Literature DB >> 21700044

The use of a radiotelemetric ruminal bolus to detect body temperature changes in lactating dairy cattle.

O Alzahal1, H Alzahal, M A Steele, M Van Schaik, I Kyriazakis, T F Duffield, B W McBride.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate the efficacy of a radiotelemetric bolus (RTB) to detect changes in ruminal temperature resulting from (1) systemic illnesses that are associated with febrile responses and (2) subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA). Eight rumen-fistulated, lactating Holstein cows (586±37 kg of body weight, 106±18 d in milk) were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Each period consisted of 21 d. The factors were 2 diets, a moderate forage:concentrate [MFC; 52:48; % of dry matter (DM)] or a high forage:concentrate (HFC; 65:35, % of DM) total mixed ration, and a challenge with a single intramammary injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 μg derived from Escherichia coli 0111:B4) or no LPS (sterile saline). Thus, the 4 resulting treatments were (1) MFC with LPS challenge, (2) MFC with saline, (3) HFC with LPS challenge, and (4) HFC with saline. Cows were fed at 0800 and 1400 h daily. Cows received the intramammary injections at 0900 h of d 21. Ruminal pH and ruminal temperature were also measured on d 21 every minute via an indwelling logging system that resided in the ventral sac of the rumen and via a radiotelemetric bolus that resided in the reticulum. Vaginal temperature was also recorded every minute via temperature loggers. Prior to LPS injection, the duration of rumen pH below 5.6 (indicative of SARA) was higher in cows receiving MFC than cows receiving HFC (148±24 and 62±24 min/d, respectively). The temperature measured at the same time via RTB was higher for MFC than HFC cows (167±21 vs. 104 vs. 21 min/d above 38.8°C, respectively). The following day, cows challenged with LPS showed signs of mastitis within the injected quarters, depressed DM intake, decreased milk yield, and a peak vaginal temperature of 41.3±0.1°C 5.5h after the LPS injection. The RTB system successfully detected a fever response parallel to that measured by the vaginal loggers but temperature peak detected by RTB was, on average, 0.5°C lower than that detected by the vaginal logger. Although the RTB system was able to detect a temperature response to the diet effect before LPS challenge, it was unable to detect this effect during the LPS challenge, likely because cows receiving the LPS challenge had decreased feed consumption. In conclusion, radiotelemetry has the potential to improve the detection of SARA and fever on farm.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21700044     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Placement of temperature probe in bovine vagina for continuous measurement of core-body temperature.

Authors:  C N Lee; K G Gebremedhin; A Parkhurst; P E Hillman
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Limited efficacy of Fever Tag(®) temperature sensing ear tags in calves with naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease or induced bovine viral diarrhea virus infection.

Authors:  Robert McCorkell; Katherine Wynne-Edwards; Claire Windeyer; Al Schaefer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Heat loss efficiency and HSPs gene expression of Nellore cows in tropical climate conditions.

Authors:  Henrique Barbosa Hooper; Cristiane Gonçalves Titto; Angela Maria Gonella-Diaza; Fábio Luís Henrique; Lina Fernanda Pulido-Rodríguez; Ana Luisa Silva Longo; Thays Mayra da Cunha Leme-Dos-Santos; Ana Carina Alves Pereira de Mira Geraldo; Alfredo Manuel Franco Pereira; Mario Binelli; Júlio Cesar de Carvalho Balieiro; Evaldo Antonio Lencioni Titto
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Evaluation of reticulorumen temperature boluses for the diagnosis of subclinical cases of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Emilie A-L Flattot; Tony R Batterham; Edouard Timsit; Brad J White; Joe P McMeniman; Michael P Ward; Luciano A González
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Evaluation of ruminal motility in cattle by a bolus-type wireless sensor.

Authors:  Shozo Arai; Hironao Okada; Hiroshi Sawada; Yuji Takahashi; Kumiko Kimura; Toshihiro Itoh
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Evaluation of ruminal motility using an indwelling 3-axis accelerometer in the reticulum in cattle.

Authors:  Woojae Choi; Younghye Ro; Leegon Hong; Sunmin Ahn; Heejin Kim; Changhyuk Choi; Hakseung Kim; Danil Kim
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 7.  Extensive Sheep and Goat Production: The Role of Novel Technologies towards Sustainability and Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Severiano R Silva; Laura Sacarrão-Birrento; Mariana Almeida; David M Ribeiro; Cristina Guedes; José Ramiro González Montaña; Alfredo F Pereira; Konstantinos Zaralis; Ana Geraldo; Ouranios Tzamaloukas; Marta González Cabrera; Noemí Castro; Anastasio Argüello; Lorenzo E Hernández-Castellano; Ángel J Alonso-Diez; María J Martín; Luis G Cal-Pereyra; George Stilwell; André M de Almeida
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  A Case Study Using Accelerometers to Identify Illness in Ewes following Unintentional Exposure to Mold-Contaminated Feed.

Authors:  Sara C Gurule; Victor V Flores; Kylee K Forrest; Craig A Gifford; John C Wenzel; Colin T Tobin; Derek W Bailey; Jennifer A Hernandez Gifford
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Impact of Observed and Controlled Water Intake on Reticulorumen Temperature in Lactating Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Melissa C Cantor; Joao H C Costa; Jeffrey M Bewley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.