Literature DB >> 21706222

Probability Steiner trees and maximum parsimony in phylogenetic analysis.

J F Weng1, I Mareels, D A Thomas.   

Abstract

The phylogenetic tree (PT) problem has been studied by a number of researchers as an application of the Steiner tree problem, a well-known network optimisation problem. Of all the methods developed for phylogenies the maximum parsimony (MP) method is a simple and commonly used method because it relies on directly observable changes in the input nucleotide or amino acid sequences. In this paper we show that the non-uniqueness of the evolutionary pathways in the MP method leads us to consider a new model of PTs. In this so-called probability representation model, for each site a node in a PT is modelled by a probability distribution of nucleotide or amino acid states, and hence the PT at a given site is a probability Steiner tree, i.e. a Steiner tree in a high-dimensional vector space. In spite of the generality of the probability representation model, in this paper we restrict our study to constructing probability phylogenetic trees (PPT) using the parsimony criterion, as well as discussing and comparing our approach with the classical MP method. We show that for a given input set although the optimal topology as well as the total tree length of the PPT is the same as the PT constructed by the classical MP method, the inferred ancestral states and branch lengths are different and the results given by our method provide a plausible alternative to the classical ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21706222     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0442-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  4 in total

1.  Maximum parsimony, substitution model, and probability phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J F Weng; D A Thomas; I Mareels
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Adaptive evolution in the stomach lysozymes of foregut fermenters.

Authors:  C B Stewart; J W Schilling; A C Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Nov 26-Dec 2       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Mammalian evolution and the interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP) gene: convincing evidence for several superordinal clades.

Authors:  M J Stanhope; M R Smith; V G Waddell; C A Porter; M S Shivji; M Goodman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.395

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Inference of single-cell phylogenies from lineage tracing data using Cassiopeia.

Authors:  Matthew G Jones; Alex Khodaverdian; Jeffrey J Quinn; Michelle M Chan; Jeffrey A Hussmann; Robert Wang; Chenling Xu; Jonathan S Weissman; Nir Yosef
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 13.583

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.