Literature DB >> 21695575

Patient-to-patient variability in autologous pericardial matrix scaffolds for cardiac repair.

Sonya B Seif-Naraghi1, Dinah Horn, Pam A Schup-Magoffin, Michael M Madani, Karen L Christman.   

Abstract

The pursuit of alternate therapies for end-stage heart failure post-myocardial infarction has led to the development of a variety of in situ gelling materials to be used as cellular or acellular scaffolds for cardiac repair. Previously, a protocol was established to decellularize human and porcine pericardia and process the extracellular matrix (ECM) into an injectable form. The resulting gels were found to retain components of the native extracellular matrix; cell infiltration was facilitated in vivo, and neovascularization was observed by 2 weeks. However, the assertion that an injectable form of human pericardial tissue could be a potentially autologous scaffold for myocardial tissue engineering requires assessment of the patient-to-patient variability. With this work, seven human pericardia from a relevant patient demographic are processed into injectable matrix materials that gel when brought to physiologic conditions. The resulting materials are compared with respect to their protein composition, glycosaminoglycan content, in vitro degradation, in vivo gelation, and microstructure. It is observed that a diminished collagen content in a subset of samples prevents in vitro gelation but not in vivo gelation at lower ECM concentrations. The structure is similarly fibrous and porous across all samples, implying the cell infiltration may be similarly facilitated. The biochemical composition as characterized by tandem mass spectrometry is comparable; basic ECM components are conserved across all samples, and the presence of a wide variety of ECM proteins and glycoproteins demonstrate the retention of biochemical complexity post-processing. It is concluded that the variability within human pericardial tissue specimens does not prevent them from being processed into injectable scaffolds; therefore, pericardial tissue offers a promising source as an autologous, injectable biomaterial scaffold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21695575      PMCID: PMC3280922          DOI: 10.1007/s12265-011-9293-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  69 in total

Review 1.  Pericardial fluid as a new material for clinical heart research.

Authors:  M Fujita; M Komeda; K Hasegawa; Y Kihara; R Nohara; S Sasayama
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Theoretical impact of the injection of material into the myocardium: a finite element model simulation.

Authors:  Samuel T Wall; Joseph C Walker; Kevin E Healy; Mark B Ratcliffe; Julius M Guccione
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Informed consent: cultural and religious issues associated with the use of allogeneic and xenogeneic mesh products.

Authors:  Eric D Jenkins; Michael Yip; Lora Melman; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Injectable hydrogel scaffold from decellularized human lipoaspirate.

Authors:  D Adam Young; Dina O Ibrahim; Diane Hu; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Development and characterization of an acellular human pericardial matrix for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Saeed Mirsadraee; Helen E Wilcox; Sotiris A Korossis; John N Kearney; Kevin G Watterson; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-04

7.  The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation.

Authors:  Gregory T Christopherson; Hongjun Song; Hai-Quan Mao
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Activity/stability of human pepsin: implications for reflux attributed laryngeal disease.

Authors:  Nikki Johnston; Peter W Dettmar; Bimjhana Bishwokarma; Mark O Lively; Jamie A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  The influence of fibrous elastomer structure and porosity on matrix organization.

Authors:  Jamie L Ifkovits; Katherine Wu; Robert L Mauck; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Structure and expression of fibulin-2, a novel extracellular matrix protein with multiple EGF-like repeats and consensus motifs for calcium binding.

Authors:  T C Pan; T Sasaki; R Z Zhang; R Fässler; R Timpl; M L Chu
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  14 in total

1.  Quantification of decellularized human myocardial matrix: A comparison of six patients.

Authors:  Todd D Johnson; Ryan C Hill; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Vishal Nigam; Atta Behfar; Karen L Christman; Kirk C Hansen
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function.

Authors:  Lindsey T Saldin; Madeline C Cramer; Sachin S Velankar; Lisa J White; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Materials for Cardiac Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Donald Bejleri; Michael E Davis
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 4.  Concise review: injectable biomaterials for the treatment of myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease: translational challenges and progress.

Authors:  Jessica L Ungerleider; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development.

Authors:  Martin T Spang; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Injectable extracellular matrix derived hydrogel provides a platform for enhanced retention and delivery of a heparin-binding growth factor.

Authors:  Sonya B Seif-Naraghi; Dinah Horn; Pamela J Schup-Magoffin; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Bidirectional relationship between cardiac extracellular matrix and cardiac cells in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Hyun-Ji Park; Kenneth J De Jesus Morales; Sruti Bheri; Brandon P Kassouf; Michael E Davis
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 8.  Electroconductive biomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hamid Esmaeili; Alejandra Patino-Guerrero; Masoud Hasany; Mohammad Omaish Ansari; Adnan Memic; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz; Mehdi Nikkhah
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Oxime cross-linked injectable hydrogels for catheter delivery.

Authors:  Gregory N Grover; Rebecca L Braden; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Cellularized microcarriers as adhesive building blocks for fabrication of tubular tissue constructs.

Authors:  Waleed O Twal; Sandra C Klatt; Keerthi Harikrishnan; Ebtesam Gerges; Marion A Cooley; Thomas C Trusk; Boran Zhou; Mohamed G Gabr; Tarek Shazly; Susan M Lessner; Roger R Markwald; W Scott Argraves
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.