Literature DB >> 21711705

Promotion of allergic immune responses by intranasally-administrated nanosilica particles in mice.

Tokuyuki Yoshida1, Yasuo Yoshioka, Maho Fujimura, Kohei Yamashita, Kazuma Higashisaka, Yuki Morishita, Hiroyuki Kayamuro, Hiromi Nabeshi, Kazuya Nagano, Yasuhiro Abe, Haruhiko Kamada, Shin-Ichi Tsunoda, Norio Itoh, Tomoaki Yoshikawa, Yasuo Tsutsumi.   

Abstract

With the increase in use of nanomaterials, there is growing concern regarding their potential health risks. However, few studies have assessed the role of the different physical characteristics of nanomaterials in allergic responses. Here, we examined whether intranasally administered silica particles of various sizes have the capacity to promote allergic immune responses in mice. We used nanosilica particles with diameters of 30 or 70 nm (nSP30 or nSP70, respectively), and conventional micro-sized silica particles with diameters of 300 or 1000 nm (nSP300 or mSP1000, respectively). Mice were intranasally exposed to ovalbumin (OVA) plus each silica particle, and the levels of OVA-specific antibodies (Abs) in the plasma were determined. Intranasal exposure to OVA plus smaller nanosilica particles tended to induce a higher level of OVA-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E, IgG and IgG1 Abs than did exposure to OVA plus larger silica particles. Splenocytes from mice exposed to OVA plus nSP30 secreted higher levels of Th2-type cytokines than mice exposed to OVA alone. Taken together, these results indicate that nanosilica particles can induce allergen-specific Th2-type allergic immune responses in vivo. This study provides the foundations for the establishment of safe and effective forms of nanosilica particles.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21711705      PMCID: PMC3211251          DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett        ISSN: 1556-276X            Impact factor:   4.703


Introduction

With the recent development of nanotechnology, many nanomaterials with innovative functions have been developed. For example, nanoparticles of titanium dioxide and silica have been used in commercial applications related to medicine, cosmetics and food [1]. In particular, amorphous (noncrystalline) nanosilica particles possess extraordinary advantages, including straightforward synthesis, relatively low cost, and easy surface modification [1,2]. Nanosilica particles are increasingly being used for many applications, including cosmetics, food technology, medical diagnosis, cancer therapy, and drug delivery [1-4]. As the use of nanomaterials increases, there is rising concern regarding their potential health risks because there is preliminary evidence that the unique electrical and mechanical properties of nanomaterials is associated with undesirable biological interactions [5,6]. In addition, it has recently become evident that particle characteristics, including particle size and surface properties, are important factors in pathologic alterations and cellular responses [7-10]. For instance, Nishimori et al have previously demonstrated that nanosilica particles with relatively small particle size induce a greater level of toxicity, including liver injury, than do silica particles with larger particle size [11]. To create safe and effective forms of nanomaterials, studies which provide basic information regarding biological responses to nanomaterials are essential. Numerous studies have shown that several types of nanomaterials increase the incidence of allergic immune diseases [12-14]. Activation of the Th2 response, including production of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 from Th2 cells (a subset of CD4+ T cells) and immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 or IgE from B cells, is responsible for many of the pathologic features of allergic immune diseases [15]. Some reports have shown that intranasal or airway exposure to nanomaterials promotes allergic immune responses, indicating the immune-activating potential of nanomaterials [12,13]. However, the role of the different physical characteristics of nanomaterials in the production of allergic responses has not been elucidated. Here, we examined whether intranasal exposure to nanosilica particles has the capacity to promote allergic immune responses in mice. In addition, we investigated the relationship between the size of silica particles and allergic immune responses.

Materials and methods

Silica particles

Amorphous silica particles with a diameter of 30, 70, 300 and 1,000 nm (Micromod Partikeltechnologie, Rostock/Warnemünde, Germany, designated nSP30, nSP70, nSP300 and mSP1000, respectively) were used in this study. The particle numbers of silica particles were 3.5 × 1013, 2.8 × 1012, 3.5 × 1010, or 9.5 × 108 particles/mg (nSP30, nSP70, nSP300, or mSP1000, respectively). Silica particles were sonicated for 5 min and vortexed for 1 min before use. The size of particles was measured using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments, UK). The mean size and the size distribution of particles were measured by means of dynamic light scattering. We confirmed that the particle size distributions of these silica particles were narrow.

