Literature DB >> 21700057

Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.

R Dassonneville1, R F Brøndum, T Druet, S Fritz, F Guillaume, B Guldbrandtsen, M S Lund, V Ducrocq, G Su.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the imputation error and loss of reliability of direct genomic values (DGV) or genomically enhanced breeding values (GEBV) when using genotypes imputed from a 3,000-marker single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel to a 50,000-marker SNP panel. Data consisted of genotypes of 15,966 European Holstein bulls from the combined EuroGenomics reference population. Genotypes with the low-density chip were created by erasing markers from 50,000-marker data. The studies were performed in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, and Sweden) using a BLUP model for prediction of DGV and in France using a genomic marker-assisted selection approach for prediction of GEBV. Imputation in both studies was done using a combination of the DAGPHASE 1.1 and Beagle 2.1.3 software. Traits considered were protein yield, fertility, somatic cell count, and udder depth. Imputation of missing markers and prediction of breeding values were performed using 2 different reference populations in each country: either a national reference population or a combined EuroGenomics reference population. Validation for accuracy of imputation and genomic prediction was done based on national test data. Mean imputation error rates when using national reference animals was 5.5 and 3.9% in the Nordic countries and France, respectively, whereas imputation based on the EuroGenomics reference data set gave mean error rates of 4.0 and 2.1%, respectively. Prediction of GEBV based on genotypes imputed with a national reference data set gave an absolute loss of 0.05 in mean reliability of GEBV in the French study, whereas a loss of 0.03 was obtained for reliability of DGV in the Nordic study. When genotypes were imputed using the EuroGenomics reference, a loss of 0.02 in mean reliability of GEBV was detected in the French study, and a loss of 0.06 was observed for the mean reliability of DGV in the Nordic study. Consequently, the reliability of DGV using the imputed SNP data was 0.38 based on national reference data, and 0.48 based on EuroGenomics reference data in the Nordic validation, and the reliability of GEBV using the imputed SNP data was 0.41 based on national reference data, and 0.44 based on EuroGenomics reference data in the French validation.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21700057     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  30 in total

1.  Genotyping, the Usefulness of Imputation to Increase SNP Density, and Imputation Methods and Tools.

Authors:  Florence Phocas
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture.

Authors:  Eduardo C G Pimentel; Monika Wensch-Dorendorf; Sven König; Hermann H Swalve
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program.

Authors:  Florian Sitzenstock; Florence Ytournel; Ahmad R Sharifi; David Cavero; Helge Täubert; Rudolf Preisinger; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Design of a bovine low-density SNP array optimized for imputation.

Authors:  Didier Boichard; Hoyoung Chung; Romain Dassonneville; Xavier David; André Eggen; Sébastien Fritz; Kimberly J Gietzen; Ben J Hayes; Cynthia T Lawley; Tad S Sonstegard; Curtis P Van Tassell; Paul M VanRaden; Karine A Viaud-Martinez; George R Wiggans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in four US pig breeds.

Authors:  Yvonne M Badke; Ronald O Bates; Catherine W Ernst; Clint Schwab; Juan P Steibel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.

Authors:  Sofiene Karoui; María Jesús Carabaño; Clara Díaz; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Gerhard Moser; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.

Authors:  Hubert Pausch; Bernhard Aigner; Reiner Emmerling; Christian Edel; Kay-Uwe Götz; Ruedi Fries
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy.

Authors:  Jessica E Rutkoski; Jesse Poland; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.

Authors:  Tatiane C S Chud; Ricardo V Ventura; Flavio S Schenkel; Roberto Carvalheiro; Marcos E Buzanskas; Jaqueline O Rosa; Maurício de Alvarenga Mudadu; Marcos Vinicius G B da Silva; Fabiana B Mokry; Cintia R Marcondes; Luciana C A Regitano; Danísio P Munari
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.