BACKGROUND: The immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with T-cell autoimmunity. To be fully active, immune T cells need a co-stimulatory signal in addition to the main antigen-driven signal. Abatacept modulates co-stimulation and prevents full T-cell activation. We evaluated the effect of abatacept in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 6-45 years recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive abatacept (10 mg/kg, maximum 1000 mg per dose) or placebo infusions intravenously on days 1, 14, 28, and monthly for a total of 27 infusions over 2 years. Computer-generated permuted block randomisation was used, with a block size of 3 and stratified by participating site. Neither patients nor research personnel were aware of treatment assignments. The primary outcome was baseline-adjusted geometric mean 2-h area-under-the-curve (AUC) serum C-peptide concentration after a mixed-meal tolerance test at 2 years' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat for all patients for whom data were available. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00505375. FINDINGS:112 patients were assigned to treatment groups (77 abatacept, 35 placebo). Adjusted C-peptide AUC was 59% (95% CI 6·1-112) higher at 2 years with abatacept (n=73, 0·378 nmol/L) than with placebo (n=30, 0·238 nmol/L; p=0·0029). The difference between groups was present throughout the trial, with an estimated 9·6 months' delay (95% CI 3·47-15·6) in C-peptide reduction with abatacept. There were few infusion-related adverse events (36 reactions occurred in 17 [22%] patients on abatacept and 11 reactions in six [17%] on placebo). There was no increase in infections (32 [42%] patients on abatacept vs 15 [43%] on placebo) or neutropenia (seven [9%] vs five [14%]). INTERPRETATION:Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept slowed reduction in β-cell function over 2 years. The beneficial effect suggests that T-cell activation still occurs around the time of clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Yet, despite continued administration of abatacept over 24 months, the decrease in β-cell function with abatacept was parallel to that with placebo after 6 months of treatment, causing us to speculate that T-cell activation lessens with time. Further observation will establish whether the beneficial effect continues after cessation of abatacept infusions. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with T-cell autoimmunity. To be fully active, immune T cells need a co-stimulatory signal in addition to the main antigen-driven signal. Abatacept modulates co-stimulation and prevents full T-cell activation. We evaluated the effect of abatacept in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 6-45 years recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive abatacept (10 mg/kg, maximum 1000 mg per dose) or placebo infusions intravenously on days 1, 14, 28, and monthly for a total of 27 infusions over 2 years. Computer-generated permuted block randomisation was used, with a block size of 3 and stratified by participating site. Neither patients nor research personnel were aware of treatment assignments. The primary outcome was baseline-adjusted geometric mean 2-h area-under-the-curve (AUC) serum C-peptide concentration after a mixed-meal tolerance test at 2 years' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat for all patients for whom data were available. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00505375. FINDINGS: 112 patients were assigned to treatment groups (77 abatacept, 35 placebo). Adjusted C-peptide AUC was 59% (95% CI 6·1-112) higher at 2 years with abatacept (n=73, 0·378 nmol/L) than with placebo (n=30, 0·238 nmol/L; p=0·0029). The difference between groups was present throughout the trial, with an estimated 9·6 months' delay (95% CI 3·47-15·6) in C-peptide reduction with abatacept. There were few infusion-related adverse events (36 reactions occurred in 17 [22%] patients on abatacept and 11 reactions in six [17%] on placebo). There was no increase in infections (32 [42%] patients on abatacept vs 15 [43%] on placebo) or neutropenia (seven [9%] vs five [14%]). INTERPRETATION: Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept slowed reduction in β-cell function over 2 years. The beneficial effect suggests that T-cell activation still occurs around the time of clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Yet, despite continued administration of abatacept over 24 months, the decrease in β-cell function with abatacept was parallel to that with placebo after 6 months of treatment, causing us to speculate that T-cell activation lessens with time. Further observation will establish whether the beneficial effect continues after cessation of abatacept infusions. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Philip Mease; Mark C Genovese; Geoffrey Gladstein; Alan J Kivitz; Christopher Ritchlin; Paul P Tak; Jürgen Wollenhaupt; Orna Bahary; Jean-Claude Becker; Sheila Kelly; Leonard Sigal; Julie Teng; Dafna Gladman Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-04
Authors: Mark D Pescovitz; Carla J Greenbaum; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Dorothy J Becker; Stephen E Gitelman; Robin Goland; Peter A Gottlieb; Jennifer B Marks; Paula F McGee; Antoinette M Moran; Philip Raskin; Henry Rodriguez; Desmond A Schatz; Diane Wherrett; Darrell M Wilson; John M Lachin; Jay S Skyler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Johnny Ludvigsson; Maria Faresjö; Maria Hjorth; Stina Axelsson; Mikael Chéramy; Mikael Pihl; Outi Vaarala; Gun Forsander; Sten Ivarsson; Calle Johansson; Agne Lindh; Nils-Osten Nilsson; Jan Aman; Eva Ortqvist; Peter Zerhouni; Rosaura Casas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jerry P Palmer; G Alexander Fleming; Carla J Greenbaum; Kevan C Herold; Lisa D Jansa; Hubert Kolb; John M Lachin; Kenneth S Polonsky; Paolo Pozzilli; Jay S Skyler; Michael W Steffes Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: B Keymeulen; M Walter; C Mathieu; L Kaufman; F Gorus; R Hilbrands; E Vandemeulebroucke; U Van de Velde; L Crenier; C De Block; S Candon; H Waldmann; A G Ziegler; L Chatenoud; D Pipeleers Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Carla J Greenbaum; Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen; Paula Friedenberg McGee; Tadej Battelino; Burkhard Haastert; Johnny Ludvigsson; Paolo Pozzilli; John M Lachin; Hubert Kolb Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Scott J Pilla; Amy Q Quan; Emily L Germain-Lee; David B Hellmann; Nestoras N Mathioudakis Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.810