Mice

Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Nippon SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan) and used at 6 to 8 weeks of age. All of the animal experimental procedures in this study were performed in accordance with the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals. Exposure protocols and detection of antigen-specific antibody responses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Female BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to a 20 μL aliquot (10 μL per nostril) containing 10 μg of ovalbumin (OVA; Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO, USA) as antigen, plus nSP30, nSP70, nSP300, or mSP1000 at concentrations of 10, 50 or 250 μg/mouse, on days 0, 1, and 2. On day 21, plasma was collected to assess antigen-specific antibody (Ab) responses. Antigen-specific IgG and subclass IgG1 Ab levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The ELISA plates (Maxisorp, type 96F; Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL, USA) were coated with 10 μg/ml OVA and incubated overnight at 4°C. Non-specific Ab binding was minimized by incubating the plates with 4% blocking solution (Block Ace; Dainippon Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan) at 37°C for 2 h. Plasma dilutions were added to the antigen-coated plates and incubated at 37°C for a further 2 h. The coated plates were then washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG solution (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL, USA) at 37°C for 2 h. The color reaction was developed with tetramethylbenzidine (MOSS, Inc., Pasadena, MD, USA), stopped with 2N H2SO4, and quantitated by measuring OD450 minus OD655 using a microplate reader. OVA-specific IgE Ab levels in plasma were determined using commercial ELISA kits (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Osaka, Japan).

Isolation of splenocytes

Spleens were aseptically removed and placed in RPMI 1640 medium (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 1% antibiotic cocktail (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The single-cell suspension of splenocytes was treated with ammonium chloride to lyse the red blood cells, and the splenocytes were washed, counted, and suspended in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% antibiotic cocktail, 10 mL/L of 100 × nonessential amino acids solution, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 10 mM HEPES to a final concentration of 1 × 107 cells/mL.

Antigen-specific cytokine responses

Antigen-specific cytokine responses were evaluated by culturing the splenocytes (5 × 106 cells/well) in the presence of OVA (1 mg/mL) in vitro. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Culture supernatants from in vitro unstimulated and OVA-stimulated cells were analyzed by the Bio-Plex Multiplex Cytokine Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The assay results were read on a Luminex 100 Multiplex Bio-Assay Analyzer (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA). The difference between the mean concentration of cytokines in supernatants from in vitro OVA-stimulated cells and unstimulated cells (background) was then calculated.

Statistical Analysis

All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were assessed using analysis of variance followed by Turkey's method.

Results and discussion

Antigen-specific IgE Ab responses to silica particles

To assess the relationship between the size of silica particles and allergic immune responses, we used nanosilica particles with diameters of 30 or 70 nm (nSP30 or nSP70, respectively), and conventional micro-sized silica particles with diameters of 300 or 1,000 nm (nSP300 or mSP1000, respectively). The mean secondary particle diameters of the silica particles measured by dynamic laser scatter analysis were 33, 79, 326, and 945 nm, respectively (data not shown). We examined the silica particles by transmission electron microscopy, and confirmed that they were well-dispersed smooth-surfaced spheres (data not shown). To investigate the potential of silica particles to enhance allergic immune responses, we examined their effect on the production of allergen-specific Abs responses in vivo. On days 0, 1, and 2, mice were intranasally exposed to OVA (10 μg/mouse) plus silica particles at concentrations of 10, 50, and 250 μg/mouse. On day 21, we collected plasma from the mice and performed an ELISA to examine anti-OVA IgE Ab responses. The levels of IgE Abs tended to be higher in mice exposed to OVA plus smaller nanosilica particles than in mice exposed to OVA plus larger silica particles (Figure 1a). In particular, the OVA-specific IgE Ab level in OVA plus nSP30-exposed mice was significantly higher than in mice exposed to OVA alone (Figure 1a). We consider that this level of IgE Ab would induce the mast cell degranulation and histamine release, which are major mechanisms underlying anaphylactic reactions in allergic diseases [16]. In addition, the OVA-specific IgE Ab response in mice exposed to OVA plus nSP30 increased in an nSP30-dose-dependent manner (Figure 1b). Taken together, these results suggest that nanosilica particles such as nSP30 are capable of inducing allergic immune responses and have the potential to cause serious allergic symptoms.
Figure 1

