Literature DB >> 21700029

Efficacy of embryo transfer in lactating dairy cows during summer using fresh or vitrified embryos produced in vitro with sex-sorted semen.

B M Stewart1, J Block, P Morelli, A E Navarette, M Amstalden, L Bonilla, P J Hansen, T R Bilby.   

Abstract

The objective was to determine whether transfer of fresh or vitrified embryos produced in vitro with sex-sorted semen improves pregnancy and calving rates during summer in lactating dairy cows compared with artificial insemination (AI). Lactating dairy cows (n=722) were enrolled during summer months at 2 commercial dairies in Central Texas and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: AI with conventional semen (n=227), embryo transfer-vitrified (ET-V; n=279) or embryo transfer-fresh (ET-F; n=216). Embryos were produced in vitro using sex-sorted semen and with Block-Bonilla-Hansen-7 culture medium. For vitrification, grade 1 expanded blastocysts were harvested on d 7 after fertilization and vitrified using the open-pulled straw method. Fresh embryos were grade 1 blastocysts and expanded blastocysts harvested on d 7 after fertilization. Cows were submitted to the Ovsynch56 protocol: d -10 GnRH, d -3 PGF(2α), d -1 GnRH and d 0 timed AI; or Select Synch protocol: d -9 GnRH, d -2 PGF(2α), and AI following detected estrus (day of AI=d 0). On d 7, all cows were examined for presence of a corpus luteum (CL). A vitrified or fresh embryo was transferred to cows with CL in ET-V and ET-F groups. Cows were considered synchronized if progesterone was <1ng/mL on d 0 and a CL was present on d 7. At d 40±7 of gestation, the percentage of cows pregnant was greater for the ET-F compared with the ET-V and AI groups among all cows (42.1 vs. 29.3 and 18.3%, respectively) and synchronized cows (45.5 vs. 31.6 and 24.8%, respectively). Also, the percentage of cows pregnant was greater for the ET-V than the AI group among all cows and tended to be greater among synchronized cows. At d 97±7 of gestation, the percentage of cows pregnant among all cows was greater for ET-F and ET-V groups than for the AI group (36.4 and 25.7 vs. 17.0%, respectively) and the percentage for the ET-F group was greater than for the ET-V group. Among synchronized cows, the percentage of cows pregnant was significantly increased for the ET-F group than for ET-V and AI groups (39.4 vs. 27.8 and 23.1%, respectively) and no difference was found between ET-V and AI groups. No effect of treatment on embryo loss was observed. The percentage of cows with live births was significantly increased for the ET-F than for ET-V and AI groups among all cows (27.5 vs. 17.1 and 14.6%, respectively) and synchronized cows (29.9 vs. 18.5 and 20.0%, respectively). The percentage of cows giving birth to a live heifer was significantly increased for the ET-F and ET-V groups compared with the AI group among all cows (79.1 and 72.5 vs. 50.0%, respectively) and synchronized cows (79.1 and 72.5 vs. 50.0%, respectively). No difference existed between ET-F and ET-V groups for percent live heifer births but both were greater than for the AI group. The transfer of fresh embryos produced in vitro using sex-sorted semen to lactating dairy cows during summer can effectively increase the percentage of cows that establish pregnancy and also the percentage of cows that give birth to a live heifer compared with percentages from AI with conventional semen.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21700029     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-4008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  14 in total

Review 1.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle.

Authors:  Alan D Ealy; Lydia K Wooldridge; Sarah R McCoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Downregulation of gene expression and activity of GRIM-19 affects mouse oocyte viability, maturation, embryo development and implantation.

Authors:  Lan Chao; Xiao Wang; Yang Yang; Wenjuan Cui; Jing Xu; Honglei Chen; Aijun Hao; Xiaohui Deng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Effects of month of breeding on reproductive efficiency of Holstein cows and heifers inseminated with sex-sorted or conventional semen in a hot environment.

Authors:  Miguel Mellado; Edgar Sepulveda; Ulises Macias-Cruz; Leonel Avendaño; Jose E Garcia; Francisco G Veliz; Alvaro Rodríguez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Heat shock decreases the embryonic quality of frozen-thawed bovine blastocysts produced in vitro.

Authors:  Miyuki Mori; Takeshi Hayashi; Yoshihiro Isozaki; Naoki Takenouchi; Miki Sakatani
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 5.  Effects of heat stress on bovine preimplantation embryos produced in vitro.

Authors:  Miki Sakatani
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Artificial insemination of Holstein heifers with sex-sorted semen during the hot season in a subtropical region.

Authors:  Lian-Ben Chang; Chih-Jen Chou; Jia-Shian Shiu; Po-An Tu; Shi-Xuan Gao; Shao-Yu Peng; Shinn-Chih Wu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 7.  Impact of global climate change on livestock health: Bangladesh perspective.

Authors:  Md Zulfekar Ali; Gemma Carlile; Mohammad Giasuddin
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2020-05-14

8.  Reproductive physiology of the heat-stressed dairy cow: implications for fertility and assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Peter J Hansen
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.807

9.  Strategies to increment in vivo and in vitro embryo production and transfer in cattle.

Authors:  Gabriel A Bó; Andrés Cedeño; Reuben J Mapletoft
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 10.  The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle-why aren't pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Peter J Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.