BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered to be the single most effective tool to prevent health care-associated infections. Daily hand hygiene opportunities and compliance for pediatric/neonatal intensive care units (ICU) are currently unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in pediatric and neonatal ICU patients with analyses of hand hygiene behavior in relation to profession, indication, and shift and correlation with disinfectant usage. RESULTS: Hand hygiene opportunities were significantly higher for pediatric (321/24 hours) than neonatal (194/24 hours; P = .024) patients. Observed compliance rates were 53% (pediatric) and 61% (neonatal) and found to be significantly higher in nurses (57%; 66%) than in physicians (29%, 52%, respectively; P < .001; P = .017, respectively). For neonates, compliance rates were significantly higher before patient contact and aseptic tasks (78%) than after patient, patient body fluid, or patients' surrounding contact (57%; P < .001). Calculating disinfectant usage revealed a 3-fold lower compliance rate of 17%. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first data on opportunities for and compliance with hand hygiene in pediatric/neonatal patients encompassing the whole day and night activities and including a comparison of observed and calculated compliance rates. Observation revealed high compliance especially in nurses and in situations of greatest impact. The data provide a detailed characterization of hand hygiene performance in the neonatal/pediatric ICU setting.
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered to be the single most effective tool to prevent health care-associated infections. Daily hand hygiene opportunities and compliance for pediatric/neonatal intensive care units (ICU) are currently unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in pediatric and neonatal ICUpatients with analyses of hand hygiene behavior in relation to profession, indication, and shift and correlation with disinfectant usage. RESULTS: Hand hygiene opportunities were significantly higher for pediatric (321/24 hours) than neonatal (194/24 hours; P = .024) patients. Observed compliance rates were 53% (pediatric) and 61% (neonatal) and found to be significantly higher in nurses (57%; 66%) than in physicians (29%, 52%, respectively; P < .001; P = .017, respectively). For neonates, compliance rates were significantly higher before patient contact and aseptic tasks (78%) than after patient, patient body fluid, or patients' surrounding contact (57%; P < .001). Calculating disinfectant usage revealed a 3-fold lower compliance rate of 17%. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first data on opportunities for and compliance with hand hygiene in pediatric/neonatal patients encompassing the whole day and night activities and including a comparison of observed and calculated compliance rates. Observation revealed high compliance especially in nurses and in situations of greatest impact. The data provide a detailed characterization of hand hygiene performance in the neonatal/pediatric ICU setting.
Authors: Hossam S Alslaim; Jonathan Chan; Fozia Saleem-Rasheed; Yousef Ibrahim; Patrick Karabon; Nathan Novotny Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Milena Trifunovic-Koenig; Stefan Bushuven; Bianka Gerber; Baerbel Otto; Markus Dettenkofer; Florian Salm; Martin R Fischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Robyn Mitchell; Virginia Roth; Denise Gravel; George Astrakianakis; Elizabeth Bryce; Sarah Forgie; Lynn Johnston; Geoffrey Taylor; Mary Vearncombe Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 2.918