Literature DB >> 2170059

1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass.

S S Ehrmeyer1, R H Laessig, J E Leinweber, J J Oryall.   

Abstract

On March 14, 1990, the Centers for Disease Control and the Health Care Financing Administration published criteria for defining minimum performance in proficiency testing (PT). Using our previously described computer modeling technique, we determined the likelihood of passing PT under the new rules. The model relates combinations of intralaboratory CV and bias to PT performance criteria. For example, a laboratory with a bias of zero and an internal CV of 5% will pass a 10% fixed-limit PT criterion (i.e., the criterion for glucose analyses) 98% of the time when five samples are used. The model provides similar analyses for all PT criteria and all relevant combinations of CV and bias. The probability of passing PT decreases as the number of analytes tested increases, i.e., from 98% to 37% as the number of analytes increases from 1 to 20. A laboratory's internal CV has a greater effect on the outcome of PT than do the corresponding bias values. We conclude that a laboratory that operates with methods that have internal CVs less than or equal to 33% and biases less than or equal to 20% of the PT criteria will have a greater than 99% chance of passing PT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2170059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  12 in total

1.  Determining optimum hemoglobin sampling for anemia management from every-treatment data.

Authors:  Adam E Gaweda; Brian H Nathanson; Alfred A Jacobs; George R Aronoff; Michael J Germain; Michael E Brier
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Concordance between point-of-care blood gas analysis and laboratory autoanalyzer in measurement of hemoglobin and electrolytes in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Shivesh Prakash; Shailesh Bihari; Zhan Y Lim; Santosh Verghese; Hemant Kulkarni; Andrew D Bersten
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Evaluation in volunteers of the VIA V-ABG automated bedside blood gas, chemistry, and hematocrit monitor.

Authors:  P L Bailey; S W McJames; M L Cluff; D T Wells; J A Orr; D R Westenskow; S E Kern
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Agreement of Potassium, Sodium, Glucose, and Hemoglobin Measured by Blood Gas Analyzer With Dry Chemistry Analyzer and Complete Blood Count Analyzer: A Two-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Hongxiang Xie; Shiyu Lv; Sufeng Chen; Zhenzhen Pang; Deli Ye; Jianzhuang Guo; Wanju Xu; Weidong Jin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Comment on "System accuracy evaluation of the GlucoRx Nexus Voice TD-4280 blood glucose monitoring system".

Authors:  Nilesh Nathwani
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Comparison of different methods for measurement of electrolytes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sinan Yilmaz; Hilal B Uysal; Mücahit Avcil; Mustafa Yilmaz; Bekir Dağlı; Murat Bakış; Imran K Ömürlü
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Inter-instrumental comparison for the measurement of electrolytes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Vivek Pant; Arjun Tumbapo; Bipin Karki
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2017-05-16

8.  Interchangeability of Sodium and Potassium Result Values of Arterial Blood Gas with Laboratory Analyzer: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yasemin Ustundağ; Kağan Huysal; Şeyda E Ozgunay; Ali R Turkoğlu
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01

9.  Verification of quantitative analytical methods in medical laboratories.

Authors:  Ghafar Muhammad T Abdel; Muhammad I El-Masry
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Use of a blood gas analyzer and a laboratory autoanalyzer in routine practice to measure electrolytes in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Yasemin U Budak; Kagan Huysal; Murat Polat
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.