PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of colorectal liver metastases between gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on 3.0 Tesla (T) system, and then to determine whether a combination of the two techniques may improve the diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent MR imaging at 3.0T, including DWI (DWI set) and dynamic and hepatobiliary phase EOB-MRI (EOB set) for the preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. All suspicious metastases were confirmed by hepatic surgery. Two blinded readers independently reviewed three different image sets, which consisted of DWI set, EOB set, and combined set. The accuracy was assessed by the area (Az) under the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic curve, and the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. RESULTS: We found a total of 78 confirmed colorectal liver metastases in 42 of 47 patients. Each reader noted higher diagnostic accuracy of combined set of EOB-MRI and DWI than DWI set and EOB set, without statistical significance. Regardless of the size of colorectal liver metastasis, each reader detected significantly more metastases on combined set than on DWI set, and PPV was significantly higher with DWI set than with EOB set or with combined set for one reader. CONCLUSION: EOB-MRI was more useful for the detection of colorectal liver metastases, while DWI was more useful for their characterization. The combination of EOB-MRI and DWI showed significantly higher accuracy and sensitivity for the preoperative detection of small colorectal liver metastases than DWI.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of colorectal liver metastases between gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on 3.0 Tesla (T) system, and then to determine whether a combination of the two techniques may improve the diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent MR imaging at 3.0T, including DWI (DWI set) and dynamic and hepatobiliary phase EOB-MRI (EOB set) for the preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. All suspicious metastases were confirmed by hepatic surgery. Two blinded readers independently reviewed three different image sets, which consisted of DWI set, EOB set, and combined set. The accuracy was assessed by the area (Az) under the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic curve, and the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. RESULTS: We found a total of 78 confirmed colorectal liver metastases in 42 of 47 patients. Each reader noted higher diagnostic accuracy of combined set of EOB-MRI and DWI than DWI set and EOB set, without statistical significance. Regardless of the size of colorectal liver metastasis, each reader detected significantly more metastases on combined set than on DWI set, and PPV was significantly higher with DWI set than with EOB set or with combined set for one reader. CONCLUSION: EOB-MRI was more useful for the detection of colorectal liver metastases, while DWI was more useful for their characterization. The combination of EOB-MRI and DWI showed significantly higher accuracy and sensitivity for the preoperative detection of small colorectal liver metastases than DWI.
Authors: Eduardo A C Costa; Guilherme M Cunha; Emmanuil Smorodinsky; Irene Cruite; An Tang; Robert M Marks; Lisa Clark; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Jason K Sicklick; Alan Hemming; Michael R Peterson; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Francesco Mungai; Filippo Pasquinelli; Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni; Gianni Virgili; Alfonso Ragozzino; Emilio Quaia; Giovanni Morana; Andrea Giovagnoni; Luigi Grazioli; Stefano Colagrande Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Mustafa R Bashir; Steven R Breault; Ryan Braun; Richard K Do; Rendon C Nelson; Scott B Reeder Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2014-04-06 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Marius E Mayerhoefer; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Michael Weber; Markus Mitterhauser; Harald Eidherr; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Raderer; Siegfried Trattnig; Andreas Herneth; Georgios Karanikas Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 5.315