Literature DB >> 21704962

The influence of hospital type on induction of labor and mode of delivery.

Candice C Snyder1, Katherine B Wolfe, Ryan W Loftin, Sammy Tabbah, David F Lewis, Emily A Defranco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare labor induction and cesarean delivery rates at term in community vs university hospitals. STUDY
DESIGN: A population-based retrospective cohort study of births was performed. Primary outcomes were term gestation at <39 weeks, labor induction, and cesarean delivery. After we adjusted for comorbidities, malpresentation, and previous cesarean delivery, logistic regression assessed the association between hospital type and primary outcomes.
RESULTS: Births occur less often in week 37 (n = 24390 [11%] vs 4006 [13%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-0.9) and are similar in week 38 in community vs university hospitals. Inductions occur more commonly in community vs university settings at 37 weeks (n = 6440 [27%] vs 757 [19%]; adjusted OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-1.8) and at 38 weeks (n = 16586 [31%] vs 1530 [21%]; adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.7-1.9). Cesarean rates are no different between hospital types.
CONCLUSION: Induction is 70-80% more likely at community vs university hospitals before the optimal gestational age of ≥ 39 weeks, but cesarean delivery rates do not differ at term.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704962     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  The impact of hospital obstetric volume on maternal outcomes in term, non-low-birthweight pregnancies.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Yvonne W Cheng; Cathy L Emeis; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Timing and Mode of Delivery in Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease- an Analysis of Practices within the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC).

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Tina Ahn Thu Thi Nguyen; Myriam Almeida-Jones; Nina Boe; Laila Rhee; Tracy Anton; Mark Sklansky; Maryam Tarsa; Gary Satou; Anita J Moon-Grady
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Epidemiologic considerations: scope of problem and disparity concerns.

Authors:  Darios Getahun
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Association between Hospital Birth Volume and Maternal Morbidity among Low-Risk Pregnancies in Rural, Urban, and Teaching Hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Viengneesee Thao; Peiyin Hung; Ellen Tilden; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Esra Zhubi; Krenare Grezda; Blerta Kryeziu; Jeta Bunjaku; Fitim Sadiku; Riaz Agahi; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Manila Bonciani; George Little
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.