BACKGROUND:Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is a major target of the autoimmune response that occurs in type 1 diabetes mellitus. In animal models of autoimmunity, treatment with a target antigen can modulate aggressive autoimmunity. We aimed to assess whether immunisation with GAD formulated with aluminum hydroxide (GAD-alum) would preserve insulin production in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS:Patients aged 3-45 years who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for less than 100 days were enrolled from 15 sites in the USA and Canada, and randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments: three injections of 20 μg GAD-alum, two injections of 20 μg GAD-alum and one of alum, or 3 injections of alum. Injections were given subcutaneously at baseline, 4 weeks later, and 8 weeks after the second injection. The randomisation sequence was computer generated at the TrialNet coordinating centre. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted geometric mean area under the curve (AUC) of serum C-peptide during the first 2 h of a 4-h mixed meal tolerance test at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included changes in glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and insulin dose, and safety. Analysis included all randomised patients with known measurements. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00529399. FINDINGS:145 patients were enrolled and treated with GAD-alum (n=48), GAD-alum plus alum (n=49), or alum (n=48). At 1 year, the 2-h AUC of C-peptide, adjusted for age, sex, and baseline C-peptide value, was 0·412 nmol/L (95% CI 0·349-0·478) in the GAD-alum group, 0·382 nmol/L (0·322-0·446) in the GAD-alum plus alum group, and 0·413 nmol/L (0·351-0·477) in the alum group. The ratio of the population mean of the adjusted geometric mean 2-h AUC of C-peptide was 0·998 (95% CI 0·779-1·22; p=0·98) for GAD-alum versus alum, and 0·926 (0·720-1·13; p=0·50) for GAD-alum plus alum versus alum. HbA(1c), insulin use, and the occurrence and severity of adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Antigen-based immunotherapy therapy with two or three doses of subcutaneous GAD-alum across 4-12 weeks does not alter the course of loss of insulin secretion during 1 year in patients with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Although antigen-based therapy is a highly desirable treatment and is effective in animal models, translation to human autoimmune disease remains a challenge. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is a major target of the autoimmune response that occurs in type 1 diabetes mellitus. In animal models of autoimmunity, treatment with a target antigen can modulate aggressive autoimmunity. We aimed to assess whether immunisation with GAD formulated with aluminum hydroxide (GAD-alum) would preserve insulin production in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS:Patients aged 3-45 years who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for less than 100 days were enrolled from 15 sites in the USA and Canada, and randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments: three injections of 20 μg GAD-alum, two injections of 20 μg GAD-alum and one of alum, or 3 injections of alum. Injections were given subcutaneously at baseline, 4 weeks later, and 8 weeks after the second injection. The randomisation sequence was computer generated at the TrialNet coordinating centre. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted geometric mean area under the curve (AUC) of serum C-peptide during the first 2 h of a 4-h mixed meal tolerance test at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included changes in glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and insulin dose, and safety. Analysis included all randomised patients with known measurements. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00529399. FINDINGS: 145 patients were enrolled and treated with GAD-alum (n=48), GAD-alum plus alum (n=49), or alum (n=48). At 1 year, the 2-h AUC of C-peptide, adjusted for age, sex, and baseline C-peptide value, was 0·412 nmol/L (95% CI 0·349-0·478) in the GAD-alum group, 0·382 nmol/L (0·322-0·446) in the GAD-alum plus alum group, and 0·413 nmol/L (0·351-0·477) in the alum group. The ratio of the population mean of the adjusted geometric mean 2-h AUC of C-peptide was 0·998 (95% CI 0·779-1·22; p=0·98) for GAD-alum versus alum, and 0·926 (0·720-1·13; p=0·50) for GAD-alum plus alum versus alum. HbA(1c), insulin use, and the occurrence and severity of adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Antigen-based immunotherapy therapy with two or three doses of subcutaneous GAD-alum across 4-12 weeks does not alter the course of loss of insulin secretion during 1 year in patients with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Although antigen-based therapy is a highly desirable treatment and is effective in animal models, translation to humanautoimmune disease remains a challenge. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Kevan C Herold; William Hagopian; Julie A Auger; Ena Poumian-Ruiz; Lesley Taylor; David Donaldson; Stephen E Gitelman; David M Harlan; Danlin Xu; Robert A Zivin; Jeffrey A Bluestone Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-05-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Pozzilli; D Pitocco; N Visalli; M G Cavallo; R Buzzetti; A Crinò; S Spera; C Suraci; G Multari; M Cervoni; M L Manca Bitti; M C Matteoli; G Marietti; F Ferrazzoli; M R Cassone Faldetta; C Giordano; M Sbriglia; E Sarugeri; G Ghirlanda Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Tihamer Orban; Brian Bundy; Dorothy J Becker; Linda A DiMeglio; Stephen E Gitelman; Robin Goland; Peter A Gottlieb; Carla J Greenbaum; Jennifer B Marks; Roshanak Monzavi; Antoinette Moran; Philip Raskin; Henry Rodriguez; William E Russell; Desmond Schatz; Diane Wherrett; Darrell M Wilson; Jeffrey P Krischer; Jay S Skyler Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L Chaillous; H Lefèvre; C Thivolet; C Boitard; N Lahlou; C Atlan-Gepner; B Bouhanick; A Mogenet; M Nicolino; J C Carel; P Lecomte; R Maréchaud; P Bougnères; B Charbonnel; P Saï Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-08-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jerry P Palmer; G Alexander Fleming; Carla J Greenbaum; Kevan C Herold; Lisa D Jansa; Hubert Kolb; John M Lachin; Kenneth S Polonsky; Paolo Pozzilli; Jay S Skyler; Michael W Steffes Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Linda A DiMeglio; Peiyao Cheng; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Katrina J Ruedy; Robert Slover; Tandy Aye; Stuart A Weinzimer; Andrew A Bremer; Bruce Buckingham Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Polly J Bingley; Diane K Wherrett; Ann Shultz; Lisa E Rafkin; Mark A Atkinson; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 19.112