Literature DB >> 21716049

Factors influencing persistence or recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Radha Malapati1, Sushma Chaparala, Helen E Cejtin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of persistent or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) procedure in an urban population of low socioeconomic status.
METHODS: A database was created using information about LEEPs done between October 2004 and December 2008 at John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital, Cook County. This information was then analyzed using χ2 test to determine the predictors of persistent or recurrent CIN.
RESULTS: A total of 769 LEEPs were performed during the study period, and 52 were excluded secondary to ineligible entries, index cytology report not recorded, or incorrect medical record numbers. Persistent or recurrent disease was defined as cytology of atypical squamous cells cannot rule out high grade lesion (ASC-H) or worse without a histology, or histology of CIN 1 or worse, at any time after the LEEP was performed. Of our study population, 64.7% had a follow-up cytology or biopsy performed. Of these women, 24.7% had persistent or recurrent disease. The preoperative factors, namely positive human immunodeficiency virus serostatus (p < .0001) and a preoperative endocervical curettage that was positive for neoplasia (p < .0001), and postoperative factors, namely positive margin status (p < .0001) and high-grade pathology on the LEEP specimen (p < .0001), were significantly associated with persistent or recurrent disease. A high-grade preoperative cytology, a high-grade preoperative cervical biopsy, or the type of procedure performed (single specimen or separate endocervical pass) was not significantly associated with persistent or recurrent disease.
CONCLUSIONS: In our population, adherence with follow-up was poor, and the rate of persistence or recurrence was high. In a limited resource setting such as ours, patients with significant predictors of persistence/recurrence such as human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity, endocervical disease, and high-grade pathology or positive margins on LEEP specimens should be targeted for closer surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21716049     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181fee61d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Factors Affecting Margin Positivity and Persistent Disease After Leep for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Anila Tresa Alukal; P Rema; S Suchetha; Dhanya Dinesh; Aleyamma Mathew; K M Jagathnath Krishna; Thara Somanathan; J Sivaranjith
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-12

2.  Factors associated with recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ after treatment among HIV-infected women in Western Kenya.

Authors:  Megan J Huchko; Hannah Leslie; May Maloba; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Conization Using an Electrosurgical Knife for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Microinvasive Carcinoma.

Authors:  Libing Xiang; Jiajia Li; Wentao Yang; Xiaoli Xu; Xiaohua Wu; Huaying Wang; Ziting Li; Huijuan Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recurrence of cervical intraepithelial lesions after thermo-coagulation in HIV-positive and HIV-negative Nigerian women.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Oga; Jessica P Brown; Clayton Brown; Eileen Dareng; Victor Adekanmbi; Michael Odutola; Olayinka Olaniyan; Richard Offiong; Kayode Obende; Ayodele Stephen Adewole; Achara Peter; Patrick Dakum; Clement Adebamowo
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Factors that influence persistence or recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with positive margins after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Menghan Zhu; Yuan He; Jan Pa Baak; Xianrong Zhou; Yuqing Qu; Long Sui; Weiwei Feng; Qing Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Invasive Carcinoma Who Underwent Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

Authors:  Jakkapan Khunnarong; Nitinan Bunyasontikul; Siriwan Tangjitgamol
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2021-07-10

7.  Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Xiufeang Liu; Lina Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Lei Li; Yalan Bi; Huanwen Wu; Ming Wu; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.