Literature DB >> 20459553

The length of positive surgical margins correlates with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Inge M van Oort1, H Maxim Bruins, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Ben C Knipscheer, J Alfred Witjes, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic role of the length of a positive surgical margin (+SM) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostatic cancer. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive RP specimens (n = 267) with +SM were analysed. All RP specimens were sectioned at 4-mm intervals and completely embedded. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and proportional hazards models. In 267 patients the length of +SM ranged from 0.4 to 174.5 mm (median 11.2 mm) and correlated with preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) (P < 0.001), pathological stage (P < 0.001), tumour volume (P = 0.001), number of +SM (P < 0.001), Gleason grade at +SM (P < 0.001) and Gleason score (P = 0.015). Patients with detectable postoperative PSA levels (n = 34) or adjuvant therapy (n = 59) were excluded from BCR analysis. In the remaining 174 patients the 5-year risk of BCR was 29%; in patients with +SM <or=10 mm and >10 mm this was 21% and 39%, respectively. On multivariable analysis BCR was associated with an increasing length of +SM (<or=10 mm versus >10 mm; hazard ratio 2.15; 95% confidence interval 1.12, 4.15; P = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: The length of +SM is an independent prognostic factor for BCR in patients with undetectable PSA after RP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20459553     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03497.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  9 in total

1.  Surgical margin status of specimen and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 400 procedures.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Cristian Fiori; Matteo Manfredi; Susanna Grande; Massimiliano Poggio; Enrico Bollito; Mauro Papotti; Roberto Mario Scarpa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Heather J Chalfin; Michael Dinizo; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Elizabeth Humphreys; Misop Han
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative histopathologic microvascular parameters in organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cornelis G van Niekerk; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Thomas Hambrock; Henk-Jan Huisman; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE).

Authors:  Margaretha A van der Slot; Michael A den Bakker; Sjoerd Klaver; Mike Kliffen; Martijn B Busstra; John B W Rietbergen; Melanie Gan; Karen E Hamoen; Leo M Budel; Natascha N T Goemaere; Chris H Bangma; Jozien Helleman; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  A Recursive Partitioning Analysis Demonstrating Risk Subsets for 8-Year Biochemical Relapse After Margin-Positive Radical Prostatectomy Without Adjuvant Hormone or Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Steven N Seyedin; John M Watkins; Zachary Mayo; Anthony N Snow; Michael Laszewski; J Kyle Russo; Sarah L Mott; Chad R Tracy; Mark C Smith; John M Buatti; Joseph M Caster
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-14

7.  Clinical utility of subclassifying positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Emily A Vertosick; Kazuma Udo; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; S Joseph Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 5.969

8.  Clinical significance of surgical margin status in patients subjected to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jakub Dobruch; Lukasz Nyk; Michał Skrzypczyk; Piotr Chłosta; Tomasz Dzik; Andrzej Borówka
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-12-11

9.  High b value (2,000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1,000 s/mm2 for tumor conspicuity and discrimination of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Naoki Kanomata; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Yoshiyuki Miyaji; Hiroki Higashi; Akira Yamamoto; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.