BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Metrics derived from conventional MRI are now routinely used to detect therapeutic effects and extend clinical observations. Conventional MRI measures have insufficient sensitivity and specificity to reveal the true degree of pathologic changes occurring in MS. T2-weighted and T1-weighted imaging cannot distinguish between inflammation, edema, demyelination, Wallerian degeneration, and axonal loss. Nonconventional MRI techniques are now emerging and proving to be more related with the most disabling features of MS. REVIEW SUMMARY: The large variety of MRI metrics presently available are summarized, including measurement of T1-weighted hypointense lesions, central nervous system atrophy, magnetization transfer imaging, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and susceptibility-weighted imaging. The most up-to-date MRI techniques and their relationship with central nervous system pathology are described, and a comprehensive overview of the use of MRI in patients with MS is offered. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced MRI techniques provide a better understanding of the pathologic processes that most likely are related to disease activity and clinical progression. Such metrics are able to reveal a range of tissue changes that include demyelination, axonal loss, iron deposition, and neurodegeneration and they provide the evidence that important occult pathology is occurring in the normal appearing white and gray matter. Despite these promising results none of these techniques have been adopted in the MRI consensus guidelines for imaging of the brain and spinal cord in patients with MS due to lack of standardization.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Metrics derived from conventional MRI are now routinely used to detect therapeutic effects and extend clinical observations. Conventional MRI measures have insufficient sensitivity and specificity to reveal the true degree of pathologic changes occurring in MS. T2-weighted and T1-weighted imaging cannot distinguish between inflammation, edema, demyelination, Wallerian degeneration, and axonal loss. Nonconventional MRI techniques are now emerging and proving to be more related with the most disabling features of MS. REVIEW SUMMARY: The large variety of MRI metrics presently available are summarized, including measurement of T1-weighted hypointense lesions, central nervous system atrophy, magnetization transfer imaging, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and susceptibility-weighted imaging. The most up-to-date MRI techniques and their relationship with central nervous system pathology are described, and a comprehensive overview of the use of MRI in patients with MS is offered. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced MRI techniques provide a better understanding of the pathologic processes that most likely are related to disease activity and clinical progression. Such metrics are able to reveal a range of tissue changes that include demyelination, axonal loss, iron deposition, and neurodegeneration and they provide the evidence that important occult pathology is occurring in the normal appearing white and gray matter. Despite these promising results none of these techniques have been adopted in the MRI consensus guidelines for imaging of the brain and spinal cord in patients with MS due to lack of standardization.
Authors: Francesca Bagnato; Simon Hametner; David Pennell; Richard Dortch; Adrienne N Dula; Siddharama Pawate; Seth A Smith; Hans Lassmann; John C Gore; Edward B Welch Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Alireza Minagar; Michael H Barnett; Ralph H B Benedict; Daniel Pelletier; Istvan Pirko; Mohamad Ali Sahraian; Elliott Frohman; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ivan I Kirov; Shu Liu; Assaf Tal; William E Wu; Matthew S Davitz; James S Babb; Henry Rusinek; Joseph Herbert; Oded Gonen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Rachel Aliotta; Jennifer L Cox; Katelyn Donohue; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; E Ann Yeh; Paul Polak; Michael G Dwyer; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Dejan Jakimovski; Murali Ramanathan; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Niels Bergsland; Deepa P Ramasamay; Ellen Carl; Michael G Dwyer; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: In-Young Choi; Phil Lee; Peter Adany; Abbey J Hughes; Scott Belliston; Douglas R Denney; Sharon G Lynch Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Thanh D Nguyen; Kofi Deh; Elizabeth Monohan; Sneha Pandya; Pascal Spincemaille; Ashish Raj; Yi Wang; Susan A Gauthier Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J Hagemeier; M Heininen-Brown; T Gabelic; T Guttuso; N Silvestri; D Lichter; L E Fugoso; N Bergsland; E Carl; J J G Geurts; B Weinstock-Guttman; R Zivadinov Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 3.825