S Scheithauer1, F Eitner, H Häfner, J Floege, S W Lemmen. 1. Department of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. sscheithauer@ukaachen.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: In a previous observational intervention study, we achieved a more than 100 % increase in overall hand hygiene (HH) compliance in the hemodialysis setting by increasing the number of hand rubs (HR) performed and concomitantly optimizing HH standard operating procedures (SOPs). SOPs were mainly aimed at reducing the number of avoidable opportunities due to a less than perfect workflow. However, the long-term sustainability of this successful intervention was not evaluated. The present study was carried out to evaluate the long-term effects of our previous successful intervention. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up observational study 1 year after the first intervention study in the same hemodialysis unit to assess the sustainability. No HH-related interventions were performed in the 1 year between studies. The main outcome was HH compliance, and the secondary outcome was opportunities per hemodialysis procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1,574 opportunities for HH and 871 hand rubs (HR) were observed during the follow-up observational study. Overall, compliance was 55 %, which was significantly than that at the end of the first study (62 %; p < 0.0001), but significantly higher than that at the start and mid-term phases of the first study (37 and 49 %, p < 0.0001). Both the decrease in HH opportunities and the increase in HR were sustained over the course of this observational study. The number of avoidable opportunities in the present study was similar to that at the end of the previous study. Thus, in 320 opportunities (20 %), gloves were worn instead of HR performed, representing 46 % of all missed HR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a decrease in HH compliance compared to the last postintervention period, a multifaceted intervention focusing on standardization and workflow optimization resulted in a sustained improvement in HH. We therefore propose that standardization of the hemodialysis workflow aimed at improving HH is a promising avenue for improving the quality of patient care and outcome.
PURPOSE: In a previous observational intervention study, we achieved a more than 100 % increase in overall hand hygiene (HH) compliance in the hemodialysis setting by increasing the number of hand rubs (HR) performed and concomitantly optimizing HH standard operating procedures (SOPs). SOPs were mainly aimed at reducing the number of avoidable opportunities due to a less than perfect workflow. However, the long-term sustainability of this successful intervention was not evaluated. The present study was carried out to evaluate the long-term effects of our previous successful intervention. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up observational study 1 year after the first intervention study in the same hemodialysis unit to assess the sustainability. No HH-related interventions were performed in the 1 year between studies. The main outcome was HH compliance, and the secondary outcome was opportunities per hemodialysis procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1,574 opportunities for HH and 871 hand rubs (HR) were observed during the follow-up observational study. Overall, compliance was 55 %, which was significantly than that at the end of the first study (62 %; p < 0.0001), but significantly higher than that at the start and mid-term phases of the first study (37 and 49 %, p < 0.0001). Both the decrease in HH opportunities and the increase in HR were sustained over the course of this observational study. The number of avoidable opportunities in the present study was similar to that at the end of the previous study. Thus, in 320 opportunities (20 %), gloves were worn instead of HR performed, representing 46 % of all missed HR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a decrease in HH compliance compared to the last postintervention period, a multifaceted intervention focusing on standardization and workflow optimization resulted in a sustained improvement in HH. We therefore propose that standardization of the hemodialysis workflow aimed at improving HH is a promising avenue for improving the quality of patient care and outcome.
Authors: Hanan Aboumatar; Polly Ristaino; Richard O Davis; Carol B Thompson; Lisa Maragakis; Sara Cosgrove; Beryl Rosenstein; Trish M Perl Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: S Scheithauer; A Oberröhrmann; H Haefner; R Kopp; T Schürholz; T Schwanz; A Engels; S W Lemmen Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Vicki Erasmus; Thea J Daha; Hans Brug; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Myra D Behrendt; Margreet C Vos; Ed F van Beeck Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Paul D R Johnson; Rhea Martin; Laurelle J Burrell; Elizabeth A Grabsch; Susan W Kirsa; Jason O'Keeffe; Barrie C Mayall; Deidre Edmonds; Wendy Barr; Christopher Bolger; Humsha Naidoo; M Lindsay Grayson Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2005-11-21 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Simone Scheithauer; Frank Eitner; Jennifer Mankartz; Helga Haefner; Katharina Nowicki; Jürgen Floege; Sebastian W Lemmen Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: M Dolores Arenas; José Sánchez-Payá; Guillermina Barril; Juan García-Valdecasas; Jose Luis Gorriz; Antonio Soriano; Andres Antolin; José Lacueva; Sergio García; Ana Sirvent; Mario Espinosa; Manuel Angoso Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Shira I Doron; Kayoko Kifuji; Brooke Tyson Hynes; Dan Dunlop; Tricia Lemon; Karen Hansjosten; Teresa Cheung; Barbara Curley; David R Snydman; David G Fairchild Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2011-01