| Literature DB >> 21699692 |
Ching Yong Yick1, Jan H von der Thüsen, Elisabeth H Bel, Peter J Sterk, Peter W Kunst.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Airway remodelling is a feature of asthma including fragmentation of elastic fibres observed in the superficial elastin network of the airway wall. Fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy (FCFM) is a new and non-invasive imaging technique performed during bronchoscopy that may visualize elastic fibres, as shown by in vitro spectral analysis of elastin powder. We hypothesized that FCFM images capture in vivo elastic fibre patterns within the airway wall and that such patterns correspond with airway histology. We aimed to establish the concordance between the bronchial elastic fibre pattern in histology and FCFM. Second, we examined whether elastic fibre patterns in histology and FCFM were different between asthmatic subjects and healthy controls. Finally, the association between these patterns and lung function parameters was investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21699692 PMCID: PMC3146829 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-85
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1FCFM and biopsy during bronchoscopy. The FCFM probe was placed perpendicularly to the surface of the main carina (a) followed by endobronchial biopsy at the same location (b). Figure 1c and 1d gives a lateral view of the probe and biopsy location respectively. * = main carina.
Figure 2Representative histological sections (20 × magnification) and corresponding FCFM images. Fibres were thin and loosely organized in the 'wispy' group (a), whereas these were thick and linearly organized into a layer in the 'lamellar' group (c). No specific pattern was present in the FCFM images of the 'wispy' group (d). Individual thick lines in layer-form were observed in FCFM images of the 'lamellar' group (f). Patterns of the 'mixed' group were a combination of those seen in the 'wispy' and 'lamellar' groups (b, e).
Subject characteristics of asthma (A) and healthy (H) subjects
| A | H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | HA | HNA | ||
| 8 | 8 | 5 | 3 | |
| 2/6 | 4/4 | 2/3 | 2/1 | |
| 24 (2) | 28 (10) | 30 (12) | 23 (2) | |
| 96 (9) | 108 (7) | 105 (7) | 113 (4) | |
| 108 (11) | 115 (6) | 115 (6) | 114 (6) | |
| 6.49 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.07 | |
Total = all healthy control subjects; HA = healthy, atopic; HNA = healthy, non-atopic
a Mean (SD)
b Median (P25-P75)
* A vs. Total p = 0.012; A vs. HNA p = 0.016
** A vs. Total p = 0.001; A vs. HA p = 0.003; A vs. HNA p = 0.014
Figure 3Pattern grading by histology (a) and FCFM (b). A = asthma; Total = all healthy control subjects; HA = healthy, atopic; HNA = healthy, non-atopic. Chi-square test: p > 0.05.
Elastic fibre pattern grading: Paired comparison histology and FCFM
| Subject | Study group | Histology | FCFM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asthma | Wispy | Wispy | |
| Asthma | Wispy | Wispy | |
| Asthma | |||
| Asthma | Mixed | Mixed | |
| Asthma | Lamellar | Lamellar | |
| Asthma | |||
| Asthma | Lamellar | Lamellar | |
| Healthy, atopic | Mixed | Mixed | |
| Healthy, atopic | |||
| Healthy, atopic | Lamellar | Lamellar | |
| Healthy, atopic | Lamellar | Lamellar | |
| Healthy, non-atopic | Wispy | Wispy | |
| Healthy, non-atopic | Mixed | Mixed | |
| Healthy, non-atopic | Lamellar | Lamellar | |
Subjects with discrepancy between pattern scores by histology and FCFM in Italic.
Elastic fibre pattern grading: Agreement histology and FCFM
| Histology | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wispy | Mixed | Lamellar | ||
| Wispy | 3 | - | - | |
| Mixed | - | 3 | 1 | |
| Lamellar | - | 2 | 5 | |
κw (SE, 95% CI) = 0.744 (0.145, 0.46-1)
Figure 4Post-bronchodilator FEV. Data presented as post-bronchodilator FEV1 %predicted of individual subjects and the mean per classification score. ● = asthma, ■ = healthy.