| Literature DB >> 21702918 |
Siok-Fong Chin1, Johari Ibahim, Suzana Makpol, Noor Aini Abdul Hamid, Azian Abdul Latiff, Zaiton Zakaria, Musalmah Mazlan, Yasmin Anum Mohd Yusof, Aminuddin Abdul Karim, Wan Zurinah Wan Ngah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin E supplements containing tocotrienols are now being recommended for optimum health but its effects are scarcely known. The objective was to determine the effects of Tocotrienol Rich Fraction (TRF) supplementation on lipid profile and oxidative status in healthy older individuals at a dose of 160 mg/day for 6 months.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21702918 PMCID: PMC3148956 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-8-42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Baseline and intervention characteristics of the study groups
| Placebo (n = 30) | TRF (n = 32) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35-49 years | > 50 years | 35-49 years | > 50 years | |
| Age (years) | 44.7 ± 0.9 a | 59.1 ± 1.7 a | 44.5 ± 1.0 b | 56.1 ± 1.2 b |
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | ||||
| Systolic | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 121 ± 2.8 c | 137 ± 3.6 c | 121 ± 3.5 d | 131 ± 3.3 d |
| 3 months | 123 ± 2.4 f | 137 ± 5.1 f | 121 ± 3.4 | 131 ± 3.5 |
| 6 months | 120 ± 2.5 g | 135 ± 5.0 g | 122 ± 3.6 | 132 ± 3.3 |
| Diastolic | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 75.4 ± 1.9 e | 82.0 ± 2.7 e | 80.6 ± 2.8 | 81.3 ± 2.6 |
| 3 months | 73.7 ± 1.7 | 79.2 ± 2.9 | 79.2 ± 2.6 | 82.3 ± 2.6 |
| 6 months | 75.7 ± 2.8 | 79.2 ± 3.3 | 79.0 ± 3.1 | 82.8 ± 1.9 |
| Pulse (beat/minute) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 73 ± 2 | 73 ± 3 | 70 ± 3 | 70 ± 2 |
| 3 months | 70 ± 2 | 72 ± 2 | 71 ± 3 | 71 ± 2 |
| 6 months | 71 ± 2 | 71 ± 3 | 69 ± 3 | 72 ± 2 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 27.5 ± 1.2 | 26.3 ± 0.6 | 26.3 ± 0.7 | 27.7 ± 1.3 |
| 3 months | 27.5 ± 1.2 | 25.0 ± 1.0 | 25.6 ± 0.6 | 27.4 ± 1.2 |
| 6 months | 26.8 ± 1.2 | 25.2 ± 1.0 | 25.7 ± 0.7 | 27.1 ± 1.1 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 5.53 ± 0.33 | 5.34 ± 0.13 | 5.74 ± 0.30 | 5.49 ± 0.10 |
| 3 months | 5.40 ± 0.44 | 5.37 ± 0.10 | 5.59 ± 0.22 | 5.24 ± 0.15 |
| 6 months | 5.55 ± 0.49 | 5.28 ± 0.14 | 5.42 ± 0.19 | 5.47 ± 0.11 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Same letters indicate significant difference between 35-49 and > 50 year-old groups.
a: p < 0.001, b: p < 0.001, c: p < 0.001, d: p < 0.05, e: p < 0.05, f: p < 0.001, g: p < 0.01
Lipid profiles of study groups
| Age group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35-49 years | > 50 years | |||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| TC (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 5.12 ± 0.19 | 5.34 ± 0.18 | 5.30 ± 0.20 | 5.43 ± 0.19 |
| 3 months | 4.91 ± 0.17 | 5.39 ± 0.16 | 5.39 ± 0.18 | 5.43 ± 0.20 |
| 6 months | 5.04 ± 0.17 | 5.47 ± 0.15 | 5.34 ± 0.21 | 5.44 ± 0.20 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 1.37 ± 0.07 | 1.24 ± 0.07 | 1.35 ± 0.09 | 1.36 ± 0.10 |
| 3 months | 1.42 ± 0.10 | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 1.32 ± 0.10 |
| 6 months | 1.41 ± 0.10 | 1.42 ± 0.07* | 1.28 ± 0.07 a | 1.47 ± 0.07 a |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 3.28 ± 0.18 | 3.40 ± 0.20 | 3.28 ± 0.20 | 3.42 ± 0.15 |
| 3 months | 2.99 ± 0.17 | 3.45 ± 0.15 | 3.18 ± 0.17 | 3.45 ± 0.18 |
| 6 months | 3.15 ± 0.17 | 3.40 ± 0.15 | 3.53 ± 0.16 | 3.23 ± 0.18 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 1.12 ± 0.15 | 1.39 ± 0.20 | 1.41 ± 0.19 | 1.46 ± 0.26 |
| 3 months | 1.23 ± 0.12 | 1.25 ± 0.17 | 1.58 ± 0.23 | 1.44 ± 0.25 |
| 6 months | 1.02 ± 0.10 b | 1.48 ± 0.25 | 1.45 ± 0.25 b | 1.57 ± 0.30 |
| HDL-C/TC | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 26.58 ± 1.44 | 23.14 ± 1.63 | 26.30 ± 2.26 | 24.73 ± 1.56 |
| 3 months | 28.53 ± 1.97 | 24.82 ± 1.36 | 27.30 ± 2.21 | 24.53 ± 1.81 |
| 6 months | 28.89 ± 1.67 | 25.91 ± 1.53** | 24.92 ± 1.82 c | 28.13 ± 1.52* c |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM
Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month)
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Same characters indicate significant difference as compared to placebo group.
