Literature DB >> 21707433

Assays to determine DNA repair ability.

Vanessa Valdiglesias1, Eduardo Pásaro, Josefina Méndez, Blanca Laffon.   

Abstract

DNA repair is crucial to the integrity of the human genome since mammalian cells are continuously exposed to different chemical and physical genotoxic agents. To counteract the lesions induced by these agents, organisms have developed a number of highly conserved repair mechanisms involving numerous protein complexes grouped in several different repair pathways. The importance of studying the individual capacity to repair DNA damage lies in the observation that deficient repair mechanisms of the genome have been linked to the presence of large number of diseases and cancer, and alterations in these mechanisms may also alter the susceptibility of individuals exposed to a particular mutagen. This review focused on the current knowledge of different assays developed to evaluate DNA repair capacity (DRC). These assays, which are grouped into five major categories, have been successfully applied in (1) in vitro studies, (2) epidemiological studies in patients with cancer or other different pathologies, and (3) environmentally or occupationally exposed populations. Nevertheless, some of the limitations include high interlaboratory variability and difficulty to implement the assays on a large scale. The selection of an adequate DRC assay needs to be made on the basis of the objective raised for its application and taking into account a number of determining factors, namely, (1) speed and cost, (2) type of DNA repair to be evaluated, and (3) sample availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21707433     DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2011.582320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  3 in total

1.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

2.  Expanded usage of the Challenge-Comet assay as a DNA repair biomarker in human populations: protocols for fresh and cryopreserved blood samples, and for different challenge agents.

Authors:  Vanessa Valdiglesias; María Sánchez-Flores; Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; William Au; Eduardo Pásaro; Blanca Laffon
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Okadaic acid: more than a diarrheic toxin.

Authors:  Vanessa Valdiglesias; María Verónica Prego-Faraldo; Eduardo Pásaro; Josefina Méndez; Blanca Laffon
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.118

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.