Literature DB >> 21698360

Predicting regional space-time variation of PM2.5 with land-use regression model and MODIS data.

Liang Mao1, Youliang Qiu, Claudia Kusano, Xiaohui Xu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Existing land-use regression (LUR) models use land use/cover, population, and traffic information to predict long-term intra-urban variation of air pollution. These models are limited to explaining spatial variation of air pollutants, and few of them are capable of addressing temporal variability. This article proposes a space-time LUR model at a regional scale by incorporating aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS).
METHODS: A multivariate regression model was established to predict the distribution of particle matters less than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM(2.5)) in Florida, USA. Monthly PM(2.5) averages at 34 monitoring sites in the year 2005 were used as the dependent variable, while independent variables include land-use patterns, population, traffic, and topographic characteristics. In addition, a monthly AOD variable derived from the MODIS data was integrated into the regression as a space-time predictor. Cross-validation procedures were conducted to validate this AOD-enhanced LUR model.
RESULTS: The final regression model yields a coefficient of determination (R (2)) of 0.63, which is comparable to other studies that employ aerodynamic/meteorological models. The cross validation indicated a good agreement between the observed and predicted PM(2.5) with a mean residual of 0.02 μg/m(3). The distance to heavy-traffic roads is negatively associated with the concentrations of PM(2.5), while agricultural land use is positively correlated. PM(2.5) tends to concentrate in high-latitude areas of Florida and during summer/fall seasons. The monthly AOD has a significant contribution to explaining the variation of PM(2.5) and remarkably enhances the model performance.
CONCLUSIONS: This research is the first attempt to improve current LUR models by integrating remote sensing technologies. The integrative model approach offers an effective means to estimate air pollution over time and space, and could be an alternative to the classic meteorological approach. The model results would provide adequate measurements for epidemiological studies, particularly for chronic health effects in large populations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698360     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0546-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  20 in total

1.  Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK.

Authors:  H S Adams; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; R N Colvile; M A McMullen; P Khandelwal
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers.

Authors:  Mei Zheng; Glen R Cass; James J Schauer; Eric S Edgerton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  A review of land-use regression models for characterizing intraurban air pollution exposure.

Authors:  Patrick H Ryan; Grace K LeMasters
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  A land use regression model for predicting ambient fine particulate matter across Los Angeles, CA.

Authors:  D K Moore; M Jerrett; W J Mack; N Künzli
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2007-01-19

5.  What can affect AOD-PM(2.5) association?

Authors:  Naresh Kumar
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: have we reached the promised land?

Authors:  Raymond M Hoff; Sundar A Christopher
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Fine particulate air pollution and its components in association with cause-specific emergency admissions.

Authors:  Antonella Zanobetti; Meredith Franklin; Petros Koutrakis; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Fine particulate air pollution and all-cause mortality within the Harvard Six-Cities Study: variations in risk by period of exposure.

Authors:  Paul J Villeneuve; Mark S Goldberg; Daniel Krewski; Richard T Burnett; Yue Chen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Ambient air pollution and birth weight in full-term infants in Atlanta, 1994-2004.

Authors:  Lyndsey A Darrow; Mitchel Klein; Matthew J Strickland; James A Mulholland; Paige E Tolbert
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  A semiparametric statistical approach for forecasting SO₂ and NOx concentrations.

Authors:  Hongwei Lu; Yimei Zhang; Xiahui Wang; Li He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Spatial modeling of PM2.5 concentrations with a multifactoral radial basis function neural network.

Authors:  Bin Zou; Min Wang; Neng Wan; J Gaines Wilson; Xin Fang; Yuqi Tang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Integrating ecosystem services in terrestrial conservation planning.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Yuan; Shang-Lien Lo; Chih-Kai Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Performance comparison of LUR and OK in PM2.5 concentration mapping: a multidimensional perspective.

Authors:  Bin Zou; Yanqing Luo; Neng Wan; Zhong Zheng; Troy Sternberg; Yilan Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Spatio-temporal variation of PM2.5 concentrations and their relationship with geographic and socioeconomic factors in China.

Authors:  Gang Lin; Jingying Fu; Dong Jiang; Wensheng Hu; Donglin Dong; Yaohuan Huang; Mingdong Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.