a: p = 0.022, b: p = 0.022, c: p = 0.04
Plasma antioxidant vitamins in placebo and TRF groups
| Duration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant vitamins | 0 month | 3 months | 6 months | |||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| Lipid-corrected total vitamin E (g/mol) | 9.76 ± 0.38 | 9.35 ± 0.39 | 10.02 ± 0.20 | 10.44 ± 0.35** | 9.26 ± 0.45 | 11.74 ± 0.57** |
| Lipid-corrected total tocopherol (g/mol) | 9.16 ± 0.37 | 8.78 ± 0.40 | 9.53 ± 0.22 | 9.83 ± 0.37** | 8.55 ± 0.41 | 10.96 ± 0.54** |
| Lipid-corrected total tocotrienol (g/mol) | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.07** |
| Vitamin C (mg/L) | 5.09 ± 0.30 | 4.23 ± 0.26 | 5.86 ± 0.30* | 5.29 ± 0.29** | 6.07 ± 0.31** | 5.14 ± 0.37** |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month).
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Plasma antioxidant vitamins according to age group
| Age group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant vitamins | 35-49 years | > 50 years | ||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| Lipid-corrected total vitamin E (g/mol) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 8.71 ± 0.37 | 8.57 ± 0.43 | 10.41 ± 0.50 | 9.89 ± 0.56 |
| 3 months | 9.49 ± 0.24 | 9.59 ± 0.46 | 10.35 ± 0.25 | 11.03 ± 0.45* |
| 6 months | 9.04 ± 0.67 | 10.39 ± 0.53** | 9.52 ± 0.61 | 12.89 ± 0.85** |
| Lipid-corrected total tocopherol (g/mol) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 8.04 ± 0.33 | 7.89 ± 0.45 | 9.84 ± 0.47 | 9.39 ± 0.57 |
| 3 months | 8.92 ± 0.35 | 8.86 ± 0.46 | 9.92 ± 0.29 | 10.49 ± 0.48* |
| 6 months | 8.20 ± 0.62 | 9.66 ± 0.52** | 8.97 ± 0.52 | 12.06 ± 0.79** |
| Lipid-corrected total tocotrienol (g/mol) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 0.69 ± 0.09 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.11 | 0.50 ± 0.07 |
| 3 months | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.73 ± 0.11 | 0.46 ± 0.09 | 0.54 ± 0.07 |
| 6 months | 0.80 ± 0.09 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 0.55 ± 0.14 | 0.82 ± 0.11** |
| Vitamin C (mg/L) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 4.61 ± 0.35 | 3.95 ± 0.19 | 5.57 ± 0.47 | 4.50 ± 0.48 |
| 3 months | 5.26 ± 0.42 | 5.16 ± 0.43* | 6.48 ± 0.36 | 5.42 ± 0.39* |
| 6 months | 5.66 ± 0.32** | 4.98 ± 0.63 | 6.66 ± 0.56 | 5.26 ± 0.46** |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month).
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes activity in placebo and TRF groups
| Duration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant enzymes | 0 month | 3 months | 6 months | |||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| Superoxide dismutase (U/mg Hb) | 1.90 ± 0.09 | 2.29 ± 0.14 | 1.90 ± 0.16 | 1.83 ± 0.09** | 1.91 ± 0.13 | 1.77 ± 0.09** |
| Catalase (U/mg Hb) | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01** | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| Glutathione peroxidase (U/mg Hb) | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 1.04 ± 0.08 | 1.04 ± 0.05** | 1.09 ± 0.06* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month).
