Literature DB >> 21709546

A comparison of lurkers and posters within infertility online support groups.

Sumaira H Malik1, Neil S Coulson.   

Abstract

Current research shows that online support groups can offer people affected by infertility a unique and valuable source of social support. However, to date most research has focused on the experiences of people who post messages to online infertility support groups; in comparison, little is known about how "lurkers" (i.e., those individuals who read messages but do not post messages) use and benefit from online infertility support groups. The purpose of the present study was to compare the use and experience of online infertility support groups between lurkers and posters. A total of 295 participants who were recruited from several online infertility support groups completed an online questionnaire containing questions about their use and experience of online support groups and measures of loneliness, social support, marital satisfaction, and perceived infertility-related stress. Differences between lurkers and posters were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and χ or Fisher exact tests. Results revealed that compared with posters, lurkers visited the online support groups less often and scored significantly lower in overall satisfaction with the online support group. However, both lurkers and posters reported gaining a range of unique benefits from access to an online support group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in loneliness, social support, infertility-related stress, and marital satisfaction between lurkers and posters. These findings suggest that reading messages posted to online support groups may be as beneficial as interacting with the group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709546     DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e318224b31d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs        ISSN: 1538-2931            Impact factor:   1.985


  8 in total

Review 1.  Addressing engagement in technology-based behavioural HIV interventions through paradata metrics.

Authors:  José A Bauermeister; Jesse M Golinkoff; Kathryn E Muessig; Keith J Horvath; Lisa B Hightow-Weidman
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Clinical Questions in Online Health Communities: The Case of "See your doctor" Threads.

Authors:  Jina Huh
Journal:  CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work       Date:  2015

3.  Patient moderator interaction in online health communities.

Authors:  Jina Huh; David W McDonald; Andrea Hartzler; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

4.  'I felt less alone knowing I could contribute to the forum': psychological distress and use of an online infertility peer support forum.

Authors:  Siobhan Bernadette Laura O'Connell; Eden Noah Gelgoot; Paul Henry Grunberg; Joy Schinazi; Deborah Da Costa; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Zeev Rosberger; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-11

5.  "So Much of This Story Could Be Me": Men's Use of Support in Online Infertility Discussion Boards.

Authors:  Jeremie Richard; Icoquih Badillo-Amberg; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-10-04

6.  "It's Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope": Content Analysis of Infertility-Related Videos on YouTube in Relation to Viewer Preferences.

Authors:  Margot Kelly-Hedrick; Paul H Grunberg; Felicia Brochu; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  The role of social media for persons affected by infertility.

Authors:  Taina Sormunen; Klas Karlgren; Arthur Aanesen; Bjöörn Fossum; Margareta Westerbotn
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  The effectiveness of an Internet support forum for carers of people with dementia: a pre-post cohort study.

Authors:  Vicky McKechnie; Chris Barker; Josh Stott
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.