Literature DB >> 21699960

Double-blind, vehicle-controlled randomized twelve-month neurodevelopmental toxicity study of common aluminum salts in the rat.

J Poirier1, H Semple, J Davies, R Lapointe, M Dziwenka, M Hiltz, D Mujibi.   

Abstract

This good laboratory practice (GLP) study of aluminum salts in Sprague-Dawley rats was conducted according to double-blind, vehicle-controlled randomized design by exposing offspring to aluminum citrate in-utero, through lactation, and then in drinking water post-weaning. Three dose levels were used: 30, 100, 300 mg Al/kg bw/day, in addition to control groups that received either water or a sodium citrate solution (27.2 g/L). Endpoints were assessed in both female and male pups: behavioral (motor activity, T-maze, auditory startle, the Functional Observational Battery (FOB) with domains targeting autonomic function, activity, neuromuscular function, sensimotor function, and physiological function), cognitive function (Morris swim maze), brain weight, clinical chemistry, hematology, tissue/blood levels of aluminum and neuropathology. The most notable treatment-related effect observed in the offspring was renal pathology, most prominently in the male pups. Higher mortality and significant morbidity were observed in the male pups in the high Al-citrate dose group; leading to euthanization of this group at day 89. There was evidence for dose-response relationships between neuromuscular measurements-hind-limb and fore-limb grip strength-and Al-treatment in both males and females, although some of the effects may be secondary to body weight changes. No consistent treatment-related effects were observed in ambulatory counts (motor activity) in the different cohorts. No significant effects were observed for the auditory startle response, T-maze tests (pre-weaning day 23 cohort) or the Morris water maze test (day 120 cohort). None of the lesions seen on histopathological examination of brain tissues of the day 364 group was reported as treatment-related and, as these were also seen in the control group, were likely due to aging. In conclusion, these results indicate that concentrations of aluminum in the drinking water that are required to produce minimally detectable neurobiological effects in the rat are about 10,000 times higher than what is typically found in potable drinking water.
Copyright © 2011 IBRO. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21699960     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  8 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of potential health risks posed by pharmaceutical, occupational and consumer exposures to metallic and nanoscale aluminum, aluminum oxides, aluminum hydroxide and its soluble salts.

Authors:  Calvin C Willhite; Nataliya A Karyakina; Robert A Yokel; Nagarajkumar Yenugadhati; Thomas M Wisniewski; Ian M F Arnold; Franco Momoli; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  Cellular transport and homeostasis of essential and nonessential metals.

Authors:  Ebany J Martinez-Finley; Sudipta Chakraborty; Stephanie J B Fretham; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.526

3.  Estimation of daily aluminum intake in Japan based on food consumption inspection results: impact of food additives.

Authors:  Kyoko Sato; Ippei Suzuki; Hiroki Kubota; Noriko Furusho; Tomoyuki Inoue; Yoshikazu Yasukouchi; Hiroshi Akiyama
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a 26 Al Microtracer Approach.

Authors:  Rianne de Ligt; Esther van Duijn; Dimitri Grossouw; Sieto Bosgra; Jacobus Burggraaf; Albert Windhorst; Pierre A M Peeters; Gerrit A van der Luijt; Camilla Alexander-White; Wouter H J Vaes
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Assessment of dermal absorption of aluminium from a representative antiperspirant formulation using a (26Al)Al microtracer approach: a follow-up study in humans.

Authors:  Rianne de Ligt; Joost Westerhout; Dimitri Grossouw; Thomas P Buters; Robert Rissmann; Jacobus Burggraaf; Albert D Windhorst; Sarah Tozer; Gerlinde Pappa; Brian Wall; Dagmar Bury; David R Mason; Wouter H J Vaes
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.680

Review 6.  Is the Aluminum Hypothesis dead?

Authors:  Theodore I Lidsky
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Effects of aluminum on the reduction of neural stem cells, proliferating cells, and differentiating neuroblasts in the dentate gyrus of D-galactose-treated mice via increasing oxidative stress.

Authors:  Sung Min Nam; Jong Whi Kim; Dae Young Yoo; Woosuk Kim; Hyo Young Jung; Jung Hoon Choi; In Koo Hwang; Je Kyung Seong; Yeo Sung Yoon
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Exposure to Alumina Nanoparticles in Female Mice During Pregnancy Induces Neurodevelopmental Toxicity in the Offspring.

Authors:  Qinli Zhang; Yong Ding; Kaihong He; Huan Li; Fuping Gao; Taylor J Moehling; Xiaohong Wu; Jeremy Duncan; Qiao Niu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.