Literature DB >> 21708741

How terrestrial organisms sense, signal, and respond to carbon dioxide.

Rowan F Sage1.   

Abstract

Because of anthropogenic increases in atmospheric CO(2) content, there is a need to understand how organisms sense and respond to CO(2) variation. An important distinction is whether CO(2) responses result from direct effects of CO(2) on signal-transduction pathways, enzyme catalysis, or regulatory processes, as opposed to indirect, secondary responses that are a consequence of the direct effects. In plants, direct effects occur because rising CO(2) A) increases the activity of Ribulose-1,5-bisphopshate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) via its role as a substrate for RuBP carboxylation and its inhibition of RuBP oxygenation; B) reduces stomatal aperture; C) alters mitochondrial respiration; and D) possibly reduces transcription of genes for Rubisco activase and carbonic anhydrase. Because of these direct effects, the carbon and water balance of plants is altered leading to secondary effects on growth, resource partitioning and defense compound synthesis. Reduced investment in photosynthetic protein is one of the characteristic acclimation responses of plants to high CO(2). This is modulated by increased carbohydrate levels, probably in concert with hormone signals from the roots. Roots are hypothesized to be the main control points for CO(2) acclimation because they are well situated to integrate the carbohydrate status of the plant. In higher fungi, development of the mushroom fruiting body is inhibited at high CO(2), but the mechanism is poorly known. Fungal CO(2) sensing may serve to position the spore-bearing tissue above the soil boundary layer to ensure effective spore dispersal. The animals that are most sensitive to anthropogenic CO(2) enrichment are insects. Many insects have a well-developed ability to sense CO(2) variation as a means of locating food. Unlike plants, insects have CO(2) receptors that can detect variation in CO(2) as low as 0.5 ppm. However, the sensitivity of these receptors is reduced in atmospheres with double or triple current levels of CO(2), indicating some insect species may be threatened by rising atmospheric CO(2).

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 21708741     DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.3.469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  8 in total

1.  Evolution and challenges of dynamic global vegetation models for some aspects of plant physiology and elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  L F C Rezende; B C Arenque; S T Aidar; M S B Moura; C Von Randow; E Tourigny; R S C Menezes; J P H B Ometto
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Effect of natural gas flaring upon the butterfly, Eurema hecabe (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) and its host plant, Cassia tora (Fabales: Fabaceae) in two group gathering stations of Assam, India: an approach of environmental monitoring.

Authors:  Bitopan Sarma; Pranab Ram Bhattacharyya; Mantu Bhuyan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Regulatory components of carbon concentrating mechanisms in aquatic unicellular photosynthetic organisms.

Authors:  Vandana Tomar; Gurpreet Kaur Sidhu; Panchsheela Nogia; Rajesh Mehrotra; Sandhya Mehrotra
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Effects of different elevated CO2 concentrations on chlorophyll contents, gas exchange, water use efficiency, and PSII activity on C3 and C4 cereal crops in a closed artificial ecosystem.

Authors:  Minjuan Wang; Beizhen Xie; Yuming Fu; Chen Dong; Liu Hui; Liu Guanghui; Hong Liu
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Carbon starvation in glacial trees recovered from the La Brea tar pits, southern California.

Authors:  Joy K Ward; John M Harris; Thure E Cerling; Alex Wiedenhoeft; Michael J Lott; Maria-Denise Dearing; Joan B Coltrain; James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How do drought and warming influence survival and wood traits of Picea mariana saplings?

Authors:  Lorena Balducci; Annie Deslauriers; Alessio Giovannelli; Marilène Beaulieu; Sylvain Delzon; Sergio Rossi; Cyrille B K Rathgeber
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Short-Range Responses of the Kissing Bug Triatoma rubida (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) to Carbon Dioxide, Moisture, and Artificial Light.

Authors:  Andres Indacochea; Charlotte C Gard; Immo A Hansen; Jane Pierce; Alvaro Romero
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Nepenthes pitchers are CO2-enriched cavities, emit CO2 to attract preys.

Authors:  Sabulal Baby; Anil John Johnson; Elavinamannil Jacob Zachariah; Abdul Azeez Hussain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.