Literature DB >> 21698420

Surgical margin status of specimen and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 400 procedures.

Francesco Porpiglia1, Cristian Fiori, Matteo Manfredi, Susanna Grande, Massimiliano Poggio, Enrico Bollito, Mauro Papotti, Roberto Mario Scarpa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse the surgical margins status of prostatic glands, resected by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for prostate cancer, and to correlate it with biochemical free survival rate (BFSR).
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 405 patients undergoing LRP from 2000 to 2009 at a single institution. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy were excluded from the study. Three hundred patients matched all the criteria: 232 of these had negative surgical margins (NSM) and 68 positive surgical margins (PSM). The median follow-up was 62 months. PSM were classified based on the following: (a) the number of margins, monofocal and multifocal, (b) the location, apical or non-apical and (c) the extension, ≤2.8 mm or >2.8 mm. These data were then entered into a multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Overall BFSR rate was 67.6% in PSM group and 88.8% in NSM group (P < 0.001). We registered a HR of 3.78 in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). In terms of the extension, BFSR in univariate survival analysis was 77.8% in ≤2.8 mm PSM and 38.9% in >2.8 mm PSM (P = 0.003), with a HR of 5.68 (P = 0.011) in multivariate analysis. BFSR was 59% for apical margins and 77% for non-apical margins (P = 0.038). In monofocal margins, BFSR was 73%, while 53% in multifocal (P = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend careful evaluation of patients with PSM following LRP, especially if they are more than 2.8 mm, and in these cases, adjuvant therapy should be considered after radical surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698420     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0711-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  18 in total

1.  The length of positive surgical margins correlates with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Inge M van Oort; H Maxim Bruins; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Ben C Knipscheer; J Alfred Witjes; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Ilias Cagiannos; Phillip D Stricker; Eric Klein; Thomas Cangiano; Fritz H Schröder; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Carlo Terrone; Roberto Tarabuzzi; Michele Billia; Susanna Grande; Francesca Musso; Rodolfo Burruni; Julien Renard; Roberto Mario Scarpa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Theodorus Kwast
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  R J Babaian; P Troncoso; V A Bhadkamkar; D A Johnston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M L Blute; D G Bostwick; E J Bergstralh; J M Slezak; S K Martin; C L Amling; H Zincke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Peter Swindle; James A Eastham; Makoto Ohori; Michael W Kattan; Thomas Wheeler; Norio Maru; Kevin Slawin; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Bruce L Dalkin; Lawrence D True; William J Ellis; Janet L Stanford; Paul H Lange; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  T Fesseha; W Sakr; D Grignon; M Banerjee; D P Wood; J E Pontes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yakup Kordan; Shady Salem; Sam S Chang; Peter E Clark; Michael S Cookson; Rodney Davis; S Duke Herrell; Roxelyn Baumgartner; Sharon Phillips; Joseph A Smith; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team's experience on 1,600 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Paolo Verze; Salvatore Scuzzarella; Giorgio R Martina; Pierluigi Giummelli; Federico Cantoni; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Sarah J Drouin; Julie Rode; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Zhenpeng Lian; Hongtuan Zhang; Zhaowei He; Shenfei Ma; Xiaoming Wang; Ranlu Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.754

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.