Plasma OVA-specific IgE Ab responses after intranasal exposure to OVA plus silica particles. (a) BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus silica particles (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, and 2. (b) BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus the designated dose of nSP30 or nSP70 on days 0, 1, and 2. Plasma was collected on day 21 and analyzed by ELISA to assess (a) the relationship between silica particle size and OVA-specific IgE Ab responses and (b) the dose-response effect of nSP30 and nSP70 on OVA-specific IgE Ab levels. N.D., not detected. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 8 to 13; *P < 0.05 vs OVA alone).

Plasma OVA-specific IgE Ab responses after intranasal exposure to OVA plus silica particles. (a) BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus silica particles (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, and 2. (b) BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus the designated dose of nSP30 or nSP70 on days 0, 1, and 2. Plasma was collected on day 21 and analyzed by ELISA to assess (a) the relationship between silica particle size and OVA-specific IgE Ab responses and (b) the dose-response effect of nSP30 and nSP70 on OVA-specific IgE Ab levels. N.D., not detected. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 8 to 13; *P < 0.05 vs OVA alone).

Antigen-specific IgG Abs subclass responses of silica particles

Next, to assess the types of immune responses elicited by silica particles, we measured the levels of anti-OVA IgG Ab and anti-OVA IgG1 Ab. IgG1 production is indicative of a Th2-type response. The levels of anti-OVA IgG and anti-OVA IgG1 Abs induced by intranasal-exposure to OVA plus smaller silica particles were higher than those induced by OVA plus larger silica particles (Figure 2); this was similar to the results observed for IgE Ab responses, described above (Figure 1). The levels of OVA-specific IgG Ab and OVA-specific IgG1 Ab in mice exposed to OVA plus nSP30 were significantly higher than in those exposed to OVA alone (Figure 2). These results suggest that nanosilica particles can induce the production of antigen-specific Ab responses including antigen-specific Th2 allergic immune responses.
Figure 2

Plasma OVA-specific IgG and subclass IgG1 Ab response after intranasal exposure to OVA plus silica particles. BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus silica particles (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, and 2. Plasma was collected on day 21 and analyzed by ELISA to detect the level of (a) OVA-specific IgG and (b) OVA-specific IgG1 Ab responses. Data represent mean absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm (reference wavelength, 655 nm). N.D., not detected. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5 to 8); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs OVA alone; P < 0.01 vs PBS).

Plasma OVA-specific IgG and subclass IgG1 Ab response after intranasal exposure to OVA plus silica particles. BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus silica particles (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, and 2. Plasma was collected on day 21 and analyzed by ELISA to detect the level of (a) OVA-specific IgG and (b) OVA-specific IgG1 Ab responses. Data represent mean absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm (reference wavelength, 655 nm). N.D., not detected. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5 to 8); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs OVA alone; P < 0.01 vs PBS).

Antigen-specific cytokine responses of silica particles

To clarify the mechanism by which nSP30 elicited an immune response, we analyzed the profiles of cytokines released from splenocytes of OVA-exposed mice. The splenocytes were cultured in the presence of OVA in vitro, and the culture supernatants were assessed for Th2-type cytokines by using a multiplexed immunobeads assay. Splenocytes from mice exposed to OVA plus nSP30 exhibited higher levels of Th2-type cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5) than those induced with OVA alone (Figure 3). In contrast, there was hardly any difference in Th1-type cytokine (IFN-γ) production amongst all of the exposed mice (data not shown). In addition, nSP70, nSP300, and mSP1000 did not induce cytokine production (Figure 3). These results suggest that nSP30 nanosilica particle induces a Th2-type immune response in this experiment.
Figure 3

Cytokine responses induced after intranasal exposure to OVA plus silica particles. BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus silica particles (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, and 2. On day 21, splenocytes from each group were prepared and cultured with 1 mg/mL OVA. Culture supernatants were harvested after 3 days of incubation, and the level of OVA-induced IL-4 (A) and IL-5 (B) produced and released into the culture supernatant was analyzed using the Bio-Plex Multiplex Cytokine Assay. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3; *P < 0.05 vs OVA alone; P < 0.05 vs PBS).

