| Literature DB >> 21696581 |
Amon Exavery1, Angelina M Lutambi, Godfrey M Mubyazi, Khadija Kweka, Godfrey Mbaruku, Honorati Masanja.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although some studies in Tanzania have addressed the question of sexuality and STIs among adolescents, mostly those aged 15 - 19 years, evidence on how multiple sexual partners influence condom use among 10 - 19 year-olds is limited. This study attempts to bridge this gap by testing a hypothesis that sexual relationships with multiple partners in the age group 10 - 19 years spurs condom use during sex in four districts in Tanzania.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21696581 PMCID: PMC3141458 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Demographic characteristics of the study sample, 2008. (N = 612)
| Variable | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Female | 330 (53.9%) |
| Male | 282 (46.1%) |
| 10 - 14 | 305 (49.8%) |
| 15 - 19 | 307 (50.2%) |
| Kigoma | 107 (17.5%) |
| Kilombero | 131 (21.4%) |
| Rufiji | 176 (28.8%) |
| Ulanga | 198 (32.3%) |
n = Number of respondents for variable category
Figure 1Percentage distribution of adolescent's age group and sex by district of residence in Tanzania, 2008 (N = 612).
Figure 2Percentage distribution of 143 sexually active adolescents by age group and sex in four districts in Tanzania, 2008.
Figure 3Prevalence of condom use at the last sexual intercourse among 143 sexually active adolescents by district of residence in Tanzania, 2008.
Distribution of factors associated with condom use at the last sexual intercourse among 143 sexually active adolescents in four districts in Tanzania, 2008.
| Variable | Condom use at last sex | P-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| YES | NO | ||
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| 0.863 | |||
| No | 33 (39.8%) | 50 (60.2%) | |
| Yes | 23 (38.3%) | 37 (61.7%) | |
| 0.658 | |||
| Female | 33 (40.7%) | 48 (59.3%) | |
| Male | 23 (37.1%) | 39 (62.9%) | |
| 10 - 14 | 5 (17.9%) | 23 (82.1%) | |
| 15 - 19 | 51 (44.4%) | 64 (55.6%) | |
| Kigoma | 7 (46.7%) | 8 (53.3%) | |
| Kilombero | 22 (56.4%) | 17 (43.6%) | |
| Rufiji | 6 (14.0%) | 37 (86.0%) | |
| Ulanga | 21 (45.7%) | 25 (54.4%) | |
| No | 2 (14.3%) | 12 (85.7%) | |
| Yes | 54 (41.9%) | 75 (58.1%) | |
| No | 3 (16.7%) | 15 (83.3%) | |
| Yes | 53 (42.4%) | 72 (57.6%) | |
* Based on Pearson Chi-Square test
** Fisher's exact test for a contingency table with an expected cell count of < 5
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between multiple sexual partners and condom use at the last sexual intercourse among 143 sexually active adolescents in four districts in Tanzania, 2008.
| Variable | n | Condom use at last sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| No | 83 | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 60 | 0.77 | (0.35 - 1.67) | 0.504 |
| 10 - 14 | 28 | Ref. | ||
| 15 - 19 | 115 | 3.69 | (1.21 - 11.25) | |
| Rufiji | 43 | Ref. | ||
| Kigoma | 15 | 7.45 | (1.79 - 31.06) | |
| Kilombero | 39 | 8.89 | (2.91 - 27.21) | |
| Ulanga | 46 | 5.88 | (2.00 - 17.31) | |
| No | 14 | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 129 | 4.00 | (0.79 - 20.29) | 0.095 |
n = Number of respondents for variable category; OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence interval; Ref. = Reference category.
The influence of multiple sexual partners on condom use is adjusted for age, district of residence and whether or not one can obtain a condom if he/she wants. Factors that do not appear in this table (regardless of their significance level in the test of associations in table 2) presented immaterial effect on condom use and this remained impervious when the log likelihood ratio test was used. Since this was somewhat a small sample, the log likelihood ratio test was used to select variables for the multivariate model (rather than relying on the P < 0.2 criterion), except multiple sexual partnerships which was the exposure variable of interest.
Additional multivariate logistic regression analysis restricted to 115 sexually active older adolescents (15 - 19 years) of the association between multiple sexual partners and condom use at the last sexual intercourse in four districts in Tanzania, 2008.
| Variable | n | Condom use at last sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| No | 64 | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 51 | 0.68 | (0.30 - 1.57) | 0.369 |
| Rufiji | 34 | Ref. | ||
| Kigoma | 11 | 9.21 | (1.97 - 42.98) | |
| Kilombero | 33 | 8.35 | (2.58 - 27.09) | |
| Ulanga | 37 | 5.03 | (1.63 - 15.46) | |
| No | 8 | Ref | ||
| Yes | 107 | 3.02 | (0.54 - 16.81) | 0.206 |
n = Number of respondents for variable category; OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence interval; Ref. = Reference category.