Literature DB >> 21715666

Heteronymous reflex connections in human upper limb muscles in response to stretch of forearm muscles.

Curtis D Manning1, Parveen Bawa.   

Abstract

Torque motor produced stretch of upper limb muscles results in two distinct reflex peaks in the electromyographic activity. Whereas the short-latency reflex (SLR) response is mediated largely by the spinal monosynaptic reflex pathway, the longer-latency reflex (LLR) is suggested to involve a transcortical loop. For the SLRs, patterns of heteronymous monosynaptic Ia connections have been well-studied for a large number of muscles in the cat and in humans. For LLRs, information is available for perturbations to proximal joints, although the protocols for most of these studies did not focus on heteronymous connections. The main objective of the present study was to elicit both SLRs and LLRs in wrist flexors and extensors and to examine heteronymous connections from these muscles to elbow flexors (biceps brachii; BiBr) and extensors (triceps brachii; TriBr) and to selected distal muscles, including abductor pollicis longus (APL), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and Thenars. The stretch of wrist flexors produced SLR and LLR peaks in APL, FDI, ADM, Thenars, and BiBr while simultaneously inducing inhibition of wrist extensors and TriBr. When wrist extensors were stretched, SLR and LLR peaks were observed in TriBr, whereas the primary wrist flexors, APL and BiBr, were inhibited; response patterns of FDI, ADM, and Thenars were less consistent. The main conclusions from the observed data are that: 1) as in the cat, afferents from wrist flexors and extensors make heteronymous connections with proximal and distal upper limb muscles; and 2) the strength of heteronymous connections is greater for LLRs than SLRs in the distal muscles, whereas the opposite is true for the proximal muscles. In the majority of observations, SLR and LLR excitatory peaks were observed together. However, on occasion, LLRs were observed without the SLR response in hand muscles when wrist extensors were stretched.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715666     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00084.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Multisensory components of rapid motor responses to fingertip loading.

Authors:  F Crevecoeur; A Barrea; X Libouton; J-L Thonnard; P Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Threshold position control of anticipation in humans: a possible role of corticospinal influences.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Nicolas A Turpin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent.

Authors:  E J Lockyer; R J Benson; A P Hynes; L R Alcock; A J Spence; D C Button; K E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reciprocal inhibition versus unloading response during stretch reflex in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; P L L McDonald; C D Murnaghan; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Activation and intermuscular coherence of distal arm muscles during proximal muscle contraction.

Authors:  Sang Wook Lee; Katlin Landers; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Interhemispheric inhibition is different during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction.

Authors:  Chris T Compton; Evan J Lockyer; Ryan J Benson; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Interlimb Responses to Perturbations of Bilateral Movements are Asymmetric.

Authors:  Jacob E Schaffer; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.