Cytokine responses induced after intranasal exposure to OVA plus silica particles. BALB/c mice were intranasally exposed to PBS (vehicle control), OVA alone or OVA plus silica particles (250 μg/mouse) on days 0, 1, and 2. On day 21, splenocytes from each group were prepared and cultured with 1 mg/mL OVA. Culture supernatants were harvested after 3 days of incubation, and the level of OVA-induced IL-4 (A) and IL-5 (B) produced and released into the culture supernatant was analyzed using the Bio-Plex Multiplex Cytokine Assay. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3; *P < 0.05 vs OVA alone; P < 0.05 vs PBS). It is not clear why nanosilica particles such as nSP30 would induce Th2-polarized allergic immunity. Our results support previous reports showing that the immune-activating effect of nanomaterials increases with decreasing particle size [12,17]. The mechanisms behind the immune-activating effect of nanomaterials have not been fully elucidated. Nygaard et al [17] showed that the higher specific surface area of nanomaterials as compared to micro-sized particles allows more antigen to be adsorbed per particle. We consider that one possible mechanism by which allergic immune responses induced by nanosilica particles is that many antigen-captured nanomaterials might be taken up by professional antigen presenting cells, such as dendritic cells. Another possible mechanism is that the nanomaterials induce oxidative stress [18,19]. We have observed that nanosilica particles such as nSP30 are stronger inducers of oxidative stress than larger silica particles (unpublished data). Because there is accumulating evidence that oxidative stress plays a role in pro-inflammatory and immune-activating effects [20,21], dendritic cells might be activated more efficiently by nSP30 than by larger silica particles. Furthermore, we also observed that induction of oxidative stress by nanosilica particles is decreased by surface modification of nanosilica particles (unpublished data). Therefore, surface modification might be one approach to decrease allergic immune responses induced by nanosilica particles.

Conclusion

Here, we show that nanosilica particles have the potential to induce allergic immune responses after intranasal exposure. We consider that further studies of the relationship between the characteristics of nanomaterials and allergic immune responses will facilitate the development of safe and effective nanomaterials.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

TY and YY designed the study; TY, MF, KY, KH, YM and HK performed experiments; TY, YY and MF collected and analysed data; TY and YY wrote the manuscript; HN, KN, YA, HK, ST, NI and TY gave technical support and conceptual advice. YT supervised the all of projects. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
  21 in total

1.  The capacity of particles to increase allergic sensitization is predicted by particle number and surface area, not by particle mass.

Authors:  Unni Cecilie Nygaard; Mari Samuelsen; Audun Aase; Martinus Løvik
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel.

Authors:  Andre Nel; Tian Xia; Lutz Mädler; Ning Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Nanomedicine and nanotoxicology: two sides of the same coin.

Authors:  Valerian E Kagan; Hülya Bayir; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 4.  Importance of cytokines in murine allergic airway disease and human asthma.

Authors:  Fred D Finkelman; Simon P Hogan; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey; Marc E Rothenberg; Marsha Wills-Karp
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines.

Authors:  D M Brown; M R Wilson; W MacNee; V Stone; K Donaldson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  The effect of surface modification of amorphous silica particles on NLRP3 inflammasome mediated IL-1beta production, ROS production and endosomal rupture.

Authors:  Tomohiro Morishige; Yasuo Yoshioka; Hiroshi Inakura; Aya Tanabe; Xinglei Yao; Shogo Narimatsu; Youko Monobe; Takayoshi Imazawa; Shin-ichi Tsunoda; Yasuo Tsutsumi; Yohei Mukai; Naoki Okada; Shinsaku Nakagawa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Ultrafine but not fine particulate matter causes airway inflammation and allergic airway sensitization to co-administered antigen in mice.

