Literature DB >> 21695383

Cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery in Japan.

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery through measurement of the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in Japan.
METHODS: A total of 549 patients scheduled for cataract surgery at 12 clinical sites from November 2008 through February 2010 were included in the study. Prospective assessment of patient preference-based quality of life (utility) was performed before and after the surgery using the time tradeoff method, EuroQol, and Health Utilities Index Mark 3. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between utility and visual acuity. The QALYs gained through cataract surgery were estimated, and cost-utility analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The utilities significantly correlated with the visual acuity in the better seeing eye. In all the subgroups (first eye surgery, second eye surgery, and bilateral surgery), mean utility improvement was statistically significant. Average QALYs for unilateral cataract surgery and bilateral cataract surgery were 2.40 and 3.40, respectively. The cost per QALY gained from surgery was estimated at ¥122,472 (US $1,307) for unilateral surgery and ¥145,562 (US $1,553) for bilateral surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine cataract surgery in Japan is highly cost-effective. Factors that contribute to this are the high clinical effectiveness of the surgery, the substantial improvement in patient-perceived quality of life, and the reasonable cost of the surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21695383     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-011-0041-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  27 in total

1.  Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients.

Authors:  S Sharma; G C Brown; M M Brown; H Hollands; R Robins; G K Shah
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparative effectiveness and health care spending.

Authors:  Robert C Kane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Relevance of cost-effectiveness analysis to clinicians and policy makers.

Authors:  Allan S Detsky; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Three year prospective, randomized evaluation of intraocular lens implantation through 3.2 and 5.5 mm incisions.

Authors:  T Oshika; K Nagahara; S Yaguchi; K Emi; H Takenaka; S Tsuboi; F Yoshitomi; T Nagamoto; D Kurosaka
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Prevalence of visual impairment in the adult Japanese population by cause and severity and future projections.

Authors:  Masakazu Yamada; Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Chris B Roberts; M Lynne Pezzullo; Katie Yates; Shigeru Takano; Kensaku Miyake; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.648

Review 6.  Valuing health States for use in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John Brazier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Is cataract surgery cost-effective among older patients with a low predicted probability for improvement in reported visual functioning?

Authors:  Arash Naeim; Emmett B Keeler; Peter R Gutierrez; M Roy Wilson; David Reuben; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.

Authors:  Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Daniel Etya'ale; Ivo Kocur; Ramachandra Pararajasegaram; Gopal P Pokharel; Silvio P Mariotti
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 9.  Health utility values associated with diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  A Lloyd; B Nafees; S Gavriel; M D Rousculp; K S Boye; A Ahmad
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

Authors:  Dennis G Fryback; Nancy Cross Dunham; Mari Palta; Janel Hanmer; Jennifer Buechner; Dasha Cherepanov; Shani A Herrington; Ron D Hays; Robert M Kaplan; Theodore G Ganiats; David Feeny; Paul Kind
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  13 in total

1.  The cost-effectiveness of second-eye cataract surgery in the UK.

Authors:  Keith Cooper; Jonathan Shepherd; Geoff Frampton; Petra Harris; Andrew Lotery
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' Cataract Surgery Commissioning Guidance: executive summary.

Authors:  A C Day; R Wormald; S Coronini-Cronberg; R Smith
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Effects of phacoemulsification with versus without viscoelastic devices on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  İbrahim Taşkın; Lokman Aslan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  Immediate sequential bilateral surgery versus delayed sequential bilateral surgery for cataracts.

Authors:  Mor M Dickman; Lindsay S Spekreijse; Bjorn Winkens; Johannes Sag Schouten; Rob Wp Simons; Carmen D Dirksen; Rudy Mma Nuijts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in Japan: a probabilistic Markov modeling study.

Authors:  Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Masakazu Yamada; Yoko Akune; Akira Murakami; Annabelle A Okada; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Yuichi Ohashi; Naoya Yamagishi; Hiroshi Tamura; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tomoyuki Takura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  The association between legal Japanese visual impairment grades and vision-related quality of life.

Authors:  Motoko Kawashima; Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Tadashi Nakano; Hiroshi Tamura; Koichi Ono; Akira Murakami; Sachiko Inoue; Kazuo Tsubota; Masakazu Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Assessment of vision-related quality of life among patients with cataracts and the outcomes of cataract surgery using a newly developed visual function questionnaire: the VFQ-J11.

Authors:  Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Masakazu Yamada; Yoko Akune; Akira Murakami; Annabelle A Okada; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Yuichi Ohashi; Naoya Yamagishi; Hiroshi Tamura; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tomoyuki Takura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 8.  Immediate versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Yufeng Nancy Chen; Sangita Patel; Angela Pui-Kei Leung; Man Mohan Merchea; William G Hodge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Visual impairment as a function of visual acuity in both eyes and its impact on patient reported preferences.

Authors:  Robert P Finger; Eva Fenwick; Christoph W Hirneiss; Arthur Hsueh; Robyn H Guymer; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Jill E Keeffe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of physical inactivity and locomotor dysfunction in adults with visual impairment.

Authors:  Sachiko Inoue; Motoko Kawashima; Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Tadashi Nakano; Hiroshi Tamura; Koichi Ono; Akira Murakami; Kazuo Tsubota; Masakazu Yamada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.