Literature DB >> 20700783

[Efficiency, risks, and advantages of using robotic support systems in interventional medicine].

H Feussner1, S Can, A Fiolka, A Schneider, D Wilhelm.   

Abstract

During the past decade, robotic systems were evaluated for the first time in practically all surgical disciplines. With only a few exceptions (radical prostatectomy), mechatronic systems did not achieve a breakthrough in any field of application. Second generation robotic devices with better integration of complementary technologies (preoperative therapy planning, intraoperative diagnostic work-up, navigation, etc.) and augmented functionality are now ready to be introduced into clinical practice. It is hoped that the specific advantages of robotics will result in increased use compared to previous systems. Robotics is a key technology if new surgical strategies ("scarless surgery") are to succeed.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700783     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-010-1095-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  2 in total

1.  [Robotic medicine in Germany: quo vadis?].

Authors:  S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Stone treatment tomorrow and the day after].

Authors:  A Miernik; S Hein; F Adams; J Halbritter; M Schoenthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.