Literature DB >> 21701341

Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting.

Mark L Jewell1, Richard A Baxter, Sue Ellen Cox, Lisa M Donofrio, Jeffrey S Dover, Richard G Glogau, Michael A Kane, Robert A Weiss, Patrick Martin, Joel Schlessinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound presents a noninvasive approach to body sculpting for nonobese patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for sculpting of the abdomen and flanks.
METHODS: Adults (aged 18 to 65 years) with subcutaneous abdominal fat greater than or equal to 2.5 cm thick who met screening criteria were randomized to receive high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of the anterior abdomen and flanks at energy levels (a total of three passes each) of 47 J/cm (141 J/cm total), 59 J/cm (177 J/cm), or 0 J/cm (no energy applied, sham control). The primary endpoint was change from baseline waist circumference at the iliac crest level at posttreatment week 12. Subjective aesthetic assessments included the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale and a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory values, and physical examinations.
RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, in the intent-to-treat population, statistical significance versus sham was achieved for the 59-J/cm (-2.44; p = 0.01) but not the 47-J/cm treatment group (-2.06 cm; p = 0.13). In a per-protocol population, statistical significance versus sham was achieved for both the 59-J/cm (-2.52 cm; p = 0.002) and the 47-J/cm treatment groups (-2.10 cm; p = 0.04). Investigator subjective measures of global aesthetic improvement and patient satisfaction also favored each active treatment versus sham. Adverse events included mild to moderate discomfort, bruising, and edema. Laboratory values and physical examinations were unremarkable.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with this high-intensity focused ultrasound device reduced waist circumference and was generally well tolerated for noninvasive body sculpting. Reduction in waist circumference was statistically significant with both active treatments (per protocol). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.(Figure is included in full-text article.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701341     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  A Six-week Low-level Laser Therapy Protocol is Effective for Reducing Waist, Hip, Thigh, and Upper Abdomen Circumference.

Authors:  Carl R Thornfeldt; Paul M Thaxton; Carl S Hornfeldt
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2016-06-01

2.  Morphometric analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced lipolysis on cadaveric abdominal and thigh skin.

Authors:  Sugun Lee; Hee-Jin Kim; Hyun Jun Park; Hyoung Moon Kim; So Hyun Lee; Sung Bin Cho
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Evidence-Based Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in Aesthetic Body Contouring.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; Fadl Chahine
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Nonthermal Pulsed Ultrasound Treatment for the Reduction in Abdominal Fat: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mara Weinstein Velez; Omer Ibrahim; Kathleen Petrell; Jeffrey S Dover
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01

Review 5.  [Body contouring].

Authors:  N Krüger; S Lübberding; G Sattler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Nils Krueger; Sophia V Mai; Stefanie Luebberding; Neil S Sadick
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 7.  Liposuction devices: technology update.

Authors:  Sachin M Shridharani; Justin M Broyles; Alan Matarasso
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-07-21

8.  Operator independent focused high frequency ISM band for fat reduction: porcine model.

Authors:  Robert Weiss; Margaret Weiss; Karen Beasley; Jan Vrba; Jan Bernardy
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Levels of Evidence in Cosmetic Surgery: Analysis and Recommendations Using a New CLEAR Classification.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-12-06

10.  Histological and Ultrastructural Effects of Ultrasound-induced Cavitation on Human Skin Adipose Tissue.

Authors:  Daniele Bani; Alessandro Quattrini Li; Giancarlo Freschi; Giulia Lo Russo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.