Making renal stones change size-impact of CT image post processing and reader variability.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to quantify the impact of image post-processing parameters on the apparent renal stone size, and to quantify the intra- and inter-reader variability in renal stone size estimation.
METHODS: Fifty CT datasets including a renal or ureteral stone were included retrospectively during a prospective inclusion period. Each of the CT datasets was post-processed in different ways regarding slice thickness, slice increment and window setting. In the first part of the study a single reader repeated size estimations for the renal stones using different post-processing parameters. In the intra-reader variability experiment one reader reported size estimations for the same images with a one-week interval. The inter-reader variability data were obtained from 11 readers reporting size estimations for the same renal stones.
RESULTS: The apparent stone size differed according to image post-processing parameters with the largest mean differences seen with regard to the window settings experiment (1.5 mm, p < 0.001) and slice thickness (0.8 mm, p < 0.001). Changes in parameters introduced a bias and a pseudo-random variability. The inter-reader variability was considerably larger than the intra-reader variability.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a need for the standardisation of making measurements on CT images.