Authors:  C de Haar; I Hassing; M Bol; R Bleumink; R Pieters
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.018

Review 8.  The role of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in mast cell-dependent inflammatory processes.

Authors:  Emily J Swindle; Dean D Metcalfe
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 9.  Nanosilica-from medicine to pest control.

Authors:  T K Barik; B Sahu; V Swain
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Quantum dot-doped silica nanoparticles as probes for targeting of T-lymphocytes.

Authors:  Massimo Bottini; Federica D'Annibale; Andrea Magrini; Fabio Cerignoli; Yutaka Arimura; Marcia I Dawson; Enrico Bergamaschi; Nicola Rosato; Antonio Bergamaschi; Tomas Mustelin
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
View more
  14 in total

1.  Surface area- and mass-based comparison of fine and ultrafine nickel oxide lung toxicity and augmentation of allergic response in an ovalbumin asthma model.

Authors:  Katherine A Roach; Stacey E Anderson; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Hillary L Shane; Vamsi Kodali; Michael Kashon; Jenny R Roberts
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Striking Differences in Platelet Distribution between Advanced-Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Concentrated Growth Factors: Effects of Silica-Containing Plastic Tubes.

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Tsujino; Hideo Masuki; Masayuki Nakamura; Kazushige Isobe; Hideo Kawabata; Hachidai Aizawa; Taisuke Watanabe; Yutaka Kitamura; Hajime Okudera; Kazuhiro Okuda; Koh Nakata; Tomoyuki Kawase
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-09-17

Review 3.  Metal nanomaterials: Immune effects and implications of physicochemical properties on sensitization, elicitation, and exacerbation of allergic disease.

Authors:  Katherine A Roach; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Jenny R Roberts
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  The Toxicology of Engineered Nanomaterials in Asthma.

Authors:  Mark D Ihrie; James C Bonner
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-03

5.  Intranasal exposure to amorphous nanosilica particles could activate intrinsic coagulation cascade and platelets in mice.

Authors:  Tokuyuki Yoshida; Yasuo Yoshioka; Saeko Tochigi; Toshiro Hirai; Miyuki Uji; Ko-ichi Ichihashi; Kazuya Nagano; Yasuhiro Abe; Haruhiko Kamada; Shin-Ichi Tsunoda; Hiromi Nabeshi; Kazuma Higashisaka; Tomoaki Yoshikawa; Yasuo Tsutsumi
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  AHAPS-functionalized silica nanoparticles do not modulate allergic contact dermatitis in mice.

Authors:  Anja Ostrowski; Daniel Nordmeyer; Lars Mundhenk; Joachim W Fluhr; Jürgen Lademann; Christina Graf; Eckart Rühl; Achim D Gruber
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 7.  Nanotechnology: An Untapped Resource for Food Packaging.

Authors:  Chetan Sharma; Romika Dhiman; Namita Rokana; Harsh Panwar
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Mechanistic insight into the impact of nanomaterials on asthma and allergic airway disease.

Authors:  Kirsty Meldrum; Chang Guo; Emma L Marczylo; Timothy W Gant; Rachel Smith; Martin O Leonard
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 9.  Mechanisms of Particles in Sensitization, Effector Function and Therapy of Allergic Disease.

Authors:  Isabella Anna Joubert; Mark Geppert; Litty Johnson; Robert Mills-Goodlet; Sara Michelini; Evgeniia Korotchenko; Albert Duschl; Richard Weiss; Jutta Horejs-Höck; Martin Himly
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Intestinal absorption and biological effects of orally administered amorphous silica particles.

Authors:  Tokuyuki Yoshida; Yasuo Yoshioka; Hideki Takahashi; Kazuki Misato; Takahide Mori; Toshiro Hirai; Kazuya Nagano; Yasuhiro Abe; Yohei Mukai; Haruhiko Kamada; Shin-Ichi Tsunoda; Hiromi Nabeshi; Tomoaki Yoshikawa; Kazuma Higashisaka; Yasuo Tsutsumi
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.