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes activity according to age group
| Age group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant enzymes | 35-49 years | > 50 years | ||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| Superoxide dismutase (U/mg Hb) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 1.85 ± 0.14 | 2.23 ± 0.22 | 1.89 ± 0.12 | 2.35 ± 0.20 |
| 3 months | 1.95 ± 0.16 | 1.81 ± 0.15 | 1.85 ± 0.28 | 1.85 ± 0.12* |
| 6 months | 1.98 ± 0.24 | 1.74 ± 0.14 | 1.85 ± 0.10 | 1.79 ± 0.12* |
| Catalase (U/mg Hb) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.01 |
| 3 months | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.01** | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| 6 months | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02* | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
| Glutathione peroxidase (U/mg Hb) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.06 |
| 3 months | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 1.07 ± 0.08 |
| 6 months | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 1.05 ± 0.13 | 1.19 ± 0.06* | 1.12 ± 0.06* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month).
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Figure 1Correlation between superoxide dismutase activity and age with TRF treatment for 6 months. TRF supplementation strengthened the association after 6 months. 0 month: r = 0.04, p = 0.81; 3 months: r = 0.06, p = 0.73; 6 months: r = 0.26, p = 0.21.
Figure 2Correlation between glutathione peroxidase activity and age with TRF treatment for 6 months. TRF supplementation reversed the relationship after 6 months. 0 month: r = -0.17, p = 0.40; 3 months: r = -0.16, p = 0.41; 6 months: r = 0.05, p = 0.82.
Figure 3Correlation between catalase activity and age with TRF treatment for 6 months. TRF supplementation strengthened the association after 3 and 6 months. 0 month: r = 0.16, p = 0.41; 3 months: r = 0.36, p = 0.06; 6 months: r = 0.23, p = 0.26.
Oxidative markers in placebo and TRF groups
| Duration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxidative Markers | 0 month | 3 months | 6 months | |||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| Protein carbonyl (nmol/mg) | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.04** |
| Advanced glycosylation end-product (units/ml) | 2.37 ± 0.11 | 2.38 ± 0.19 | 2.00 ± 0.15 | 2.40 ± 0.18 | 1.93 ± 0.17 | 1.92 ± 0.14 |
| Malondialdehyde (nmol/ml) | 4.21 ± 0.19 | 4.10 ± 0.30 | 4.00 ± 0.24 | 3.90 ± 0.25 | 3.91 ± 0.23 | 4.14 ± 0.22 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month).
**: p < 0.01
Oxidative markers according to age group
| Age group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxidative markers | 35-49 years | > 50 years | ||
| Placebo | TRF | Placebo | TRF | |
| Protein carbonyl (nmol/mg) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.03 |
| 3 months | 0.56 ± 0.13 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.52 ± 0.06 |
| 6 months | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.40 ± 0.03** |
| Advanced glycosylation end-product (units/ml) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 2.39 ± 0.15 | 2.10 ± 0.22 | 2.34 ± 0.22 | 2.73 ± 0.26 |
| 3 months | 2.01 ± 0.18 | 2.38 ± 0.21 | 2.30 ± 0.26 | 2.24 ± 0.35 |
| 6 months | 2.12 ± 0.22 | 2.02 ± 0.17 | 1.98 ± 0.25 | 1.71 ± 0.24* |
| Malondialdehyde (nmol/ml) | ||||
| Baseline (0 month) | 4.25 ± 0.30 | 3.45 ± 0.37 | 4.18 ± 0.23 | 4.71 ± 0.41 |
| 3 months | 4.82 ± 0.34 | 3.95 ± 0.39 | 3.22 ± 0.22 | 3.86 ± 0.34 |
| 6 months | 3.95 ± 0.31 | 4.48 ± 0.27 | 3.87 ± 0.36 | 3.87 ± 0.32 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Symbols indicate significant difference from baseline (0 month).
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.001
Figure 4Correlation between plasma protein carbonyl levels and age with TRF treatment for 6 months. TRF supplementation weakened the association after 3 and 6 months. 0 month: r = 0.21, p = 0.31; 3 months: r = 0.004, p = 0.98; 6 months: r = -0.15, p = 0.47.
Figure 5Correlation between serum advanced glycosylation end-products and age with TRF treatment for 6 months. TRF supplementation reversed the association after 3 and 6 months. 0 month: r = 0.18, p = 0.21; 3 months: r = -0.13, p = 0.37; 6 months: r = -0.12, p = 0.47.
Figure 6Correlation between plasma malondialdehyde levels and age with TRF treatment for 6 months. TRF supplementation reversed the association after 3 and 6 months. 0 month: r = 0.17, p = 0.25; 3 months: r = -0.19, p = 0.22; 6 months: r = -0.37, p = 0.02.