| Literature DB >> 21693048 |
Paloma Encinas1, Silvia Gomez-Sebastian, Maria Carmen Nunez, Eduardo Gomez-Casado, Jose M Escribano, Amparo Estepa, Julio Coll.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are currently no purification methods capable of producing the large amounts of fish rhabdoviral glycoprotein G (gpG) required for diagnosis and immunisation purposes or for studying structure and molecular mechanisms of action of this molecule (ie. pH-dependent membrane fusion). As a result of the unavailability of large amounts of the gpG from viral haemorrhagic septicaemia rhabdovirus (VHSV), one of the most dangerous viruses affecting cultured salmonid species, research interests in this field are severely hampered. Previous purification methods to obtain recombinant gpG from VHSV in E. coli, yeast and baculovirus grown in insect cells have not produced soluble conformations or acceptable yields. The development of large-scale purification methods for gpGs will also further research into other fish rhabdoviruses, such as infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV), spring carp viremia virus (SVCV), hirame rhabdovirus (HIRRV) and snakehead rhabdovirus (SHRV).Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21693048 PMCID: PMC3148207 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Figure 1Recognition of extract proteins from . Larvae were collected 72 hours after infection with the recombinant baculoviruses. Larvae were homogenized in guanidinium-free buffer and their soluble proteins were extracted. Thirty μg of protein extracts was loaded and electrophoresed in the same 12% polyacrylamide gel (PAGE) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was then cut and reacted with anti-His MAb (lanes A, B, C and D) or with anti-gpG MAb mix (lanes E, F, G and H) and peroxidase labelled anti-mouse Ig and then detected by chemiluminiscence. Some of the molecular weight markers on KDa are shown by the arrow numbers to the left and to the right.
Figure 2Ni-affinity chromatography fractions of protein extracts from . Fifty recombinant baculovirus-infected larvae (~10 g) were homogenized in 6 M guanidinimun chloride, 1 M sodium chloride in 40 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.8 containing 25 mM imidazole. They were then disrupted by sonication and centrifuged until a clear lysate was obtained. A 3-ml Probond (Invitrogen) bed column was used to retain the polyhistidine-tagged recombinant proteins. Bound proteins were eluted using the same buffer with 250 mM imidazole. ●, protein extract from larvae infected with the G21-465 recombinant baculovirus. ■, protein extract from larvae infected with the G21-507 recombinant baculovirus. *, protein extract from larvae infected with the BacNi baculovirus. Fractions with an absorbance > 0.3 at 280 nm were pooled and electrophoresed in a 4 to 20% polyacrylamide gel. Results of G21-465 stained with Coomassie-blue are shown in the insert.
Figure 3Recognition of solid-phase G21-465 by anti-gpG MAbs and VHSV-hyperimmunized trout sera (hTS). Plates were coated with 1 μg per well of insect-derived G21-465 untreated (- ß) or treated with ß-mercaptoethanol (+ ß), as indicated in the text. Hyperimmunized trout sera (hTS) were obtained by intraperitoneal injections of purified VHSV and diluted 2000-fold. The MAb 2C9 was an anti-VHSV nucleocapsid N-MAb used as a negative control [29]. MAbs were used at 2.5 μg per well. Open bars, ELISA performed with dilution buffer adjusted to pH 6.7. Black bars, ELISA performed with dilution buffer adjusted to pH 7.7. Means and standard deviations from 4 experiments are shown.
pH-dependence of the recognition of G21-465 by sera from hyperimmunized (pool 1) and VHSV-infected (pool 2 and pool 3) rainbow trout as shown by immunoblotting
| Trout sera | Immunization with VHSV-07.71 | Number of sera | Neutralization titer | pH 6.7/pH 7.7, ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool 1 | Hyperimmunized | 3 | 800 | 2.85 ± 1.36 (n = 3) |
| Pool 2 | Surviving infection | 3 | < 40 | 3.45 ± 0.23 (n = 2) |
| Pool 3 | Surviving infection | 4 | > 5120 | 3.12 ± 0.58 (n = 2) |
G21-465 was electrophoresed in 5-20% polyacrylamide gels (gradient PAGE), transferred to nitrocellulose and derived strips were used for reaction with each of the pooled trout sera at pH 6.7 and 7.7 as described, except that diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used for staining the reaction. Pool 1 included 3 sera from trout hyperimmunized by injection of purified VHSV with neutralization titers of 800 (dilution of the sera causing a 50% decrease in the in vitro VHSV titer). Pool 2 included 3 sera from trout surviving infection with VHSV with neutralization titers < 40 (gift of Dr.Castric). Pool 3 included 4 sera from trout surviving infection with VHSV with neutralization titers > 5120 (gift from Dr. Castric). The intensity of the stained bands were estimated by densitometry (Image J 1.38x, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) and ratios were then calculated by the formula: intensity of the stained bands at 6.7/intensity of the stained bands at pH 7.7. Means and standard deviations were calculated from at least 2 experiments (n).