BACKGROUND: Enumeration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes is important in the management of HIV. However, standard laboratory systems based on flow cytometry are expensive, complicated, and thus unavailable to most resource-limited settings where a low-cost and fully automated point-of-care CD4 testing system is required. In attempts to address this issue, a study was conducted to validate the Alere PIMA point-of-care CD4 test. METHOD: Duplicate values of the absolute number of CD4+ T-lymphocytes in 203 HIV-infected blood samples obtained using the PIMA system were compared with the two predicate single-platform FACSCount and the dual-platform FACSCan (Becton Dickinson Biosciences). RESULTS: The overall absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count obtained using the PIMA system correlated highly with the FACSCount (r = 0.957; mean bias, -54.2 cells/μL; limit of agreement, -190.9 to +82.5 cells/μL) and the FACSCan (r = 0.957; mean bias -44.0 cells/μL; limit of agreement, -179.7 to +91.6 cells/μL). Good correlation and low biases were also observed for samples with CD4+ T-lymphocyte count ranges of 0 to 200 and 0 to 350 cells/μL. Additionally, there was no significant difference in absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts noted between the duplicate samples using the PIMA system. CONCLUSIONS: This new point-of-care product is a simple and reliable system and should contribute significantly to the simplification of performing CD4 testing and thus increase access for patients in resource-limited settings. The inability to obtain values for the frequency (%) of CD4+ T-lymphocyte count is one limitation of the PIMA system, the addition of which would be of value for clinical staging or monitoring in HIV-infected pediatric patients.
BACKGROUND: Enumeration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes is important in the management of HIV. However, standard laboratory systems based on flow cytometry are expensive, complicated, and thus unavailable to most resource-limited settings where a low-cost and fully automated point-of-care CD4 testing system is required. In attempts to address this issue, a study was conducted to validate the Alere PIMA point-of-care CD4 test. METHOD: Duplicate values of the absolute number of CD4+ T-lymphocytes in 203 HIV-infected blood samples obtained using the PIMA system were compared with the two predicate single-platform FACSCount and the dual-platform FACSCan (Becton Dickinson Biosciences). RESULTS: The overall absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count obtained using the PIMA system correlated highly with the FACSCount (r = 0.957; mean bias, -54.2 cells/μL; limit of agreement, -190.9 to +82.5 cells/μL) and the FACSCan (r = 0.957; mean bias -44.0 cells/μL; limit of agreement, -179.7 to +91.6 cells/μL). Good correlation and low biases were also observed for samples with CD4+ T-lymphocyte count ranges of 0 to 200 and 0 to 350 cells/μL. Additionally, there was no significant difference in absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts noted between the duplicate samples using the PIMA system. CONCLUSIONS: This new point-of-care product is a simple and reliable system and should contribute significantly to the simplification of performing CD4 testing and thus increase access for patients in resource-limited settings. The inability to obtain values for the frequency (%) of CD4+ T-lymphocyte count is one limitation of the PIMA system, the addition of which would be of value for clinical staging or monitoring in HIV-infected pediatricpatients.
Authors: Kara M Palamountain; Jeff Baker; Elliot P Cowan; Shaffiq Essajee; Laura T Mazzola; Mutsumi Metzler; Marco Schito; Wendy S Stevens; Gloria J Young; Gonzalo J Domingo Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Paul K Drain; Emily P Hyle; Farzad Noubary; Kenneth A Freedberg; Douglas Wilson; William R Bishai; William Rodriguez; Ingrid V Bassett Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Bruce A Larson; Kathryn Schnippel; Buyiswa Ndibongo; Thembisile Xulu; Alana Brennan; Lawrence Long; Matthew P Fox; Sydney Rosen Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Bharat S Parekh; Chin-Yih Ou; Peter N Fonjungo; Mireille B Kalou; Erin Rottinghaus; Adrian Puren; Heather Alexander; Mackenzie Hurlston Cox; John N Nkengasong Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Haneefa T Saleem; Dorothy Mushi; Saria Hassan; R Douglas Bruce; Alexis Cooke; Jessie Mbwambo; Barrot H Lambdin Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2015-12-19
Authors: Bruce Larson; Kathryn Schnippel; Buyiswa Ndibongo; Lawrence Long; Matthew P Fox; Sydney Rosen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240