Literature DB >> 21695633

Introduction to fragment-based drug discovery.

Daniel A Erlanson1.   

Abstract

Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) has emerged in the past decade as a powerful tool for discovering drug leads. The approach first identifies starting points: very small molecules (fragments) that are about half the size of typical drugs. These fragments are then expanded or linked together to generate drug leads. Although the origins of the technique date back some 30 years, it was only in the mid-1990s that experimental techniques became sufficiently sensitive and rapid for the concept to be become practical. Since that time, the field has exploded: FBDD has played a role in discovery of at least 18 drugs that have entered the clinic, and practitioners of FBDD can be found throughout the world in both academia and industry. Literally dozens of reviews have been published on various aspects of FBDD or on the field as a whole, as have three books (Jahnke and Erlanson, Fragment-based approaches in drug discovery, 2006; Zartler and Shapiro, Fragment-based drug discovery: a practical approach, 2008; Kuo, Fragment based drug design: tools, practical approaches, and examples, 2011). However, this chapter will assume that the reader is approaching the field with little prior knowledge. It will introduce some of the key concepts, set the stage for the chapters to follow, and demonstrate how X-ray crystallography plays a central role in fragment identification and advancement.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21695633     DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Curr Chem        ISSN: 0340-1022


  68 in total

Review 1.  Evolutions in fragment-based drug design: the deconstruction-reconstruction approach.

Authors:  Haijun Chen; Xiaobin Zhou; Ailan Wang; Yunquan Zheng; Yu Gao; Jia Zhou
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Stefan Jehle; Sefan Jehle; Lingqi Luo; Stefan O Ochiana; Elizabeth V Jones; Michael Pollastri; Karen N Allen; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fragment Screening by NMR.

Authors:  Ben J Davis
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 4.  Oncogenic protein interfaces: small molecules, big challenges.

Authors:  Tracy L Nero; Craig J Morton; Jessica K Holien; Jerome Wielens; Michael W Parker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Ligand efficiency metrics considered harmful.

Authors:  Peter W Kenny; Andrei Leitão; Carlos A Montanari
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 7.  Past strategies and future directions for identifying AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) modulators.

Authors:  Sarah E Sinnett; Jay E Brenman
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Sub-nanomolar detection of prostate-specific membrane antigen in synthetic urine by synergistic, dual-ligand phage.

Authors:  Kritika Mohan; Keith C Donavan; Jessica A Arter; Reginald M Penner; Gregory A Weiss
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Therapeutic approaches to preventing cell death in Huntington disease.

Authors:  Anna Kaplan; Brent R Stockwell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by NMR Guided Identification of Novel Agents Targeting the Protein Docking Domain of YopH.

Authors:  Angel Bottini; Bainan Wu; Elisa Barile; Surya K De; Marilisa Leone; Maurizio Pellecchia
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.