Literature DB >> 21709691

The impact of PSA testing frequency on prostate cancer incidence and treatment in older men.

Y-H Shao1, P C Albertsen, W Shih, C B Roberts, G L Lu-Yao.   

Abstract

To quantify the downstream impact of PSA testing on cancer characteristics and utilization of cancer therapies among men aged 70 or older, we utilized patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2004-2005 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare and their Medicare claims before their cancer diagnosis during 2000-2005. Among men in the highest testing group (4-6 PSA tests), 75% were diagnosed with low- or intermediate-risk of disease, but 77% received treatments within 180 days of cancer diagnosis. More than 45% of newly diagnosed patients in 2004-2005 had 4-6 PSA tests before their cancer diagnosis during 2000-2005. Men in the high testing group were 3.57 times more likely to receive cancer treatments (either surgery, radiation or hormonal therapy) when compared with men who had no previous PSA testing during the same time period. Among men aged 75+ diagnosed with low-risk cancer, men in the high testing group were 78% more likely to receive treatment than those who had no previous PSA testing. In conclusion, given the lack of evidence of effective treatment for elderly patients diagnosed with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer and our inability to distinguish indolent from aggressive cancer, more frequent PSA testing among elderly population may exacerbate the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709691      PMCID: PMC3649843          DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2011.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  29 in total

1.  A piece of my mind. Winners and losers.

Authors:  Daniel Merenstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection.

Authors:  Mark H Kawachi; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Barry; J Erik Busby; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; William J Catalona; Michael S Cookson; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Veda N Giri; George P Hemstreet; Richard J Howe; Paul H Lange; Hans Lilja; Kevin R Loughlin; James Mohler; Judd Moul; Robert B Nadler; Stephen G Patterson; Joseph C Presti; Antoinette M Stroup; Robert Wake; John T Wei
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Comparative efficiency of prostate-specific antigen screening strategies for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  K S Ross; H B Carter; J D Pearson; H A Guess
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Daniel Bertenthal; Karla Lindquist; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Anna Grenabo; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prostate specific antigen testing among the elderly--when to stop?

Authors:  Edward M Schaeffer; H Ballentine Carter; Anna Kettermann; Stacy Loeb; Luigi Ferrucci; Patricia Landis; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Primary care physicians' reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Suzanne K Linder; Sarah T Hawley; Crystale P Cooper; Lawrence E Scholl; Maria Jibaja-Weiss; Robert J Volk
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Marc A Bjurlin; Joseph Nicholson; Teuvo L Tammela; David F Penson; H Ballentine Carter; Peter Carroll; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Bradley N Reames; Peter McCulloch; Andrew J Carr; W Bruce Campbell; John E Wennberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  [Intelligent early prostate cancer detection in 2021: more benefit than harm].

Authors:  N Westhoff; J von Hardenberg; M-S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Prognostic potential of ERG (ETS-related gene) expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A Marcell Szász; Attila Majoros; Philip Rosen; Shiv Srivastava; Albert Dobi; Attila Szendrői; Janina Kulka; Péter Nyirády
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Cancer-specific survival after metastasis following primary radical prostatectomy compared with radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients: results of a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Joni Shao; Sung Kim; Dirk F Moore; Weichung Shih; Yong Lin; Mark Stein; Isaac Yi Kim; Grace L Lu-Yao
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Is the risk of motor neuron disease increased or decreased after cancer? An Australian case-control study.

Authors:  Alex Stoyanov; Roger Pamphlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of assessing genetic risk of prostate cancer on the use of PSA tests in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacob Fredsøe; Jan Koetsenruyter; Peter Vedsted; Pia Kirkegaard; Michael Væth; Adrian Edwards; Torben F Ørntoft; Karina D Sørensen; Flemming Bro
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Downstream tests, treatments, and annual direct payments in older men cared for by primary care providers with high or low prostate-specific antigen screening rates using 100 percent Texas U.S. Medicare public insurance claims data: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Preeti Zanwar; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.