Literature DB >> 10989402

Comparative efficiency of prostate-specific antigen screening strategies for prostate cancer detection.

K S Ross1, H B Carter, J D Pearson, H A Guess.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite widespread use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to detect prostate cancer, the relative effectiveness of different PSA screening strategies is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To compare prostate cancer mortality, PSA testing rates, and biopsy rates using various PSA screening strategies, including the standard strategy of annually testing men aged 50 through 75 years. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A Monte-Carlo simulation based on a Markov model was used to simulate the natural history of prostate cancer using different starting ages, testing intervals, and PSA thresholds for prostate biopsy. Age-specific PSA levels and prostate biopsy detection probabilities were determined from population data and surgical series. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of prevented prostate cancer deaths, PSA tests, and prostate biopsies per 1000 men aged 40 through 80 years, compared among 7 different strategies vs no screening.
RESULTS: Compared with annual PSA testing beginning at age 50 years, the strategy of PSA testing at ages 40 and 45 years followed by biennial testing beginning at age 50 years was estimated to simultaneously reduce prostate cancer mortality and number of PSA tests and biopsies performed per 1000 men. Specifically, compared with no screening, the standard strategy prevents 3.2 deaths, with an additional 10,500 PSA tests and 600 prostate biopsies, while the earlier but less frequent strategy prevents 3.3 deaths, with an additional 7500 PSA tests and 450 prostate biopsies. Strategies that lowered the PSA threshold for prostate biopsy to below 4.0 ng/mL or strategies that used age-specific PSA levels were not more efficient than use of a PSA threshold of 4.0 ng/mL. These 2 findings remained true under all sensitivity analyses performed to test assumptions of the model.
CONCLUSION: Recognizing that the efficacy of PSA screening is unproved, the standard strategy of annual PSA screening beginning at age 50 years appears to be less effective and more resource intensive compared with a strategy that begins earlier but screens biennially instead of annually. JAMA. 2000;284:1399-1405.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10989402     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.11.1399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  26 in total

1.  Optimization of PSA screening policies: a comparison of the patient and societal perspectives.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhang; Brian T Denton; Hari Balasubramanian; Nilay D Shah; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Priorities in future research in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Simulation optimization of PSA-threshold based prostate cancer screening policies.

Authors:  Daniel J Underwood; Jingyu Zhang; Brian T Denton; Nilay D Shah; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-12

4.  Best of the 2002 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association May 25-30, 2002, Orlando, FL.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

5.  Optimal healthcare decision making under multiple mathematical models: application in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Dimitris Bertsimas; John Silberholz; Thomas Trikalinos
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2016-09-17

Review 6.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Luigi Ferrucci; Anna Kettermann; Patricia Landis; E James Wright; Jonathan I Epstein; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Benny Holmström; Mattias Johansson; Anders Bergh; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Göran Hallmans; Pär Stattin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.