Mohammad A B Al-Freah1, Edward J Gane2, Vicki Livingstone3, John McCall2, Stephen Munn2. 1. The New Zealand Liver Transpalnt Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. alfreah@yahoo.com. 2. The New Zealand Liver Transpalnt Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Department of Community Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is found to be a robust predictor of mortality while on waiting list for liver transplantation. However, studies have shown inconsistent results for transplant MELD as a predictor of posttransplant mortality. AIM: To find whether utilization of MELD at listing, at transplant, or Δ MELD while waiting can predict outcome at a national transplant center, which is not part of an organ sharing network. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of patients listed for liver transplantation at the New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit (NZLTU) with calculation of MELD score at the time of listing and at transplant with/without adjustment points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2005, 264 adult patients were listed for liver transplantation. Median age at transplant was 49 years (range 16-70) and 65% were male. The most common etiology was viral hepatitis (50%). A total of 48 patients (20%) had known HCC. MELD scores (adjusted and nonadjusted) at listing and at transplantation were similar across all primary liver diseases (P = 0.88, 0.93, respectively). Adjusted MELD scores were significantly higher in patients listed for HCC compared to those without HCC (P < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval = 1.21-1.46). MELD scores at transplant did not correlate with either 3 or 12 months mortality (P = 0.336, 0.228, respectively). This finding was consistent whether the change of MELD during waiting time was >1 point or less (P = 0.67). Waiting time does not appear to influence posttransplant survival (P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: In a country with a single transplant center and organ retrieval organization, the addition of MELD score to current minimal listing criteria does not improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list or predict posttransplant survival. Also, adjusting MELD score for HCC would unfairly disadvantage patients listed without HCC.
OBJECTIVE: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is found to be a robust predictor of mortality while on waiting list for liver transplantation. However, studies have shown inconsistent results for transplant MELD as a predictor of posttransplant mortality. AIM: To find whether utilization of MELD at listing, at transplant, or Δ MELD while waiting can predict outcome at a national transplant center, which is not part of an organ sharing network. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of patients listed for liver transplantation at the New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit (NZLTU) with calculation of MELD score at the time of listing and at transplant with/without adjustment points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2005, 264 adult patients were listed for liver transplantation. Median age at transplant was 49 years (range 16-70) and 65% were male. The most common etiology was viral hepatitis (50%). A total of 48 patients (20%) had known HCC. MELD scores (adjusted and nonadjusted) at listing and at transplantation were similar across all primary liver diseases (P = 0.88, 0.93, respectively). Adjusted MELD scores were significantly higher in patients listed for HCC compared to those without HCC (P < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval = 1.21-1.46). MELD scores at transplant did not correlate with either 3 or 12 months mortality (P = 0.336, 0.228, respectively). This finding was consistent whether the change of MELD during waiting time was >1 point or less (P = 0.67). Waiting time does not appear to influence posttransplant survival (P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: In a country with a single transplant center and organ retrieval organization, the addition of MELD score to current minimal listing criteria does not improve prioritization of patients on the waiting list or predict posttransplant survival. Also, adjusting MELD score for HCC would unfairly disadvantage patients listed without HCC.
Authors: R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: G Fernández-Esparrach; A Sánchez-Fueyo; P Ginès; J Uriz; L Quintó; P J Ventura; A Cárdenas; M Guevara; P Sort; W Jiménez; R Bataller; V Arroyo; J Rodés Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Kim M Olthoff; Robert S Brown; Francis L Delmonico; Richard B Freeman; Sue V McDiarmid; Robert M Merion; J Michael Millis; John P Roberts; Abraham Shaked; Russell H Wiesner; Michael R Lucey Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Niraj M Desai; Kevin C Mange; Michael D Crawford; Peter L Abt; Adam M Frank; Joseph W Markmann; Ergun Velidedeoglu; William C Chapman; James F Markmann Journal: Transplantation Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A Maroto; A Ginès; J Saló; J Clària; P Ginès; L Anibarro; W Jiménez; V Arroyo; J Rodés Journal: Hepatology Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Nicholas N Onaca; Marlon F Levy; Edmund Q Sanchez; Srinath Chinnakotla; Carlos G Fasola; Mark J Thomas; Jeffrey S Weinstein; Natalie G Murray; Robert M Goldstein; Goran B Klintmalm Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Dawn M Dykstra; Alan B Leichtman; Brenda Gillespie; Philip J Held Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Russell Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Richard Freeman; Ann Harper; Ray Kim; Patrick Kamath; Walter Kremers; John Lake; Todd Howard; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Ruud Krom Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Yun Shin Chun; Ronnie T P Poon; Myron E Schwartz; Francis Y Yao; J Wallis Marsh; Sherrie Bhoori; Sung-Gyu Lee Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 5.344