| Literature DB >> 21716672 |
Fang-Rong Yan1, Jin-Guan Lin, Yu Liu.
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to find out the quantitative relationship between progression of liver fibrosis and the levels of certain serum markers using mathematic model. We provide the sparse logistic regression by using smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) penalized function to diagnose the liver fibrosis in rats. Not only does it give a sparse solution with high accuracy, it also provides the users with the precise probabilities of classification with the class information. In the simulative case and the experiment case, the proposed method is comparable to the stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SLDA) and the sparse logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty, by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with bayesian bootstrap estimating area under the curve (AUC) diagnostic sensitivity for selected variable. Results show that the new approach provides a good correlation between the serum marker levels and the liver fibrosis induced by thioacetamide (TAA) in rats. Meanwhile, this approach might also be used in predicting the development of liver cirrhosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21716672 PMCID: PMC3118301 DOI: 10.1155/2011/875309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
True classification ratio simulations results.
| SLDA | SLR-LASSO | SLR-SCAD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedTrue | MeanTrue | MedTrue | MeanTrue | MedTrue | MeanTrue | |
| 20 | 0.95 | 0.9335 | 0.9 | 0.8559 | 0.9 | 0.8974 |
| 40 | 0.95 | 0.9558 | 0.925 | 0.9285 | 0.925 | 0.9254 |
| 60 | 0.9667 | 0.9657 | 0.9667 | 0.9546 | 0.95 | 0.9488 |
| 100 | 0.98 | 0.9728 | 0.98 | 0.9729 | 0.98 | 0.9687 |
SLDA: stepwise linear discriminant analysis.
SLR-LASSO: sparse logistics regression-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.
SLR-SCAD: sparse logistics regression-smoothly clipped absolute deviation penalty.
Figure 1Progression of TAA-induced liver fibrosis in SD rats was assessed by HE and Masson-Trichrome staining at different time points of treatment. (a–c) HE staining, (a) Nomal, (b) 8 w Model, and (c) 12 w Model, (d–f) Masson-trichrome staining, (d) Nomal, (e) 8 w Mode, and (f) 12 w Mode.
The content of determined parameters in the serum during TAA induction (x ± s).
| Group | (A/T) | ( AST) | (Hyp) | (IVC) | ( LN ) | (PC-III) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (IU/L) | (ng/mL) | (ng/mL) | (ng/mL) | (ng/mL) | |
| Normal | 46.53 ± 12.13 | 36.80 ± 6.94 | 137.14 ± 12.98 | 18.14 ± 3.08 | 10.28 ± 7.49 | 7.44 ± 4.38 |
| Model | 40.45 ± 11.40 | 54.09 ± 13.26 | 193.96 ± 14.29** | 21.60 ± 4.07** | 17.78 ± 6.68** | 10.88 ± 3.25** |
| Group | (Col I) | (HA) | (T.Bil) | (A/G) | (Alb) | (TP) |
| (ng/mL) | (ng/mL) | (ng/mL) | (%) | (mg/mL) | (mg/mL) | |
| Normal | 31.48 ± 5.27 | 5.26 ± 5.49 | 5.55 ± 1.19 | 83.99 ± 14.45 | 37.27 ± 11.56 | 79.62 ± 8.64 |
| Model | 48.10 ± 14.68** | 16.86 ± 8.6** | 4.91 ± 1.75 | 73.52 ± 11.92 | 32.09 ± 9.62 | 79.28 ± 7.69 |
**P < .05, compared to the normal group.
The level of AST in liver tissue during induction (x ± s).
| Group | Week | AST (IU/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 8 w | 37.33 ± 6.94 |
| 12 w | 36.27 ± 6.21 | |
| Model | 8 w | 67.37 ± 8.83** |
| 12 w | 40.8 ± 7.26 |
**P < .05, compared to the normal group.
Figure 2The change of AST during induction.
List of covariates for plasma markers.
| Covariates | Plasma markers |
|---|---|
| Diagnosis the degree liver fibrosis by using the pathological diagnosis | |
| Albumin ratio of total protein (A/T) | |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) | |
| Hydroxyproline (Hyp) | |
| IV collagen (IVC) | |
| Serum laminin (LN ) | |
| III collagen (PC-III) | |
| I collagen (Col I) | |
| Hyaluronan (HA) | |
| Total Bilirubin (T.Bil) | |
| Albumin ratio of the globulin (A/G) | |
| Albumin (Alb) | |
| Total protein (TP) |
List of variable selection results.
| SLDA | SLR-LASSO | SLR-SCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyproline | Hydroxyproline | Hydroxyproline |
| I collagen | LN | LN |
| Hyaluronan | IV | — |
| — | Hyaluronan | — |
List of classification true rates.
| SLDA | SLR-LASSO | SLR-SCAD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification true rates (%) | 96.15 | 92.31 | 96.15 |
ROC curve analysis.
| AUC | 0.3134 | 0.5869 | 0.7989 | 0.1685 | 0.7632 | 0.3450 |
| AUC | 0.6510 | 0.8173 | 0.3729 | 0.3169 | 0.3733 | 0.4569 |
Figure 3BB estimates of ROC curves for diagnostic covariates for markers.