RATIONALE: Our understanding of how airway remodeling affects regional airway elastic properties is limited due to technical difficulties in quantitatively measuring dynamic, in vivo airway dimensions. Such knowledge could help elucidate mechanisms of excessive airway narrowing. OBJECTIVES: To use anatomical optical coherence tomography (aOCT) to compare central airway elastic properties in control subjects and those with obstructive lung diseases. METHODS: After bronchodilation, airway lumen area (Ai) was measured using aOCT during bronchoscopy in control subjects (n = 10) and those with asthma (n = 16), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 9), and bronchiectasis (n = 8). Ai was measured in each of generations 0 to 5 while airway pressure was increased from -10 to 20 cm H(2)O. Airway compliance (Caw) and specific compliance (sCaw) were derived from the transpulmonary pressure (Pl) versus Ai curves. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Caw decreased progressively as airway generation increased, but sCaw did not differ appreciably across the generations. In subjects with asthma and bronchiectasis, Caw and sCaw were similar to control subjects and the Pl-Ai curves were left-shifted. No significant differences were observed between control and COPD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal airway elastic properties are altered in obstructive lung diseases. Although central airway compliance does not differ from control subjects in asthma, bronchiectasis, or COPD, Ai is lower in asthma and the Pl-Ai relationship is left-shifted in both asthma and bronchiectasis, suggesting that airways are maximally distended at lower inflating pressures. Such changes reflect alteration in the balance between airway wall distensibility and radial traction exerted on airways by surrounding lung parenchyma favoring airway narrowing. Clinical trial registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12607000624482).
RATIONALE: Our understanding of how airway remodeling affects regional airway elastic properties is limited due to technical difficulties in quantitatively measuring dynamic, in vivo airway dimensions. Such knowledge could help elucidate mechanisms of excessive airway narrowing. OBJECTIVES: To use anatomical optical coherence tomography (aOCT) to compare central airway elastic properties in control subjects and those with obstructive lung diseases. METHODS: After bronchodilation, airway lumen area (Ai) was measured using aOCT during bronchoscopy in control subjects (n = 10) and those with asthma (n = 16), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 9), and bronchiectasis (n = 8). Ai was measured in each of generations 0 to 5 while airway pressure was increased from -10 to 20 cm H(2)O. Airway compliance (Caw) and specific compliance (sCaw) were derived from the transpulmonary pressure (Pl) versus Ai curves. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Caw decreased progressively as airway generation increased, but sCaw did not differ appreciably across the generations. In subjects with asthma and bronchiectasis, Caw and sCaw were similar to control subjects and the Pl-Ai curves were left-shifted. No significant differences were observed between control and COPD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal airway elastic properties are altered in obstructive lung diseases. Although central airway compliance does not differ from control subjects in asthma, bronchiectasis, or COPD, Ai is lower in asthma and the Pl-Ai relationship is left-shifted in both asthma and bronchiectasis, suggesting that airways are maximally distended at lower inflating pressures. Such changes reflect alteration in the balance between airway wall distensibility and radial traction exerted on airways by surrounding lung parenchyma favoring airway narrowing. Clinical trial registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12607000624482).
Authors: Claire Robertson; Sang-Won Lee; Yeh-Chan Ahn; Sari Mahon; Zhongping Chen; Matthew Brenner; Steven C George Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Miranda Kirby; Keishi Ohtani; Taylor Nickens; Rosa Maria Lopez Lisbona; Anthony M D Lee; Tawimas Shaipanich; Pierre Lane; Calum MacAulay; Stephen Lam; Harvey O Coxson Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Alex M Pagnozzi; Rodney W Kirk; Brendan F Kennedy; David D Sampson; Robert A McLaughlin Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Sumit Gupta; Ruth Hartley; Amisha Singapuri; Beverly Hargadon; William Monteiro; Ian D Pavord; Ana R Sousa; Richard P Marshall; Deepak Subramanian; David Parr; James J Entwisle; Salman Siddiqui; Vimal Raj; Christopher E Brightling Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Abhaya Trivedi; Chase Hall; Eric A Hoffman; Jason C Woods; David S Gierada; Mario Castro Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 10.793