Literature DB >> 21707166

Choke or thrive? The relation between salivary cortisol and math performance depends on individual differences in working memory and math-anxiety.

Andrew Mattarella-Micke1, Jill Mateo, Megan N Kozak, Katherine Foster, Sian L Beilock.   

Abstract

In the current study, we explored how a person's physiological arousal relates to their performance in a challenging math situation as a function of individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity and math-anxiety. Participants completed demanding math problems before and after which salivary cortisol, an index of arousal, was measured. The performance of lower WM individuals did not depend on cortisol concentration or math-anxiety. For higher WM individuals high in math-anxiety, the higher their concentration of salivary cortisol following the math task, the worse their performance. In contrast, for higher WM individuals lower in math-anxiety, the higher their salivary cortisol concentrations, the better their performance. For individuals who have the capacity to perform at a high-level (higher WMs), whether physiological arousal will lead an individual to choke or thrive depends on math-anxiety. 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21707166     DOI: 10.1037/a0023224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  21 in total

1.  Specifying the mechanisms behind benefits of saving-enhanced memory.

Authors:  Yannick Runge; Christian Frings; Tobias Tempel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 2.  Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases.

Authors:  Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni; María Isabel Núñez-Peña; Àngels Colomé
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Reactivity to stress and the cognitive components of math disability in grade 1 children.

Authors:  Maureen A MacKinnon McQuarrie; Linda S Siegel; Nancy E Perry; Joanne Weinberg
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-11-02

4.  HPA axis function predicts development of working memory in boys with FXS.

Authors:  Jessica F Scherr; Laura J Hahn; Stephen R Hooper; Deborah Hatton; Jane E Roberts
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Is Math Anxiety Always Bad for Math Learning? The Role of Math Motivation.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Sarah L Lukowski; Sara A Hart; Ian M Lyons; Lee A Thompson; Yulia Kovas; Michèle M M Mazzocco; Robert Plomin; Stephen A Petrill
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-10-30

6.  The cortisol response to anticipated intergroup interactions predicts self-reported prejudice.

Authors:  Erik Bijleveld; Daan Scheepers; Naomi Ellemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.

Authors:  Grace E Giles; Caroline R Mahoney; Tad T Brunyé; Holly A Taylor; Robin B Kanarek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cognition-emotion interactions: patterns of change and implications for math problem solving.

Authors:  Kelly Trezise; Robert A Reeve
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-31

Review 9.  Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: a potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility to biases.

Authors:  Kinga Morsanyi; Chiara Busdraghi; Caterina Primi
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.