelli; M Pai; R Ahmad; G Stamp; N A Habib; R C N Williamson; L R Jiao Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Lauren M Postlewait; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Grace E Kim; Alyssa Krasinskas; Hyejeong Choi; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica H Knight; Michael Goodman; Gizem Akkas; Michelle D Reid; Shishir K Maithel; Volkan Adsay Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ibrahim Nassour; Alana Christie; Michael A Choti; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew M Augustine; Matthew R Porembka; Xian-Jin Xie; Sam C Wang Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Christina L Roland; Matthew H G Katz; Graciela M N Gonzalez; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert A Wolff; Christopher H Crane; Jeffrey E Lee; Jason B Fleming Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 3.452