BACKGROUND: Determining the stage of fibrosis by liver biopsy is important in managing patients with hepatitis C virus infection. We investigated the predictive value of the proprietary FibroTest score to accurately identify significant fibrosis in Australian hepatitis C patients. METHODS: Serum obtained from 125 confirmed hepatitis C patients before antiviral therapy was analyzed for haptoglobin, alpha(2)-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, bilirubin, and gamma-glutamyltransferase activity, and the FibroTest score was computed. Liver fibrosis pathology was staged according to a defined system on a scale of F0 to F4. We used predictive values and a ROC curve to assess the accuracy of FibroTest scores. RESULTS: The prevalence of significant fibrosis defined by liver biopsy was 0.38. The most useful single test for predicting significant fibrosis was serum alpha(2)-macroglobulin (cutoff value, 2.52 g/L; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 67%). The negative predictive value of a FibroTest score <0.1 was 85%, and the positive predictive value of a score >0.6 was 78%. Although 33 of the 125 patients had FibroTest scores <0.1 and were therefore deemed unlikely to have fibrosis, 6 (18%) had significant fibrosis. Conversely, of the 24 patients with scores >0.6 who were likely to have significant fibrosis, 5 (21%) had mild fibrosis. Of the 125 patients in the cohort, 57 (46%) could have avoided liver biopsy, but discrepant results were recorded in 11 of those 57 (19%). CONCLUSION: The FibroTest score could not accurately predict the presence or absence of significant liver fibrosis.
BACKGROUND: Determining the stage of fibrosis by liver biopsy is important in managing patients with hepatitis C virus infection. We investigated the predictive value of the proprietary FibroTest score to accurately identify significant fibrosis in Australian hepatitis Cpatients. METHODS: Serum obtained from 125 confirmed hepatitis C patients before antiviral therapy was analyzed for haptoglobin, alpha(2)-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein A1, bilirubin, and gamma-glutamyltransferase activity, and the FibroTest score was computed. Liver fibrosis pathology was staged according to a defined system on a scale of F0 to F4. We used predictive values and a ROC curve to assess the accuracy of FibroTest scores. RESULTS: The prevalence of significant fibrosis defined by liver biopsy was 0.38. The most useful single test for predicting significant fibrosis was serum alpha(2)-macroglobulin (cutoff value, 2.52 g/L; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 67%). The negative predictive value of a FibroTest score <0.1 was 85%, and the positive predictive value of a score >0.6 was 78%. Although 33 of the 125 patients had FibroTest scores <0.1 and were therefore deemed unlikely to have fibrosis, 6 (18%) had significant fibrosis. Conversely, of the 24 patients with scores >0.6 who were likely to have significant fibrosis, 5 (21%) had mild fibrosis. Of the 125 patients in the cohort, 57 (46%) could have avoided liver biopsy, but discrepant results were recorded in 11 of those 57 (19%). CONCLUSION: The FibroTest score could not accurately predict the presence or absence of significant liver fibrosis.
Authors: J Macías; J A Girón-González; M González-Serrano; D Merino; P Cano; J A Mira; A Arizcorreta-Yarza; J Ruíz-Morales; J M Lomas-Cabeza; J A García-García; J E Corzo; J A Pineda Journal: Gut Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Dana Lau-Corona; Luís Alberto Pineda; Héctor Hugo Avilés; Gabriela Gutiérrez-Reyes; Blanca Eugenia Farfan-Labonne; Rafael Núñez-Nateras; Alan Bonder; Rosalinda Martínez-García; Clara Corona-Lau; Marco Antonio Olivera-Martínez; Maria-Concepción Gutiérrez-Ruiz; Guillermo Robles-Díaz; David Kershenobich Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Saurabh Sethi; Douglas A Simonetto; Soha S Abdelmoneim; Michael B Campion; Irakli Kaloiani; Amy C Clayton; Walter K Kremers; Kevin C Halling; Patrick S Kamath; Jayant Talwalkar; Vijay H Shah Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2012-04-12