Literature DB >> 21715140

The use of an electronic medical record based automatic calculation tool to quantify risk of unplanned readmission to the intensive care unit: a validation study.

Subhash Chandra1, Dipti Agarwal, Andrew Hanson, Joseph C Farmer, Brian W Pickering, Ognjen Gajic, Vitaly Herasevich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to refine and validate an automatic risk of unplanned readmission (Stability and Workload Index for Transfer, or SWIFT) calculator in a prospective cohort of consecutive medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients in a teaching hospital with comprehensive electronic medical records (EMRs).
DESIGN: A 2-phase (derivation and validation) prospective cohort study was conducted. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in an academic medical ICU.
SUBJECTS: A consecutive cohort of adult (age >18 years) patients with research authorization were analyzed. INTERVENTION: The EMR-based automatic SWIFT calculator was used for this study. MEASUREMENT: Agreement between the manual ("gold standard") and automatic SWIFT calculation tool was obtained. MAIN
RESULTS: During the derivation phase, we enrolled 191 consecutive medical ICU patients. Scores of SWIFT for these patients calculated manually by the 2 reviewers had strong positive correlation (r = 0.97), and the mean (SD) difference was 0.43 (3.5). The first iteration of the automatic SWIFT calculator in the derivation cohort demonstrated excellent agreement with manual calculation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (κ = 0.95), partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (κ = 0.69), length of ICU stay (κ = 0.91), and Glasgow comma scale (κ = 0.90) and no agreement for source of ICU admission (κ = -0.15). After adjustment in rules, the κ value for hospital admission source improved to 1.0. Automatic calculation demonstrated strong correlation with manual (r = 0.92), and mean (SD) difference was -2.3 (5.9). During validation phase, 100 subjects were enrolled at 5 days. The automatic tool retained excellent correlation with gold-standard calculation for SWIFT (r = 0.92), and the mean (SD) difference was -2.2 (5.5).
CONCLUSION: The EMR-based automatic tool accurately calculates SWIFT score and can facilitate ICU discharge decisions without the need for manual data collection.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715140      PMCID: PMC3184347          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  9 in total

1.  The Reliability of Electronic Health Record Data Used for Obstetrical Research.

Authors:  Molly R Altman; Karen Colorafi; Kenn B Daratha
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Automatic quality improvement reports in the intensive care unit: One step closer toward meaningful use.

Authors:  Mikhail A Dziadzko; Charat Thongprayoon; Adil Ahmed; Ing C Tiong; Man Li; Daniel R Brown; Brian W Pickering; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

3.  Computerization of Mental Health Integration complexity scores at Intermountain Healthcare.

Authors:  Thomas A Oniki; Drayton Rodrigues; Noman Rahman; Saritha Patur; Pascal Briot; David P Taylor; Adam B Wilcox; Brenda Reiss-Brennan; Wayne H Cannon
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

4.  A Machine Learning Classifier Improves Mortality Prediction Compared With Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 Score: Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Remi D Prince; Alireza Akhondi-Asl; Nilesh M Mehta; Alon Geva
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  Readmissions and death after ICU discharge: development and validation of two predictive models.

Authors:  Omar Badawi; Michael J Breslow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The impact of changes in intensive care organization on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness-a narrative review.

Authors:  Alexander F van der Sluijs; Eline R van Slobbe-Bijlsma; Stephen E Chick; Margreeth B Vroom; Dave A Dongelmans; Alexander P J Vlaar
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2017-01-25

7.  Development and implementation of a risk identification tool to facilitate critical care transitions for high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hoffman; Jason Saucier; Serena Dasani; Tara Collins; Daniel N Holena; Meghan Fitzpatrick; Boris Tsypenyuk; Niels D Martin
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Comparison of Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Readmission Scores: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Regis Goulart Rosa; Cintia Roehrig; Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira; Juçara Gasparetto Maccari; Ana Carolina Peçanha Antônio; Priscylla de Souza Castro; Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer Neto; Patrícia de Campos Balzano; Cassiano Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validation of computerized automatic calculation of the sequential organ failure assessment score.

Authors:  Andrew M Harrison; Hemang Yadav; Brian W Pickering; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2013-07-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.